CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00294502Updated Feb 22, 2006

Antibiotic Lock Solutions in the Prevention of Catheter Related Bacteremia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Gentamycin/citrate, Minocycline/EDTA in ESRD, sponsored by Henry Ford Health System. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2006-02-22.

Sponsored by Henry Ford Health System · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To study the efficacy of an antibacterial/anticoagulant solution instilled into the hemodialysis (HD) catheters after each treatment ("antibiotic lock solution - ALS") to prevent catheter related bacteremia (CRB) and to salvage catheters with established CRB.

Read the detailed description

Scope of the problem. A large number of hemodialysis patients in this country rely on indwelling tunneled and non-tunneled catheters as vascular access for hemodialysis even though the K/DOQI guidelines discourage their use. In a study performed by ESRD network 11, [to which all Michigan dialysis centers submit data] 63% of patients initiated HD with a catheter as their sole form of vascular access. At 6 months after initiation of HD, 40% of these patients were still using a catheter. Other studies had shown that the prevalence of overall catheter use to be around 20% of all accesses.

Catheter associated infection. Current literature indicates that these catheters are associated with a disproportionate risk for infection, particularly CRB, resulting in high morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure. The 'epidemic' of ESRD in this country has seen an ever increasing reliance on these catheters not only to initiate the HD but also for long term treatment in those patients who have no other access options. It has been estimated that intravascular catheters are associated with more than 60,000 cases of nosocomial bacteremia each year. HD catheters pose a particularly high risk for developing infections because of their frequent use as well as their long-term use. All indwelling vascular catheters are colonized by micro-organisms within 24 hours after insertion. The deposition of biofilm on the external and internal surface of vascular catheters is thought to play an important role in the colonization process. The biofilm is produced by a combination of host factors (e.g., fibrinogen, fibrin, fibronectin and extracellular polysaccharides) and microbial products (e.g., glycocalyx or "slime").

Failure of antibiotics. Systemic antibiotics used to treat bacteremia do not penetrate catheter lumen and therefore do not eradicate the biofilm, leading to potential treatment failures and eventual sacrifice of the catheter. Recently published data suggests that using a combination solution with antibacterial/anticoagulant agents prevents the formation of the 'biofilm' in the catheter lumen thereby preventing CRB, as well as salvage the catheters in cases of established CRB. However, there continues to be a debate on the appropriate antibacterial agent as well as its optimal concentration, in order to eradicate a wide variety of organisms. Several other strategies were studied in the past 10 years to prevent CRB and CRI. These include eradication of nasal Staphylococcal carriage with mupirocin, using chlorhexidine for catheter hub cleaning and exit site disinfection and using mupirocin or Polysporin ointments to the exit site along with standard dressing. But emergence of antibiotic resistance as well as the high costs of administrating these methods continue to be barriers to their widespread use and cannot be relied upon to manage the high rate of infection by themselves.

Salvaging catheters. In the past, infected catheters were routinely removed, especially for Staphylococcus aureus infections, per the CDC guidelines. However, recent small studies indicate that strategies such as ALS packing or changing catheter over a guide wire can salvage a significant fraction of these catheters, thereby saving expense and morbidity, and preserving the site. Thrombotic occlusions and infection are the two most common complications of the HD catheters, each predisposing to the other. Some studies have shown that ALS packing has also improved the long-term catheter function by preventing the formation and propagation of the biofilm. Studying this aspect of catheter maintenance is also an important outcome for our proposed study.

Antibiotic Lock Solutions. We have identified 10 clinical trials (attached as appendix) in the published literature describing the results of antibiotic lock therapy for preventing infections in indwelling vascular catheters. All but one have demonstrated efficacy of ALS packing. Of the 9 successful trials, only 6 were randomized controlled trials and only 3 of these were done on HD catheters, as described below.

Need for a prospective study. If we can achieve the same superior results from our study incorporating the ALS packing strategy, we should be able to assess cost- effectiveness of using the ALS packing vs. standard approach as has been discussed in previous trials, but has not been systematically studied. In fact there are insufficient numbers of patients studies to even perform a meta-analysis. We feel that it is critical to prove the cost-effectiveness of the new strategy in order for it to be used in a widespread fashion.

The applicant, Anatole Besarab MD, has extensive experience in Nephrology and specifically in vascular access management. He has published, lectured, and coordinated symposia on vascular access care and is the current chair of the K/DOQI vascular access workgroup of the NKF.

This project is conceived for the following reasons.

  • The CRB burden in the hemodialysis patients at this institution has reached overwhelming proportions and needs urgent strategies to counter this 'epidemic'. Current management guidelines rely mostly on treatment of established infections but do not aim at preventing these infections. This kind of economic burden and increased morbidity/mortality in patients are unacceptable in the current health care environment. Our study will add to the existing literature in defining the management guidelines for CRB.
  • The Greenfield Health System (GHS) that provides dialysis care to the patients of the Henry Ford Health System includes several hundreds of patients and would be the ideal setting to study the proposed intervention. This population also represents a cross-section of many types of disease severity and number of co-morbid conditions. Therefore they provide an opportunity to observe the effects on the proposed intervention in different demographic settings.
  • Henry Ford Hospital represents a completely new demography to study the effects of the proposed intervention. The disease burden with CRB in the population served by this area is higher than the national average and would be ideal to study the proposed intervention in more detail.
  • The cost effectiveness of using the antibiotic lock therapy has not been well studied to date and will have a significant impact on the eventual formulation of treatment guidelines. In the setting of current economic burden in the health care industry, study of this issue is vital and timely. The vision of a simple, cheap intervention that can result in savings of millions of dollars is central to this study.
02

Conditions studied

  • ESRD
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Henry Ford Health System is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • ESRD patients with tunnelled catheters

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients on IV abx for infections, patients who have AV graft, AV fistulas
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants

Interventions

  • DrugGentamycin/citrate, Minocycline/EDTA
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of symptomatic CRB

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Allon M. Dialysis catheter-related bacteremia: treatment and prophylaxis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Nov;44(5):779-91. PubMed 15492943 ↗
  • Dogra GK, Herson H, Hutchison B, Irish AB, Heath CH, Golledge C, Luxton G, Moody H. Prevention of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related infections using catheter-restricted filling with gentamicin and citrate: a randomized controlled study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Aug;13(8):2133-9. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000022890.29656.22. PubMed 12138146 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2006, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00294502
Lead sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
First posted
Feb 22, 2006
Start date
Sep 2003
Completion
May 2004
Last update
Feb 22, 2006

Study contacts

Antanole Bearabe, MD
principal investigator · Henry Ford Hospital
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2003. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion