ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00207337Updated Jan 23, 2008

Exhale (R) Stent for Emphysema

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent in Emphysema, sponsored by Broncus Technologies. Completed at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-01-23.

Sponsored by Broncus Technologies · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Current treatment for emphysema is limited to measures that include inhaled oxygen, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. Highly invasive procedures such as lung volume reduction surgery or lung transplantation are also performed. Treatment using the Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic treatment that has the potential to reduce shortness of breath in emphysema patients. This study tests the safety and effects of Exhale DES in the treatment of patients with emphysema.

Read the detailed description

Emphysema affects an estimated 60 million people worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In its most basic terms, emphysema causes the destruction of lung parenchyma resulting in collateral ventilation from one part of the lung to another through the disrupted alveolar walls, to the point that gas transport from one part of the lung to another may exceed gas flow through the small airways. In other words, the gas can move freely about within the lung, but it cannot get out, which causes over inflation, or hyperinflation of the diseased lung. When the disease is far advanced, patients are afflicted with disabling dyspnea that progressively restricts their activities and eventually causes great suffering. The crippling effects of end-stage emphysema, including severe dyspnea and marked limitation of activities, relate in large measure to the dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs associated with the loss of elasticity, gas trapping and collapse of small airways. The progressive enlargement of the thorax and flattening of the diaphragm render inspiratory muscles inefficient, increase the work of breathing and contribute to a feeling of breathlessness. The major medical therapeutic modalities include bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drugs directed at decreasing airway resistance and antibiotics to combat infection. Pulmonary rehabilitation techniques and exercise training have proven of palliative benefit. In general, the results of medical treatment for advanced airway obstruction frequently result in a persistently anguished patient and frustrated physician. A system that could efficiently decompress emphysematous lungs with each breath would result in significant clinical benefit, including lessened dyspnea, decreased work of breathing, and increased exercise tolerance.

In addition to medical therapies, there are two surgical therapies available to emphysema sufferers: Lung transplantation and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS). In the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), LVRS was shown to be effective in a sub-set of emphysema patients, but it had the drawback of increased short-term mortality as compared to the medical control arm. This was likely due to the invasiveness of LVRS.

Lung transplantation is a widely accepted surgical treatment for emphysema; however it is an unrealistic option for most patients. The selection criteria are very stringent for acceptance to receive a donor lung(s). Lung transplantation carries a high long-term morbidity and mortality and is severely limited by the shortage of available donor lungs.

We seek to take advantage of collateral ventilation seen in advanced emphysema by creating passageways from the lung parenchyma to large airways, through which air can escape the lungs during exhalation. The Exhale therapeutic intervention should be applicable to the majority of emphysema patients who suffer from hyperinflation of their lungs. It would be desirable to have a therapeutic option that is both less invasive and more readily available to emphysema sufferers. We have been working on such a therapy and have begun to investigate it in the clinic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emphysema

Keywords

  • COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
  • Emphysema
  • Minimally invasive
03

In context

Emphysema

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Emphysema; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 48 across 208 interventional studies indexed under Emphysema.

Browse Emphysema studies →

Lead sponsor

Broncus Technologies is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. High resolution computed tomography (CT) scan evidence of bilateral emphysema
  2. Residual volume (RV) ≥ 220% predicted.
  3. Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 133% of predicted value.
  4. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) \< 40% of predicted or FEV1 \< 1 liter.
  5. Marked dyspnea, scoring ≥ 2 on the modified Medical Research Council scale of 0-4.
  6. Patient has undergone pulmonary rehabilitation of 16 - 20 sessions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. FEV1 > 20%
  2. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) \< 15% of predicted.
  3. Respiratory infection requiring > 3 hospitalizations in past year
  4. Inability to walk > 140 meters in 6 minutes
  5. Giant bulla > 1/3 of one lung's volume
  6. Previous lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or lobectomy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants

Interventions

  • DeviceExhale Drug-Eluting Stent
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Procedural and technical success - operatively

  2. Decrease in residual volume > 300mL from baseline

  3. Safety

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dyspnea scoring

  2. Pulmonary function measures

  3. Exercise tolerance

  4. Quality of life measures

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • The Prince Charles Hospital
    Rode Road, Chermside, Queensland 4032, Australia
  • The Alfred Hospital
    Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
    Burwood, 2134, Australia
  • Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia
    Porto Alegre, 90020-090, Brazil
  • Universitätsklinik des Saarlandes
    Homburg, Saarland 66421, Germany
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
08

References and documents

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2004, a primary completion of May 2006 and a completion of May 2006. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 12, 2005
First posted
Sep 21, 2005
Start
Jul 2004
Primary completionActual
May 2006
CompletionActual
May 2006
Last update
Jan 23, 2008
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00207337
Lead sponsor
Broncus Technologies
First posted
Sep 21, 2005
Start date
Jul 2004
Primary completion
May 2006
Completion
May 2006
Last update
Jan 23, 2008

Study contacts

Gregory I. Snell, MD
principal investigator · The Alfred
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion