ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00240916Updated Jun 9, 2022

Ontogeny of Measles Immunity in Infants

An observational study in Measles, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Months and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-09.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
750
Ages
6 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an immunogenicity study evaluating the development of the immune response of healthy infants following primary vaccination with Attenuvax at 6 or 9 months of age compared with responses in 12 month-old infants receiving MMR-II. Responses of infants receiving an early two dose measles vaccine regimen with the first dose given at 6 or 9 months followed by a second dose administered at 12 months will also be compared to infants given a single dose at 12 months of age (Table 2). The current approved regimen for measles vaccination is a first vaccination at 12-15 months and a subsequent vaccination at school entry.

A secondary endpoint of this study will be to assess the safety of measles vaccine administered as Attenuvax at 6 or 9 months of age and in an early two dose measles vaccine regimen with Attenuvax administered at 6 or 9 months followed by MMR-II at 12 months of age.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label immunogenicity and safety study of live attenuated Measles Vaccine (Attenuvax) and Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR-II) vaccine administered to healthy children at 6 (n=70), 9 (n=70), or 12 (n=70) months of age. Attenuvax (Measles Virus Vaccine Live, Merck \& Co., Inc) and MMR-II (Measles-Mumps-Rubella Virus Vaccine Live, Merck \& Co., Inc) will be delivered as 0.5 mL per dose, administered subcutaneously. Both vaccines are licensed for use in infants in the United States. MMR-II is recommended as part of the childhood immunization schedule by the AAP and ACIP, and Attenuvax is recommended for use as a single component vaccine in infants 6-11 months particularly for foreign travel and in measles outbreaks79. Infants vaccinated with Attenuvax at 6 or 9 months receive MMR-II at 12 months of age as recommended for follow-up vaccination. Immunization against measles is given as a trivalent formulation with mumps and rubella and is indicated as a primary dose at 12-15 months of age with a second dose recommended routinely at time of school entry, 4-6 years of age, but can be given at any earlier age provided that the interval between the first and second doses is at least 4 weeks .

Two hundred and ten healthy children attending the Palo Alto Medical Clinic will be recruited into one of three cohorts over a five year period. (Table 1). All children in cohort 1 and 2 (6 and 9 month old infants) will receive Attenuvax as part of their participation in this study followed by MMR-II at 12 months of age as part of their routine WCC and not as a study vaccine. Infants recruited into cohort 3, (twelve month old infants) will receive one dose of MMR-II at 12 months. All infants in the study (cohort 1, 2 or 3) are receiving MMR-II at 12 months as part of their routine childhood vaccines. The vaccination schedules is summarized in Table 1. Other immunizations as required for routine WCC will be administered simultaneously. Participation will entail 2-4 visits, 2-3 blood samples, and 1-2 immunizations and will end after the 9-18 month visit, totaling 3 to 12 months time of participation for a subject depending on cohort and if participants opt for a second follow-up blood sample.

02

Conditions studied

  • Measles

Browse trials for

03

In context

Measles

134 studies on the registry are indexed under Measles; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 750 is above the median of 282 across 26 observational studies indexed under Measles.

Browse Measles studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,168 studies on the registry; 431 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Study populations include infants who are 6, 9, and 12 months of age, and healthy adults older than 18 years.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Subjects must meet all of the following criteria in order to be enrolled:

  1. Healthy infants 6, 9, or 12 months (+ 3 weeks) of age
  2. Free of obvious health problems as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study
  3. Parent/legal guardian willing and capable of signing written
  4. Parent/legal guardian expected to be available for entire study
  5. Parent/legal guardian can be reached by telephone

Exclusion Criteria:All subjects meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation:

  1. Former premature infants (\<36 weeks)
  2. Birth weight \< 2500grams
  3. Significant underlying chronic illness
  4. Immunodeficiency disease or therapy in the participant
  5. Any other condition which in the clinical judgment of the investigator might interfere with vaccine evaluation
  6. Allergy to any components of the vaccine, including anaphylaxis or anyphalaxoid reaction to neomycin or eggs
  7. Administration of an drug
  8. Blood products within 3 months of initial enrollment
  9. Current febrile respiratory illness or other active febrile infection
  10. Family history of congenital/hereditary immunodeficiency, unless immune competence of subject has been determined.
  11. Blood dyscrasias, leukemia, lymphomas of any type or other malignant neoplasms affecting the bone marrow or lymphatic systems.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
750 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • BiologicalAttenuvax (Measles Virus Live Vaccine, 0.5ml subcutaneous)
  • BiologicalMMR-II (Measles-Mumps-Rubella Virus Live Vaccine, 0.5ml subcutaneous)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Immune response to measles vaccine

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Affect of maternal antibodies on immune response to measles vaccine.

    Time frame: 6 mo

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation/Department of Pediatrics
    Palo Alto, California 94301, United States
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data is shared as requested by other investigators including raw data and summarized data

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Is available

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 1993, a primary completion of Jul 2011 and a completion of Jul 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 14, 2005
First posted
Oct 18, 2005
Start
Jul 1993
Primary completionActual
Jul 2011
CompletionActual
Jul 2013
Last update
Jun 9, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00240916
Responsible party
Hayley Altman Gans (Clinical Associate Professor, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 18, 2005
Start date
Jul 1993
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Jul 2013
Last update
Jun 9, 2022

Study contacts

Hayley Altman Gans
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion