An interventional study of Apical RV lead placement and Septal RV lead placement in Heart Block and Heart Failure, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-13.
Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study is to examine whether RV (right ventricular)septal pacing has any effect on LV ( left ventricular) function than RV apical pacing in patients who require ventricular pacing.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of RV pacing site on LV systolic function as measured by LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction).
Secondary objectives of this trial include:
72 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Block; 18 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 89 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Heart Block.
Browse Heart Block studies →London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 352 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
patient randomized to Septal RV lead placement
Device: Septal RV lead placement
patient randomized to Apical RV lead placement (current standard placement)
Device: Apical RV lead placement
RV lead implanted ( according to randomization )at the apex
RV lead is implanted (according to randomization), on septum
LV ejection fraction measured by radionuclide ventriculography (RVG).
Time frame: 2 weeks, 24 months and 36 months
Left ventricular diastolic and systolic function indices 2-D echocardiogram/Doppler (ECHO/DOPP).
Time frame: 36 months
All cause mortality.
Time frame: 36 months
Non-fatal thromboembolic events including stroke.
Time frame: 36 months
Heart failure hospitalization or intravenous drug therapy in an outpatient heart failure clinic.
Time frame: 36 months
Occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation or progression to permanent atrial fibrillation.
Time frame: 36 months
Symptoms and quality of life scores (DUke Activity Status Index, short form (SF)-12 scores.
Time frame: 2 weeks, 24 and 36 months
NYHA class using SAS survey, 6 minute hall walk distance.
Time frame: 2 weeks, 24 and 36 months
lead-related complications such as lead dislodgement, myocardial perforation, lead integrity failure, high pacing threshold
Time frame: 2 weeks, 24 and 36 months
total implant procedure and fluoroscopy time
Time frame: Implant
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's