CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00212576Updated Nov 29, 2019

Promoting Early School Readiness in Primary Health Care

An interventional study of Video Interaction Project and Building Blocks Project in Language Development Disorders, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 35 Weeks and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-29.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
675
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Weeks and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project will measure the degree to which parenting programs based in pediatric primary care can be effective in promoting language development and school readiness in at-risk young children.

The study is a randomized controlled trial in which two different primary care-based parenting programs will be compared to a control group in a population that is at risk on the basis of poverty. The two programs represent varying levels of low intensity, but each has the same goals: enhancing parent-child interaction in order to improve language, cognitive and social-emotional development and ultimately promote school readiness and school performance.

One program is called the "Video Interaction Project". While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent (and infant!) and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.

The other program is called the "ASQ-Building Blocks Project". This project employs a public health approach to facilitate parental engagement in child development. Families are sent monthly newsletters that focus on child development, infant cues and parenting; included with each newsletter is an inexpensive, developmentally stimulating toy. In addition, families periodically receive Ages and Stages Questionnaires, which they complete and mail back to the program. Based on the questionnaires, the program determines whether the infant has screened positive for possible developmental delay and provides this information to both the family and the primary care provider.

This study will test 2 hypotheses:

  1. Primary care based parenting interventions can impact parent-child interaction, early child development and school readiness.
  2. Interventions of differing intensity will have impacts of differing magnitude depending on the risk level of the family.
Read the detailed description

This project will measure the degree to which parenting programs based in pediatric primary care can be effective in promoting language development and school readiness in at-risk young children. The study will represent a collaboration between the Department of Pediatrics at New York University School of Medicine - Bellevue Hospital Center, the Medical and Health Research Association of New York City, Inc., and the Center for Research on Culture, Development and Education at New York University Steinhardt School of Education. Initial funding was provided by NICHD for 4 years. NICHD provided 5 additional years of competing renewal funding beginning in July, 2010.

The study is a randomized controlled trial in which two different primary care-based parenting programs will be compared to a control group in a population that is at risk on the basis of poverty. The two programs represent varying levels of low intensity, but each has the same goals: enhancing parent-child interaction in order to improve language, cognitive and social-emotional development and ultimately promote school readiness and school performance.

One program is called the "Video Interaction Project". While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.

The other program is called the "ASQ-Building Blocks Project". This project employs a public health approach to facilitate parental engagement in child development. Families are sent monthly newsletters that focus on child development, infant cues and parenting; included with each newsletter is an inexpensive, developmentally stimulating toy. In addition, families periodically receive Ages and Stages Questionnaires, which they complete and mail back to the program. Based on the questionnaires, the program determines whether the infant has screened positive for possible developmental delay and provides this information to both the family and the primary care provider.

The study will take place at Bellevue Hospital Center, a public hospital serving low socioeconomic status families from throughout New York City. Infant-mother dyads will be enrolled during the postpartum period and followed through age 2 years. Periodic assessments will be performed of parent-child interaction and child developmental outcome.

At age 3 years, VIP and control families were re-randomized to receive either additional VIP from age 3 to 5 years or to control during that period. This factorial design will allow for assessment of dose and timing in relation to outcomes.

We further plan to follow children into school, so that we can assess long-term educational outcomes including standardized test scores. Should long-term funding be obtained, we will follow children through high school to assess intervention impacts on graduation rates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Language Development Disorders

Keywords

  • Child development
  • Language Development
  • Parenting
03

In context

Language Development Disorders

114 studies on the registry are indexed under Language Development Disorders; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 675 is above the median of 71 across 100 interventional studies indexed under Language Development Disorders.

Browse Language Development Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Weeks and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Intention to receive primary care in the well-child clinic (FCC or newborn clinic) at Bellevue Hospital Center.
  • Intention to remain in the New York City area for at least 3 years.
  • Primary caregiver's language is English or Spanish.
  • Birthweight 2000gm or higher
  • Gestational age 35 weeks or higher

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant newborn medical complication
  • Significant congenital anomaly or syndrome
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
675 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Building Blocks (0-3)

    Randomized at birth to receive Building Blocks Project from birth through 3 years of age. Note: This arm not followed past 3 years of age; NOT re-randomized to any group at age 3.

    Behavioral: Building Blocks Project

  • Experimental
    VIP (0-3), VIP (3-5)

    Randomized at birth to receive Video Interaction Project from birth through 3 years of age. Re-randomized at 3 years to receive Video Interaction Project from 3-5 years of age.

    Behavioral: Video Interaction Project

  • Experimental
    VIP (0-3), Control (3-5)

    Randomized at birth to receive Video Interaction Project from birth through 3 years of age. Re-randomized at 3 years to receive care as usual (control) from 3-5 years of age.

    Behavioral: Video Interaction Project

  • Experimental
    Control (0-3), VIP (3-5)

    Randomized at birth to receive care as usual (control) from birth through 3 years of age. Re-randomized at 3 years to receive Video Interaction Project from 3-5 years of age.

    Behavioral: Video Interaction Project

  • No intervention
    Control (0-3), Control (3-5)

    Randomized at birth to receive care as usual (control) from birth through 3 years of age. Re-randomized at 3 years to receive receive care as usual (control) from 3-5 years of age.

Interventions

  • BehavioralVideo Interaction Project

    While waiting to see the primary care provider for well child care, the family meets with a child development specialist, who videotapes the parent and infant interacting together. The videotape is then rewound and watched together by the parent and child development specialist. This leads to a discussion about child development, infant cues and parenting, with the child development specialist building on observed strengths in the interaction. In addition, families are provided with parenting pamphlets developed for the project, and with inexpensive developmentally stimulating toys.

  • BehavioralBuilding Blocks Project

    This project employs a public health approach to facilitate parental engagement in child development. Families are sent monthly newsletters that focus on child development, infant cues and parenting; included with each newsletter is an inexpensive, developmentally stimulating toy. In addition, families periodically receive Ages and Stages Questionnaires, which they complete and mail back to the program. Based on the questionnaires, the program determines whether the infant has screened positive for possible developmental delay and provides this information to both the family and the primary care provider.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Discipline assessed using the Discipline Survey

    Discipline mediates effects of poverty on social-emotional outcomes (Gershoff, 2007), and attitudes about discipline practices form early in children's lives (Socolar, 1996).

    Time frame: 6, 14, 24, 36, 54 mos and in 1st grade

  2. Stress related to interactions and lack of warmth will be assessed using The Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI)

    Stress related to interactions and lack of warmth mediate effects of poverty on emotional outcomes.

    Time frame: 6, 14, 24, 36, 54 mos and in 1st grade

  3. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development

    Will assess cognitive development

    Time frame: 14, 24, and 36 mos

  4. Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities

    Will be used to estimate child's cognitive. Four sub-tests will be used: Verbal comprehension (VC) assesses the comprehension knowledge Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive factor (Gc); Memory for Words and Auditory Working Memory assess the short term memory CHC factor (Gsm); Visual Matching measures the CHC processing speed factor (Gs).

    Time frame: 14, 24, and 36 mos

07

Study locations

1 site
  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Flynn V, Tomopoulos S, Rovira I, Tineo W, Pebenito C, Torres C, Torres H, Nixon AF. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care to promote child development: a randomized, controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Feb;26(1):34-41. PubMed 15718881 ↗
  • Mendelsohn AL, Valdez PT, Flynn V, Foley GM, Berkule SB, Tomopoulos S, Fierman AH, Tineo W, Dreyer BP. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care: impact at 33 months on parenting and on child development. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 Jun;28(3):206-12. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3180324d87. PubMed 17565287 ↗
  • Berkule SB, Dreyer BP, Huberman HS, Fierman AH, Mendelsohn AL. Attitudes about shared reading among at-risk mothers of newborn babies. Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.10.004. PubMed 17261482 ↗
  • Mendelsohn AL, Berkule SB, Tomopoulos S, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Huberman HS, Alvir J, Dreyer BP. Infant television and video exposure associated with limited parent-child verbal interactions in low socioeconomic status households. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 May;162(5):411-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.5.411. PubMed 18458186 ↗
  • Berkule SB, Dreyer BP, Klass PE, Huberman HS, Yin HS, Mendelsohn AL. Mothers' expectations for shared reading after delivery: implications for reading activities at 6 months. Ambul Pediatr. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Apr 8. PubMed 18501863 ↗
  • Green CM, Berkule SB, Dreyer BP, Fierman AH, Huberman HS, Klass PE, Tomopoulos S, Yin HS, Morrow LM, Mendelsohn AL. Maternal literacy and associations between education and the cognitive home environment in low-income families. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Sep;163(9):832-7. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.136. PubMed 19736337 ↗
  • Weisleder A, Cates CB, Harding JF, Johnson SB, Canfield CF, Seery AM, Raak CD, Alonso A, Dreyer BP, Mendelsohn AL. Links between Shared Reading and Play, Parent Psychosocial Functioning, and Child Behavior: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;213:187-195.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.037. Epub 2019 Aug 6. PubMed 31399245 ↗
  • Cates CB, Weisleder A, Berkule Johnson S, Seery AM, Canfield CF, Huberman H, Dreyer BP, Mendelsohn AL. Enhancing Parent Talk, Reading, and Play in Primary Care: Sustained Impacts of the Video Interaction Project. J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;199:49-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 24. PubMed 29703577 ↗
  • Mendelsohn AL, Cates CB, Weisleder A, Berkule Johnson S, Seery AM, Canfield CF, Huberman HS, Dreyer BP. Reading Aloud, Play, and Social-Emotional Development. Pediatrics. 2018 May;141(5):e20173393. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3393. Epub 2018 Apr 9. PubMed 29632254 ↗
  • Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Brockmeyer CA, Berkule-Silberman SB, Huberman HS, Tomopoulos S. Randomized controlled trial of primary care pediatric parenting programs: effect on reduced media exposure in infants, mediated through enhanced parent-child interaction. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jan;165(1):42-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.266. PubMed 21199979 ↗
  • Mendelsohn AL, Huberman HS, Berkule SB, Brockmeyer CA, Morrow LM, Dreyer BP. Primary care strategies for promoting parent-child interactions and school readiness in at-risk families: the Bellevue Project for Early Language, Literacy, and Education Success. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jan;165(1):33-41. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.254. PubMed 21199978 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00212576
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2005
Start date
Nov 2005
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2017
Completion
Dec 18, 2017
Last update
Nov 29, 2019

Study contacts

Alan L Mendelsohn, MD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion