ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00243841SBF-HCCUpdated Dec 13, 2018Results posted

Dose Escalation Study for Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma

An interventional study of Stereotactic Body Radiation in Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, sponsored by Indiana University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-13.

Sponsored by Indiana University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of limited fractions of large dose radiation in an effort to achieve a biologically potent cancer therapy in selected patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

Despite recent advances in early detection and diagnosis, only 30-40% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma may benefit from radical therapies. Liver transplantation offers the best chance for cure. Surgical resection has been the only other potentially curative option, but the majority of patients are not candidates for resection. This reflects the usual comorbidity of severe underlying liver disease that either precludes surgery or makes the surgical approach extremely dangerous.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
03

In context

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

3,648 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; 1,061 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is above the median of 54 across 2,618 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.

Browse Carcinoma, Hepatocellular studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 89 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Evaluation by the Surgery and/or Liver Transplant Team has been performed and the patient is not considered a candidate for either "standard" therapy to target area (upper abdomen)

  • Adequate liver function defined as:

    • total \< 3mg/dl, albumin > 2.5 g/dl
    • normal PT/ unless on anticoagulants
    • mild elevation of liver enzymes acceptable (must be less than three times )
  • Adequate renal function (creatinine \< 1.8 mg/dl or ≥ 50 ml/min)
  • Adequate bone marrow reserve:

    • ANC count ≥ 1500 mm3
    • ≥ 50,000/mm3
    • > 9 g/dL

NOTE: Lab values must be obtained within 2 weeks prior to being registered for protocol therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No history of systemic lupus erythematous, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis or scleroderma
  • No chemotherapy within 14 days before radiotherapy (chemotherapy may cause transient hepatitis with hepatomegaly)
  • No subsequent chemotherapy planned within 2 weeks of radiotherapy
  • No active liver infection
  • No acute Hepatitis. Definition of active disease:

    • Hepatitis A: Acute hepatitis determined by presence of Anti-HAV- IgM
    • :

      1. HBsAg (HB surface Antigen): present in patients with acute and chronic hepatitis
      2. HBV DNA present in patients with active viral replication in amounts greater than 100,000 copies
      3. HBeAg is present in wild type HBV infection and suggests active replication
      4. Anti-HBs: Antibody against HBsAg appears after HBV infections and confers immunity
      5. Anti-HBc-IgM: Antibody against HBcAg, fraction IgM, present in acute infection and often could be detected during periods of high viral replication in chronic disease
      6. Anti-HBc-IgG: is present in chronic disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiation Treatment Arm :A

    Patients with a score of Childs A Will receive 3 fractions of radiation over 5-10 days

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation

  • Experimental
    Radiation Treatment Arm: B

    Patients with a score of Childs B will receive 5 fractions of radiation over 2-6 weeks.

    Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation

Interventions

  • RadiationStereotactic Body Radiation

    Arm A: Childs A - receive 3 fractions. Arm B: Childs B - receive 5 fractions.

    Also known as: Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With DLTs

    Number of patients experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity during the Phase I portion of the trial.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. 6 Month Local In-field Control

    Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who were free of in-field progression at 6 months following treatment for the patients in Phase II

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to In-field Failure

    Kaplan-Meier Analyses will be used to calculate the median and 95% Confidence Interval for the time until in-field failure. This will be calculated from the time of treatment until the time of in-field failure. If a patient did not have in-field failure, the patient will be censored at their last evaluation date.

    Time frame: up to 4 yrs

  2. Overall Survival

    Kaplan-Meier Analysis will be used to calculate the median and 95% CI for overall survival. This will be calculated from the time of treatment until death. If a patient did not die, the patient will be censored at their last known alive date.

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

  3. Phase II: Number of Patients With Treatment Related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events

    Number of unique patients who had grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were possibly, probably or definitely related to study treatment.

    Time frame: up to 4 years

07

Results

Posted Dec 13, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase I: 36 GyPhase I: 42 GyPhase I: 40 GyPhase I: 48 GyPhase II Childs APhase II Childs B
Started36533921
Completed36433919
Not completed001002
Withdrew: Physician decision001002

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With DLTs

Number of patients experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity during the Phase I portion of the trial.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With DLTs
ParticipantsPhase I: 36 GyPhase I: 42 GyPhase I: 40 GyPhase I: 48 Gy
Number of Patients With DLTs0210
Primary6 Month Local In-field Control

Percent of patients and the 95% Binomial Confidence interval who were free of in-field progression at 6 months following treatment for the patients in Phase II

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
6 Month Local In-field Control
percentage of participantsPhase II Childs APhase II Childs B
6 Month Local In-field Control92.3 (79.1 to 98.4)87.5 (61.7 to 98.5)
SecondaryTime to In-field Failure

Kaplan-Meier Analyses will be used to calculate the median and 95% Confidence Interval for the time until in-field failure. This will be calculated from the time of treatment until the time of in-field failure. If a patient did not have in-field failure, the patient will be censored at their last evaluation date.

Time frame:
up to 4 yrs
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to In-field Failure
monthsPhase II Childs APhase II Childs B
Time to In-field FailureNA (NA to NA)32.2 (32.2 to NA)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Kaplan-Meier Analysis will be used to calculate the median and 95% CI for overall survival. This will be calculated from the time of treatment until death. If a patient did not die, the patient will be censored at their last known alive date.

Time frame:
Up to 8 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsRadiation Treatment Arm :ARadiation Treatment Arm: B
Overall Survival50.43 (30.88 to 68.59)21.40 (10.45 to NA)
SecondaryPhase II: Number of Patients With Treatment Related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events

Number of unique patients who had grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were possibly, probably or definitely related to study treatment.

Time frame:
up to 4 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase II: Number of Patients With Treatment Related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events
ParticipantsPhase II Childs APhase II Childs B
Phase II: Number of Patients With Treatment Related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events59

Adverse events

Collected over up to 4 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase I: 36 Gy3/3 (100%)1/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)
Phase I: 42 Gy4/6 (66.7%)1/6 (16.7%)6/6 (100%)
Phase I: 40 Gy4/5 (80%)1/5 (20%)5/5 (100%)
Phase I: 48 Gy2/3 (66.7%)1/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)
Phase II Childs A19/39 (48.7%)1/39 (2.6%)39/39 (100%)
Phase II Childs B13/21 (61.9%)1/21 (4.8%)21/21 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase I: 36 GyPhase I: 42 GyPhase I: 40 GyPhase I: 48 GyPhase II Childs APhase II Childs B
Leukocytes (total WBC)Investigations0/30/60/51/30/390/21
PlateletsInvestigations0/30/61/51/30/390/21
Cardiac arhythmia - otherCardiac disorders0/30/60/51/30/390/21
Gastrointestinal - otherGastrointestinal disorders0/30/60/51/30/390/21
Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/61/51/30/390/21
AST, SGOT (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase)Metabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/61/51/30/390/21
ConfusionNervous system disorders1/30/60/50/30/390/21
HemoglobinInvestigations0/30/61/50/31/390/21
ALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)Metabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/61/50/30/390/21
Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Investigations0/30/61/50/30/390/21
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventPhase I: 36 GyPhase I: 42 GyPhase I: 40 GyPhase I: 48 GyPhase II Childs APhase II Childs B
PlateletsInvestigations1/34/64/52/335/3921/21
INR (international normalized ratio of prothrobin time)Investigations3/33/65/52/320/3918/21
Albumin, Serum-low(hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disorders2/36/65/51/330/3921/21
Alkaline PhosphateMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/34/64/53/321/3915/21
AST, SGOTMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/35/65/53/338/3921/21
BilirubinInvestigations3/35/65/53/333/3921/21
GGTInvestigations3/35/63/53/335/3918/21
HemoglobinInvestigations0/35/64/52/329/3915/21
Leukocytes (total WBC)Investigations1/33/62/52/331/3916/21
ALT, SGPTMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/31/63/52/329/3914/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Phase IPhase II Childs APhase II Childs BTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years10271754
>=65 years712423
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Phase IPhase II Childs APhase II Childs BTotal
Mean60.8 ± 9.7660.9 ± 10.6258.5 ± 7.5560.2 ± 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase IPhase II Childs APhase II Childs BTotal
Female111416
Male16281761
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase IPhase II Childs APhase II Childs BTotal
Hispanic or Latino0011
Not Hispanic or Latino16382074
Unknown or Not Reported1102
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase IPhase II Childs APhase II Childs BTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American27211
White15301964
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Indiana University Department of Radiation Oncology
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2004, a primary completion of Dec 2016 and a completion of Dec 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Dec 2018, 1 year 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2005
First posted
Oct 25, 2005
Start
May 2004
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2016
Results first posted
Dec 13, 2018
Last update
Dec 13, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00243841
Lead sponsor
Indiana University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Mark Langer (Professor of Clinical Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 25, 2005
Start date
May 2004
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2016
Completion
Dec 31, 2016
Results posted
Dec 13, 2018
Last update
Dec 13, 2018

Study contacts

Mark Langer, MD
principal investigator · Indiana University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion