CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00291551PEERLESS-HFUpdated May 21, 2012Results posted

Paracor Ventricular Support System (PVSS) for Patients With Heart Failure

A Phase 1 interventional study of Placement of the PVSS Implant in Heart Failure, Congestive, sponsored by Paracor Medical, Inc. Terminated at 12 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-05-21.

Sponsored by Paracor Medical, Inc · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Resources unavailable to continue study follow-up.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a limited safety and feasibility study to evaluate the PVSS Introducer and Paracor Ventricular Support System when used to treat patients with heart failure. The implant, which is loaded onto the delivery system, is placed over the epicardial surface of the right and left ventricles.

No formal hypothesis testing will be performed; descriptive statistics will be used to summarize patient outcomes. The results of the study will be used to guide the design and sample size estimation of future studies.

Read the detailed description

Please refer to brief summary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure, Congestive

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Paracor Medical, Inc is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • NYHA functional class II or III
  • Best medical therapy
  • Ejection fraction \<= 35%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart measurements too large or small for implant sizes
  • Intra-cardiac thrombus
  • Restrictive cardiomyopathy
  • Not a candidate for sternotomy
  • Expected adhesions
  • Previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
  • Active infection
  • Stroke, surgery, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) within 3 months
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 month
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DevicePlacement of the PVSS Implant

    Implant is placed on epicardial surface of the heart surrounding both the right and left ventricles, to provide mechanical support to the ventricular walls.

    Also known as: HeartNet, Ventricular support device, Ventricular elastic support therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Death or Additional Surgical Session at 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Success (Number of Participants Successfully Implanted)

    "Implant success" refers to the ability to successfully deliver a device onto the epicardial surface and leave the device in a satisfactory position.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Change in NYHA Functional Class

    Change in NYHA functional class between baseline and 6 months. "Maintained" means the participant's functional class remains the same as baseline. "Improved" means the participant's functional class has improved (become lower in number) by at least one class. "Worsened" means the participatn's functional class has deteriorated (become higher in number) by at least one class.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  3. Changes in Left Ventricular Diameters

    Mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) from baseline to 6 months (echocardiographic measurements)

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  4. Changes in Left Ventricular Volumes

    Mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDv) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline to 6 months (echocardiographic measurements)

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  5. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

    Mean change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months (echocardiographic measurements)

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  6. Change in Left Ventricular Mass

    Mean change in left ventricular mass from baseline to 6 months (echocardiogram measurements)

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  7. Changes in 6 Minute Walk

    Mean change in 6 minute walk distance (meters) between baseline and 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  8. Changes in Cardiopulmonary Tests

    Mean change in Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) between baseline and 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  9. Mean Changes in Overall Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score

    The MLHF Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire evaluates the effects of heart failure on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life. Each of 21 questions is scored as to how much heart failure has impacted the subject, from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Prior studies have shown a 10-point improvement (10-point decrease in overall score) correlated with a 1 NYHA class improvement, and 10-point worsening (10-point increase in score) was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  10. Number of Adverse Events

    Total adverse events reported prior to study closure

    Time frame: Study duration

  11. Number of Participants Who Died

    Total number of patient deaths reported prior to study closure

    Time frame: Study duration

07

Results

Posted Jun 10, 2011
Limitations and caveats
Insufficient resources to continue study follow-up.

Participant flow

12 investigational sites enrolled 39 subjects between January 2005 and October 2006.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Started39
Completed26
Not completed13
Withdrew: Death7
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6

Outcome measures

PrimaryDeath or Additional Surgical Session at 6 Months
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Death or Additional Surgical Session at 6 Months
participantsNon-randomized, Single Arm, Treatment
Death or Additional Surgical Session at 6 Months4
SecondaryImplant Success (Number of Participants Successfully Implanted)

"Implant success" refers to the ability to successfully deliver a device onto the epicardial surface and leave the device in a satisfactory position.

Time frame:
1 day
Reported as:
Number · participants
Implant Success (Number of Participants Successfully Implanted)
participantsNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Implant Success (Number of Participants Successfully Implanted)38
SecondaryChange in NYHA Functional Class

Change in NYHA functional class between baseline and 6 months. "Maintained" means the participant's functional class remains the same as baseline. "Improved" means the participant's functional class has improved (become lower in number) by at least one class. "Worsened" means the participatn's functional class has deteriorated (become higher in number) by at least one class.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change in NYHA Functional Class
participantsNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Improved20
Maintained13
Worsened3
SecondaryChanges in Left Ventricular Diameters

Mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) from baseline to 6 months (echocardiographic measurements)

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Changes in Left Ventricular Diameters
centimetersNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
LVEDD (cm)-0.3 ± 0.7
LVESD (cm)-0.1 ± 0.6
SecondaryChanges in Left Ventricular Volumes

Mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDv) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline to 6 months (echocardiographic measurements)

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · milliliters
Changes in Left Ventricular Volumes
millilitersNon-randomized, Single Arm, Treatment
LVEDV (ml)-31.6 ± 65.2
LVESV (ml)-29.6 ± 61.6
SecondaryChange in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Mean change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months (echocardiographic measurements)

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
PercentageNon-randomized, Single Arm, Treatment
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction1.6 ± 6.0
SecondaryChange in Left Ventricular Mass

Mean change in left ventricular mass from baseline to 6 months (echocardiogram measurements)

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · grams
Change in Left Ventricular Mass
gramsNon-randomized, Single Arm, Treatment
Change in Left Ventricular Mass-17.6 ± 55.3
SecondaryChanges in 6 Minute Walk

Mean change in 6 minute walk distance (meters) between baseline and 6 months

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Changes in 6 Minute Walk
metersNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Changes in 6 Minute Walk71.5 ± 122.9
SecondaryChanges in Cardiopulmonary Tests

Mean change in Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) between baseline and 6 months

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · ml/kg/min
Changes in Cardiopulmonary Tests
ml/kg/minNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Changes in Cardiopulmonary Tests0 ± 2.8
SecondaryMean Changes in Overall Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score

The MLHF Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire evaluates the effects of heart failure on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life. Each of 21 questions is scored as to how much heart failure has impacted the subject, from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Prior studies have shown a 10-point improvement (10-point decrease in overall score) correlated with a 1 NYHA class improvement, and 10-point worsening (10-point increase in score) was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Changes in Overall Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score
score on a scaleNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Mean Changes in Overall Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score-15.8 ± 22.2
SecondaryNumber of Adverse Events

Total adverse events reported prior to study closure

Time frame:
Study duration
Reported as:
Number · events
Number of Adverse Events
eventsNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Adverse Events276
Serious Adverse Events158
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died

Total number of patient deaths reported prior to study closure

Time frame:
Study duration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Died
participantsNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Number of Participants Who Died7

Adverse events

Collected over 6 years, 3 months (maximum). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Non-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment—30/39 (76.9%)39/39 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
CardiovascularCardiac disorders25/39
GeneralGeneral disorders19/39
PulmonaryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/39
RenalRenal and urinary disorders8/39
HematologyBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/39
NeurologyNervous system disorders4/39
GastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders2/39
Genital-urinaryRenal and urinary disorders1/39
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNon-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
GeneralGeneral disorders32/39
CardiovascularCardiac disorders29/39
PulmonaryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders20/39
RenalRenal and urinary disorders15/39
Genital-urinaryRenal and urinary disorders12/39
GastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders9/39
NeurologyNervous system disorders7/39
HematologyBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/39

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Non-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Mean53 ± 11.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Non-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Female3
Male36
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Non-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American3
White35
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Etiology
Etiology(participants)Non-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Ischemic8
Non-ischemic31
Duration of heart failure
Duration of heart failure(years)Non-randomized, Single- Arm, Treatment
Mean6.9 ± 4.7
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Cardiovascular Disease
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center
    Denver, Colorado 80262, United States
  • University of Florida, Division of Cardiology
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Minneapolis VA Medical Center
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, United States
  • Mid America Heart Institute
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • BryanLGH Heart Institute
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68506, United States
  • The Ohio State University Heart Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • The Methodist Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00291551
Lead sponsor
Paracor Medical, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2006
Start date
Jan 2005
Primary completion
Apr 2007
Completion
Apr 2011
Results posted
Jun 10, 2011
Last update
May 21, 2012

Study contacts

William T Abraham, MD
principal investigator · Ohio State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion