ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00298233Updated Jun 6, 2014Results posted

High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Oseltamivir to Treat Severe Influenza and Avian Influenza

A Phase 2 interventional study of Oseltamivir in Influenza, Avian Influenza and Severe Influenza, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Completed at 12 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-06.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
326
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Influenza, also known as the flu, is a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses. The illness can range in severity, from mild to severe to even death, and it causes an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 deaths worldwide each year. In the last several years, there have been increasing numbers of human cases of avian influenza, or bird flu. This trend may pose a threat of a future pandemic--worldwide outbreak of disease--with an avian influenza virus that can easily spread from person to person. Oseltamivir is an antiviral medication that is used to treat people with uncomplicated human influenza, and it may be effective in treating people with either severe human influenza or avian influenza. The purpose of this international study is to compare standard-dose oseltamivir versus high-dose oseltamivir for treating people who are hospitalized with severe human influenza or avian influenza.

Read the detailed description

Two main types of influenza virus--Types A and B--are responsible for the seasonal flu epidemics that occur each year. The influenza A viruses can be broken down into subtypes based on two proteins on the surface of the virus: hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N). The A subtypes usually found in humans are H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2. Other A subtypes are found primarily in animals. For example, the "avian influenza virus" refers to an influenza A virus that is found chiefly in birds.

Although avian influenza does not usually affect humans, increasing numbers of cases of human infection from avian influenza virus H5N1 have been reported in the last several years. Because all influenza viruses have the ability to modify, there is concern that this trend of increasing cases may pose a threat of a future pandemic with a new H5N1 virus that could spread easily from person to person.

The H5N1 virus that has caused human infection in Asia is resistant to amantadine and rimantadine, two antiviral medications commonly used for treating people with influenza. Another antiviral medication, oseltamivir, is currently used to treat people with uncomplicated human influenza. The purpose of this study is to compare standard-dose oseltamivir and high-does oseltamivir for treating people who are hospitalized with severe human influenza or avian influenza. The study will also attempt to identify how severe human influenza and avian influenza differ in the following factors: clinical manifestation, relationship between antiviral plasma concentrations and viral dynamics, and pathogenesis.

Upon meeting certain screening criteria, participants will be randomly assigned to receive oseltamivir either at a standard-dose level (75 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) or at a high-dose level (150 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function). Treatment will continue for 5 days, after which participants who meet clinical failure criteria will continue their assigned treatment for an additional 5 days. It is anticipated that participants will remain hospitalized through the course of treatment. On Day 0, which marks the first day of hospitalization, participants will undergo a medical review, physical examination, blood sampling, nasal swab, throat swab, anal swab, and chest x-ray. An endotracheal aspirate procedure and urine sampling may also be performed. During the hospital stay, most of the above procedures will be repeated regularly, and additional samples of lung fluid, cerebral spinal fluid, and pleural fluid may be obtained. On Day 5 and possibly on Day 10, participants will undergo a follow-up x-ray. If applicable, participants will attend outpatient study visits on Days 10, 14, and 28 for further evaluation; participants with avian influenza will also attend visits on Days 56 and 180.

02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza
  • Avian Influenza
  • Severe Influenza

Keywords

  • Antibody Response
  • Antiviral Efficacy
  • Bird Flu
  • Severe Respiratory Distress
  • Viral Replication and Shedding
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 326 is above the median of 240 across 1,894 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,445 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 402 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 300 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least one of the following respiratory symptoms: cough, dyspnea, sore throat
  • Evidence of severe influenza or avian influenza, as defined below
  • Severe influenza infection criteria:

    1. Need for hospitalization
    2. One of the following:

      1. New infiltrate on chest x-ray (or any infiltrate if no prior chest x-ray or not known)
      2. Severe tachypnea (more information on this criterion can be found in the protocol)
      3. Severe dyspnea
      4. Arterial oxygen saturation of 92% or less on room air by trans-cutaneous method
    3. Positive diagnostic testing for influenza, as defined by either rapid influenza antigen (Ag) positive (A or B) or qualitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive for any influenza
    4. Illness (defined by onset of fever, respiratory symptoms, or constitutional symptoms) began within 10 days before study enrollment
  • Avian influenza infection criteria:

    1. Nasal wash, nasopharyngeal aspirate, endotracheal aspirate, nasal swab, or throat swab that is RT-PCR positive influenza for H5 influenza
    2. Illness (defined by onset of fever, respiratory symptoms, or constitutional symptoms) began within 14 days before study enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received more than 72 hours of oseltamivir (six doses) within 14 days
  • Received oseltamivir at higher than standard doses within the last 14 days or during current acute illness, whichever is longer
  • History of allergy or severe intolerance of oseltamivir, as determined by the investigator
  • Alternate explanation for the clinical findings, as determined by the investigator and with the information immediately available
  • Creatine clearance less than 10 ml/minute
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
326 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Dose oseltamivir adult cohort

    All participants \>= 15 years will receive standard-dose oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.

    Drug: Oseltamivir

  • Active comparator
    Double Dose oseltamivir Adult cohort

    All participants \>= 15 years will receive high-dose oseltamivir (150 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.

    Drug: Oseltamivir

  • Active comparator
    Standard Dose Oseltamivir child cohort

    All participants \<15 years will receive standard-dose oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.

    Drug: Oseltamivir

  • Active comparator
    Double Dose Oseltamivir child cohort

    All Participants \<15 years will receive high-dose oseltamivir (150 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.

    Drug: Oseltamivir

Interventions

  • Oseltamivir is a sialic acid analogue that potently and specifically inhibits the viral neuraminidases by competitively and reversibly interacting with the active enzyme site of influenza A and B viruses. Oseltamivir will be administered orally in standard formulations (capsules for adults and children at least 15 years of age; suspension for children younger than 15 years).

    Also known as: Tamiflu

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of All Participants Negative for Viral RNA on Day 5

    Proportion of all participants with no detectable viral RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a combined nasal and throat swab sample on day 5.

    Time frame: After 5 days of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participants Meeting Criteria for Day 5 Clinical Failure

    Proportion of participants that have clinical failure by day 5. Subjects that meet one of the following on Day 5 will be classified as a clinical failure: * Severe tachypnea (respiratory rate ≥ 30 for ages ≥12 years, rate ≥ 40 for ages 6 to 12 years, rate ≥45 for ages 3 to 6 years, rate ≥ 50 for ages 1 to 3 years) * Severe dyspnea (unable to speak full sentences, or use of accessory respiratory muscles) * Arterial oxygen saturation ≤92% on room air by trans-cutaneous method * Need for mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) admission For the purpose of endpoint definition, death prior to or on Day 5 will also be considered a clinical failure at Day 5.

    Time frame: After 5 days of treatment

  2. In-hospital Mortality Rates

    Standard therapy with oseltamivir is five days. Those patients with persistent symptoms on day five were continued on the randomized dose for an additional five days and assessments were performed up to day 10.

    Time frame: After up to 10 days of treatment

  3. Median Time (Days) Receipt of Oxygen

    Time frame: Throughout study, 14 days

  4. Median Time (Days) in ICU

    Time frame: Throughout study, 14 days

  5. Median Time (Days) on Ventilation

    Use of mechanical ventilation at any time for subjects with severe influenza and avian influenza.

    Time frame: Throughout study, 14 days

07

Results

Posted May 22, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard Dose Oseltamivir Adult CohortDouble Dose Oseltamivir Adult CohortStandard Dose Oseltamivir Child CohortDouble Dose Oseltamivir Child Cohort
Started3941122124
Completed3941122124
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of All Participants Negative for Viral RNA on Day 5

Proportion of all participants with no detectable viral RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a combined nasal and throat swab sample on day 5.

Time frame:
After 5 days of treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Proportion of All Participants Negative for Viral RNA on Day 5
participantsDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
Proportion of All Participants Negative for Viral RNA on Day 5115105
Statistical analysis
  • Double Dose Oseltamivir vs Standard Dose Oseltamivir · conditional univariate logistic regressi · p = 0.42 (Significance assessed at the 5% level for a two-sided comparison)analysis stratified by study site
SecondaryParticipants Meeting Criteria for Day 5 Clinical Failure

Proportion of participants that have clinical failure by day 5. Subjects that meet one of the following on Day 5 will be classified as a clinical failure: * Severe tachypnea (respiratory rate ≥ 30 for ages ≥12 years, rate ≥ 40 for ages 6 to 12 years, rate ≥45 for ages 3 to 6 years, rate ≥ 50 for ages 1 to 3 years) * Severe dyspnea (unable to speak full sentences, or use of accessory respiratory muscles) * Arterial oxygen saturation ≤92% on room air by trans-cutaneous method * Need for mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) admission For the purpose of endpoint definition, death prior to or on Day 5 will also be considered a clinical failure at Day 5.

Time frame:
After 5 days of treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants Meeting Criteria for Day 5 Clinical Failure
participantsDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
Participants Meeting Criteria for Day 5 Clinical Failure1620
Statistical analysis
  • Double Dose Oseltamivir vs Standard Dose Oseltamivir · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.54 (Significance assessed at the 5% level for a two-sided comparison)
SecondaryIn-hospital Mortality Rates

Standard therapy with oseltamivir is five days. Those patients with persistent symptoms on day five were continued on the randomized dose for an additional five days and assessments were performed up to day 10.

Time frame:
After up to 10 days of treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
In-hospital Mortality Rates
participantsDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
In-hospital Mortality Rates129
Statistical analysis
  • Double Dose Oseltamivir vs Standard Dose Oseltamivir · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.54 (Significance assessed at the 5% level for a two-sided comparison)Mantel-Haenszel chi-square stratified by study site
SecondaryMedian Time (Days) Receipt of Oxygen
Time frame:
Throughout study, 14 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time (Days) Receipt of Oxygen
daysDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
Median Time (Days) Receipt of Oxygen3 ± 2-53.5 ± 2-7
Statistical analysis
  • Double Dose Oseltamivir vs Standard Dose Oseltamivir · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.48 (Significance assessed at the 5% level for a two-sided comparison)
SecondaryMedian Time (Days) in ICU
Time frame:
Throughout study, 14 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time (Days) in ICU
daysDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
Median Time (Days) in ICU4.4 (3 to 6)5 (2 to 11)
Statistical analysis
  • Double Dose Oseltamivir vs Standard Dose Oseltamivir · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.66 (Significance assessed at the 5% level for a two-sided comparison)
SecondaryMedian Time (Days) on Ventilation

Use of mechanical ventilation at any time for subjects with severe influenza and avian influenza.

Time frame:
Throughout study, 14 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time (Days) on Ventilation
daysDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
Median Time (Days) on Ventilation2.5 (1 to 16)5 (2 to 11)
Statistical analysis
  • Double Dose Oseltamivir vs Standard Dose Oseltamivir · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.58 (Significance assessed at the 5% level for a two-sided comparison)

Adverse events

Collected over Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Double Dose Oseltamivir—1/165 (0.6%)37/165 (22.4%)
Standard Dose Oseltamivir—0/161 (0%)38/161 (23.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
Septic shockRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1650/161
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventDouble Dose OseltamivirStandard Dose Oseltamivir
otherGeneral disorders10/16511/161
respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/1655/161
diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/1659/161
multi-organ failuresGeneral disorders3/1653/161
ThrombocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/1650/161
pneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1652/161
BronchitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1652/161
Septic shockCardiac disorders1/1652/161
acute respiratory distress syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1651/161
neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/1651/161

Baseline characteristics

All participants that were randomized

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Standarad Dose OseltamivirDouble Dose OseltamivirTotal
Child cohort: ≥1 to <15 years122124246
Adult cohort: ≥15 years394180
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standarad Dose OseltamivirDouble Dose OseltamivirTotal
Female7269141
Male8996185
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Changi General Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore
  • National University Hospital, National University of Singapore
    Singapore, Singapore
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
    Singapore, Singapore
  • Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health
    Bangkok, Thailand
  • Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University
    Bangkok, Thailand
  • Bamrasnaradura Infectious Disease Institute
    Nonthaburi, Thailand
  • Chest Disease Institute
    Nonthaburi, Thailand
  • National Hospital of Pediatrics
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • National Institute fof Infectious and Tropical Diseases
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Children's Hospital #1
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Hospital for Tropical Diseases
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Pediatric Hospital #2
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995 Jan-Mar;1(1):7-15. doi: 10.3201/eid0101.950102. PubMed 8903148 ↗
  • Colman PM. Influenza virus neuraminidase: structure, antibodies, and inhibitors. Protein Sci. 1994 Oct;3(10):1687-96. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560031007. PubMed 7849585 ↗
  • de Jong MD, Bach VC, Phan TQ, Vo MH, Tran TT, Nguyen BH, Beld M, Le TP, Truong HK, Nguyen VV, Tran TH, Do QH, Farrar J. Fatal avian influenza A (H5N1) in a child presenting with diarrhea followed by coma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 17;352(7):686-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044307. PubMed 15716562 ↗
  • South East Asia Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network. Effect of double dose oseltamivir on clinical and virological outcomes in children and adults admitted to hospital with severe influenza: double blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013 May 30;346:f3039. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3039. PubMed 23723457 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00298233
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust, World Health Organization, University of Oxford
Responsible party
Jeremy Farrar (Director, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 1, 2006
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Jan 2010
Completion
Jan 2010
Results posted
May 22, 2014
Last update
Jun 6, 2014

Study contacts

Tawee Chotpitayasunohdh, MD
principal investigator · Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand
Tran Tinh Hien, MD
principal investigator · Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Oseltamivir

Start the discussion