CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00290654Updated Dec 28, 2017Results posted

Internal Radiation Therapy After Lumpectomy in Treating Women With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tamoxifen and Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-28.

Sponsored by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Unable to recruit further patients.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Internal radiation uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Giving internal radiation therapy using a special radiation therapy device may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well internal radiation therapy after lumpectomy works in treating women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate in women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy followed by brachytherapy using the MammoSite\^® Radiation Therapy System.

Secondary

  • Determine the early and late complication rates and cosmetic outcome in these patients after treatment.

OUTLINE: Patients undergo lumpectomy. Patients with negative tumor margins* (no ink on tumor) undergo placement of the MammoSite\^® Radiation Therapy System at the time of lumpectomy or within 4 weeks after surgery.

NOTE: *If positive margins are present, the surgeon may elect to resect the positive margins and then insert a new MammoSite® device if all other eligibility criteria are met.

Beginning 2-5 days after placement of the MammoSite\^®, patients undergo brachytherapy through the MammoSite\^® twice daily for 5 days (a total of 10 fractions).

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for ≥ 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • ductal breast carcinoma in situ
  • breast cancer in situ
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 39 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 28 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) confirmed by excisional or needle biopsy
  • Size: \< 3 cm on mammogram
  • Unicentric disease
  • Ability to place MammoSite device at time of lumpectomy or within 4 weeks of lumpectomy
  • Patient Age: ≥ 18 years, no upper limit
  • Life expectancy > 5 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of cancer other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cancer of the cervix
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Multicentric disease
  • Diagnosis of collagen vascular diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosis, scleroderma, or dermatomyositis
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lumpectomy with Brachytherapy

    Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, a non-invasive form of breast cancer) treated with standard lumpectomy/brachytherapy following by radiation using the MammoSite (FDA approved a balloon-catheter device placed in the lumpectomy cavity through which high dose radiation is delivered). Tamoxifen may be used postoperatively at the discretion of the treating physicians and patient.

    Drug: Tamoxifen · Procedure: Lumpectomy · Radiation: brachytherapy

Interventions

  • DrugTamoxifen

    Tamoxifen may be used postoperatively at the discretion of the treating physicians and patient

  • ProcedureLumpectomy

    A standard lumpectomy will be performed with an attempt to remove at least 1 cm of gross margin around the DCIS.

  • Radiationbrachytherapy

    Treatment will be given in 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy per fraction twice a day, with a minimum of 6 hours between fractions. In general, brachytherapy will start between 2 - 5 days of implant. All treatments will be done using a commercially available HDR and 192Ir radioactive sources.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

    Count of patients with early stage breast cancer who developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and failed after receiving breast-conserving therapy.

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment

  2. Number of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

    Count of patients with early stage breast cancer who developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and failed after receiving breast-conserving therapy.

    Time frame: 5 years after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications

    Complications to be measured include: breast tenderness/pain,reddening of the skin, bruising, formation of blood or fluid under the skin, skin ulceration, infection, discoloration of the skin, development of telangiectasia (spider veins), hardening of the breast tissue, and retraction of the breast tissue.

    Time frame: within 6 months of treatment

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications

    Complications to be measured include: breast tenderness/pain,reddening of the skin, bruising, formation of blood or fluid under the skin, skin ulceration, infection, discoloration of the skin, development of telangiectasia (spider veins), hardening of the breast tissue, and retraction of the breast tissue.

    Time frame: more than 6 months after treatment, for up to 5 years

  3. Percentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

    The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

  4. Percentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

    The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

  5. Percentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

    The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

  6. Percentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

    The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

07

Results

Posted May 15, 2015

Participant flow

Eligible patients wereinvited to participate in the study by their physician, who explained the details of the trial and obtained informed consent. Patients who met the eligibility criteria and signed the appropriate consent were entered into the study before the MammoSite device was inserted.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMammoSite Treatment Group
Started41
Completed41
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

Count of patients with early stage breast cancer who developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and failed after receiving breast-conserving therapy.

Time frame:
1 year after treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence
participantsEvaluable Patients
Number of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence0
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

Count of patients with early stage breast cancer who developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and failed after receiving breast-conserving therapy.

Time frame:
5 years after treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence
participantsEvaluable Patients
Number of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence4
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications

Complications to be measured include: breast tenderness/pain,reddening of the skin, bruising, formation of blood or fluid under the skin, skin ulceration, infection, discoloration of the skin, development of telangiectasia (spider veins), hardening of the breast tissue, and retraction of the breast tissue.

Time frame:
within 6 months of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications
percentage of participantsEvaluable Patients
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications65.8
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications

Complications to be measured include: breast tenderness/pain,reddening of the skin, bruising, formation of blood or fluid under the skin, skin ulceration, infection, discoloration of the skin, development of telangiectasia (spider veins), hardening of the breast tissue, and retraction of the breast tissue.

Time frame:
more than 6 months after treatment, for up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications
percentage of participantsEvaluable Patients
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Complications24.4
SecondaryPercentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

Time frame:
6 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of physicians
Percentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent
percentage of physiciansEvaluable Patients
Percentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent100
SecondaryPercentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

Time frame:
12 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of physicians
Percentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent
percentage of physiciansEvaluable Patients
Percentage of Physicians Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent86.7
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

Time frame:
6 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent
percentage of participantsEvaluable Patients
Percentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent96.8
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent

The following items will be evaluated by comparing the treated breast with the untreated breast: overall cosmetic result; appearance of the surgical scar; breast size; breast shape; nipple position; and shape of areola. In scoring these items, a 4-point scale will be used, classifying the results into one of the following categories: "0" representing an excellent result; "1" a good result; "2" a fair result; and "3" a poor result.

Time frame:
12 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent
percentage of participantsEvaluable Patients
Percentage of Patients Judging the Cosmetic Outcome as Good or Excellent92.3

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MammoSite Treatment Group—1/41 (2.4%)28/41 (68.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMammoSite Treatment Group
Skin ulcerationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/41
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMammoSite Treatment Group
Breast tenderness/pain - early onsetInjury, poisoning and procedural complications11/41
Erythema - early onsetInjury, poisoning and procedural complications11/41
Pigmentation - early onsetSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders8/41
Induration - early onsetSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/41
Hematoma/seroma - early onsetInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/41
Breast tenderness/pain - late onsetInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/41
Infection - early onsetInfections and infestations4/41
Telangiectasia - late onsetSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/41

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MammoSite Treatment Group
Median54 (36 to 86)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MammoSite Treatment Group
Female41
Male0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)MammoSite Treatment Group
United States41
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00290654
Lead sponsor
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2006
Start date
Dec 2002
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
May 15, 2015
Last update
Dec 28, 2017

Study contacts

Todd M. Tuttle, MD
principal investigator · Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion