CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00303641Updated Aug 28, 2017

Safety and Effectiveness of the Medtronic Resting Heart Bypass System in Heart Surgery Patients

A Phase 1 interventional study of Medtronic Resting Heart Bypass System in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Cardiopulmonary Bypass, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-28.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2004, registered Mar 2006).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Medtronic Resting Heart Bypass system is safer and results in less inflammatory reaction than traditional bypass machines used in coronary artery bypass surgery. We hypothesize that the new Medtronic Resting Heart System is safer and results in much less systemic inflammatory reaction in comparison to the standard cardiopulmonary bypass systems currently in use.

Read the detailed description

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has played an extremely crucial role in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery for the past five decades. During CABG, the CPB machine enables the surgeon to stop the heart and perform the surgery in a bloodless operating field. The CPB machine essentially takes over the job of the heart by oxygenating the blood and then perfusing the entire body. In patients undergoing CABG surgery with CPB, a systemic inflammatory reaction occurs when the blood is taken out of the body and circulated through the CPB machine. This inflammatory reaction is believed to increase postoperative morbidity and prolong hospital stay. The systemic inflammatory reaction results in activation of the complement, coagulation, fibrinolytic and kallikrein cascades, it activates leukocytes and endothelial cells causing expression of adhesion molecules and results in the release of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines. This inflammatory reaction during CPB leads to vasodilation, increased interstitial fluid and can affect organs such as the heart, lungs, brain and kidneys resulting in their dysfunction(s). Elimination of CPB in patients undergoing CABG surgery has resulted in reduction of this inflammatory response. Unfortunately, not all patients are able to undergo CABG without the use of CPB.

Most conventional CPB systems also use cardiotomy suction which returns all the blood collected in the operative field back to the CPB reservoir and then eventually returns it to the patient. This blood is rich in inflammatory mediators and small particles because it has been activated by surgical trauma and by the proteins lining the wound cavity. Returning this blood back into the CPB circuit results in further circulation of inflammatory mediators. Removal of the cardiotomy suction from the CPB system could potentially decrease the inflammatory mediators and reduce the inflammatory response during CPB.

Recently, there have been attempts to decrease the inflammatory reaction caused by the use of CPB by developing better, more effective systems. The Medtronic Resting Heart System is very similar to conventional CPB systems and has been approved for clinical use both in Canada and the United States. It has some potential advantages over traditional bypass machines which include; 1)a fully closed-to-air system that does not allow an air-blood interface which could prevent blood activation, 2)it does not have cardiotomy suction and therefore prevents air, lipids or particulate emboli from being re-introduced into the patient's circulation, 3)it minimizes hemodilution by using smaller and low-prime circuits, possibly decreasing the need for postoperative blood transfusion, 4)the CPB circuit, which is the blood-contacting surface, is coated with Carmeda Bioactive Surface (a heparin bioactive surface), that mimics critical characteristics of vascular endothelium and may prevent further blood activation, and 5)it has an active venous air detector and removal device (VARD) that detects venous air and automatically removes the air which may prevent blood activation. All of these elements are potential benefits which may further reduce the morbidity and inflammation associated with CABG surgery.

Thus far to our knowledge, there have been no studies looking at the inflammatory reaction and morbidity in patients undergoing CABG procedures using more improved cardiopulmonary bypass machines. We are therefore proposing a prospective, randomized trial of the safety and effectiveness of the Medtronic Resting Heart system in CABG surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
  • Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Inflammatory reaction
03

In context

Lead sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 352 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Consenting patients undergoing elective surgical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with use of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to provide written informed consent
  • Emergency CABG surgery
  • Concomitant CABG + Valvular surgery
  • Off-pump CABG surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single
Enrollment
60 participants

Interventions

  • DeviceMedtronic Resting Heart Bypass System
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. C-reactive protein

  2. Cell count

  3. Cytokine levels

  4. Complement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative blood loss, units of blood transfused, re-operation for bleeding, chest tube drainage, length of ICU stay, neurologic and renal function, infection, atrial fibrillation and overall length of postoperative hospital stay

07

Study locations

1 site
  • London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Dec;86(6):845-57. PubMed 6606084 ↗
  • Wehlin L, Vedin J, Vaage J, Lundahl J. Activation of complement and leukocyte receptors during on- and off pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jan;25(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00652-3. PubMed 14690730 ↗
  • Edmunds LH Jr. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Nov;66(5 Suppl):S12-6; discussion S25-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00967-9. PubMed 9869435 ↗
  • Matata BM, Sosnowski AW, Galinanes M. Off-pump bypass graft operation significantly reduces oxidative stress and inflammation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Mar;69(3):785-91. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01420-4. PubMed 10750762 ↗
  • Gu YJ, Mariani MA, van Oeveren W, Grandjean JG, Boonstra PW. Reduction of the inflammatory response in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Feb;65(2):420-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01127-2. PubMed 9485239 ↗
  • Fransen E, Maessen J, Dentener M, Senden N, Geskes G, Buurman W. Systemic inflammation present in patients undergoing CABG without extracorporeal circulation. Chest. 1998 May;113(5):1290-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.5.1290. PubMed 9596308 ↗
  • Jewell AE, Akowuah EF, Suvarna SK, Braidley P, Hopkinson D, Cooper G. A prospective randomised comparison of cardiotomy suction and cell saver for recycling shed blood during cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Apr;23(4):633-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00834-5. PubMed 12694789 ↗
  • Aldea GS, Soltow LO, Chandler WL, Triggs CM, Vocelka CR, Crockett GI, Shin YT, Curtis WE, Verrier ED. Limitation of thrombin generation, platelet activation, and inflammation by elimination of cardiotomy suction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting treated with heparin-bonded circuits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Apr;123(4):742-55. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.120347. PubMed 11986603 ↗
  • Kaza AK, Cope JT, Fiser SM, Long SM, Kern JA, Kron IL, Tribble CG. Elimination of fat microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Feb;75(2):555-9; discussion 559. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04540-x. PubMed 12607672 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00303641
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Collaborators
Medtronic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 17, 2006
Start date
Nov 2004
Primary completion
Nov 2005
Completion
Feb 2006
Last update
Aug 28, 2017

Study contacts

Bob Kiaii, MD, FRCSC
principal investigator · Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Western Ontario and the London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion