CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00187447Updated Jun 4, 2008

Comparison of 2 Different Indomethacin Dosing Protocols to Treat Infants Delivered at <28 Weeks Gestation With a Persistent Patent Ductus Arteriosus

A Phase 2 interventional study of indomethacin (two different dosing regimens) in Patent Ductus Arteriosus, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 48 Hours. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-06-04.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 48 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine if a higher dose of indomethacin will increase the rate of ductus arteriosus closure in extremely premature infants without increasing the side effects. The long term objective is to find the optimal dosing of indomethacin for permanent closure of the Ductus and prevent the morbidity related to PDA and the complications of surgical ligation.

Read the detailed description

This study is a Phase II randomized, masked, controlled trial that compares the current standard dose of indomethacin to a higher dose for the closure of PDA in premature infants less than 28 weeks of gestation.

Neonates (\<28 weeks gestation) who are started on indomethacin treatment (with an initial 3-dose course: 0.2, 0.1, and 0.1 mg/kg of indomethacin) within the first 96 hr after birth will be eligible for this trial if they continue to have Doppler evidence of ductus patency before the third dose of indomethacin. This group of infants have greater than 65% chance of developing symptomatic PDA and surgical ligation even after our standard extended course of indomethacin. Those infants who do not fit the exclusion criteria will be randomized to either a Standard Dose group or to a Higher Dose group after obtaining consent. The infants randomized to the standard group will receive a 4th, 5th, and 6th dose of indomethacin (0.1 mg/kg) at 24 hr intervals (starting at 24 hr after the 3rd dose). The Higher Dose group infants delivered between 26-27 weeks gestation will receive a 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th dose of indomethacin (0.1mg/kg) at 12 hr intervals (starting 12 hr after the 3rd dose). The Higher Dose group infants between 24-25 weeks gestation will receive a 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th dose of indomethacin (0.25mg/kg) at 12 hour intervals (starting 12 hr after the 3rd dose). To keep the study blinded, the standard group will receive 3 extra doses of saline to match the 3 additional doses given to the higher dose group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Keywords

  • prematurity
  • chronic lung disease
  • necrotizing enterocolitis
  • indomethacin
  • ductus arteriosus
03

In context

Ductus Arteriosus, Patent

144 studies on the registry are indexed under Ductus Arteriosus, Patent; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 80 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Ductus Arteriosus, Patent.

Browse Ductus Arteriosus, Patent studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 48 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Newborn infants of less than 28 weeks gestational age who are treated with indomethacin during the first 48 hours after birth
  2. Presence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) by Doppler echocardiography between the second and third dose of indomethacin.
  3. Creatinine ≤1.8 mg/dl
  4. Platelets ≥ 50,000

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chromosomal disorders.
  2. Major congenital anomalies.
  3. Contraindications for indomethacin

    1. Necrotizing enterocolitis, by clinical or radiological evidence
    2. Evidence of bleeding diathesis as evidenced by pulmonary hemorrhage, persistent oozing from puncture sites, grossly bloody stool (Note: Infants with an intracranial hemorrhage can be enrolled in this study).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • Drugindomethacin (two different dosing regimens)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of ductus closure, as determined by echocardiography, following the last dose of study drug

  2. The incidence of the appearance of a symptomatic PDA following the last dose of study drug

  3. The incidence of ductus ligation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Altered renal function during treatment

  2. Incidence of Necrotizing enterocolitis

  3. Incidence of chronic lung disease

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • University of California San Francisco
    Davis, California 94143, United States
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Brown University
    Providence, Rhode Island, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00187447
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
First posted
Sep 16, 2005
Start date
Aug 2003
Primary completion
Jul 2006
Completion
Jul 2006
Last update
Jun 4, 2008

Study contacts

Ronald Clyman, M.D.
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2005. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion