CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00180687Updated Sep 15, 2015Results posted

Clinical Trial of the Use of Intraperitoneal Local Anaesthetic

A Phase 3 interventional study of Nebulised Bupivacaine intraperitoneally and Normal Saline in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-15.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients undergoing keyhole gall bladder removal will be divided into 3 groups, one control, one will have local anaesthetic and the third will have normal saline nebulised into their abdomen before closure of the wounds to reduce postoperative pain. These medications will be given on top of the standard pain management protocol.

Read the detailed description

Pain post laparoscopic procedures can be divided into access related, operation site and distension related. The access type can be attenuated by the use of sub dermal infiltration of local anaesthetic and rarely causes significant discomfort. It has been advocated that placement of a peritoneal gas drain significantly reduces postoperative pain particularly referred to the shoulder tip. Realistically, however, if attention is paid to expelling the residual gas at the end of the procedure this complication is rarely problematic. Operative site pain however is more difficult to manage. In limited gynaecological procedures it has been shown that local installation of local anaesthetic decreased the analgesic requirement of patients post operatively. These observations would not be as transferable to more extensive colorectal or solid organ surgery as the amount of local anaesthesia required would be toxic to the patient. Use of the nebuliser, however maybe able to alleviate pain by efficiently using the dosage required.

This is a prospective randomised double blind trial. Sixty patients will be allocated randomly between three groups, 20 patients in each group:

  1. Control group
  2. Nebulised intraperitoneal local anaesthetic (Bupivacaine 0.25%, 3mg/Kg)
  3. Nebulised intraperitoneal normal saline Ward staff will be blinded to which group the patients are in. All patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who have given written, informed consent are eligible for inclusion. Patients with local anaesthetics allergy and patients whom pain evaluation is considered unreliable due to chronic opiate use or neurological diseases are excluded.

No pre-medication is to be given and a standardised anaesthetic technique is to be employed for all patients.

Standard 4 ports technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be used with intraperitoneal pressure between 12-14 mmHg. This will be achieved using CO2 as the insufflation gas.

The local anaesthetic (approximately 10mls) will be delivered via a fine sterile catheter that will be inserted via the epigastric port under direct vision at the end of the procedure. Afterward the pneumoperitoneum will be deflated and the wound will be closed and subcutaneous local anaesthetic will be injected in and around the wounds.

Postoperatively, all the patients will have PCA as the main analgesia supported by NSAIDs unless contraindicated. Patients will eat and drink as desired and drips will be taken as soon as it is safe to do so.

Postoperative pain scoring will be stared in recovery and continue on the wards using the visual analogue scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Nebulisation
  • Cholecystectomy
  • Laparoscopic
  • Bupivacaine
  • Local Anaesthetic
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 824 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • All they patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with local anaesthetic allergy, patients on chronic opiate medication or those with neurological diseases that make pain evaluation unreliable will be excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    No intraperitoneal therapeutics (No nebulised Bupivacaine)

    Other: No Intraperitoneal Therapeutics

  • Placebo comparator
    IP Aerosolized Normal Saline

    Intraperitoneal nebulised 10mls. Normal Saline (No nebulised Bupivacaine)

    Drug: Normal Saline

  • Experimental
    Nebulised Bupivacaine intraperitoneally

    Intraperitoneal Nebulised 10mls. Bupivacaione (Marcaine)

    Drug: Nebulised Bupivacaine intraperitoneally

  • Active comparator
    Injected Bupivacaine intraperitoneally

    Intraperitoeal Injected 10 mls.Bupivacaine (Marcaine) (No nebulised Bupivacaine)

    Drug: Injected Bupivacaine intraperitoneally

Interventions

  • DrugNebulised Bupivacaine intraperitoneally

    Nebulised Marcaine (Bupivacaine)

    Also known as: Marcaine

  • DrugNormal Saline

    Nebulised Normal Saline

    Also known as: 0.9 % Normal Saline

  • DrugInjected Bupivacaine intraperitoneally

    Injected Marcaine directly into the peritoneal cavity

    Also known as: Marcaine

  • OtherNo Intraperitoneal Therapeutics

    No Intraperitoneal Therapeutics given

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in Postoperative Pain

    Postoperative pain was measured using Pain scale 0-10 (0 = No Pain, 10 = Maximum pain). A trained nursing staff will ask the patient about his / her pain and document that correctly in the chart. The staff will also document if the patient requires any analgesia, the type and the dose.

    Time frame: 0 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Vomiting / Nausea Episodes

    Nausea and vomiting are known adverse effect of opioids usage. By reducing the use of opioids we can reduce or abolish these side effect which will enhance early patient recovery and discharge and reduce hospital cost. We will measure the number of episodes when the patient suffers from these side effect and correlate them with opioids use.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Hours Needed for Safe Mobilization

    Drowsiness and delayed mobilization are known adverse effect of opioids usage. By reducing the use of opioids we can reduce or abolish these side effect which will enhance early patient recovery and discharge and reduce hospital cost. We will measure how many hours will take the patient to mobilize freely and safely and correlate them with opioids use.

    Time frame: 24 Hours

  3. Postoperative Morphine Use

    The reduction in cost comes from reducing the use of opioid which requires nursing supervision and also special pump to be delivered as in the cases of patient controlled analgesia. With that reduction, there will be a reduction in opioid related adverse events that mandate medical or nursing attention and prolong hospitalization, these adverse events include nausea and vomiting, delay mobilization due to drowsiness and alter mental status caused by opioid usage. For these reasons we are collecting data related to these adverse events

    Time frame: 24 Hoiurs

07

Results

Posted Sep 15, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally
Started20202020
Completed20202020
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryReduction in Postoperative Pain

Postoperative pain was measured using Pain scale 0-10 (0 = No Pain, 10 = Maximum pain). A trained nursing staff will ask the patient about his / her pain and document that correctly in the chart. The staff will also document if the patient requires any analgesia, the type and the dose.

Time frame:
0 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Reduction in Postoperative Pain
units on a scaleControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally
Pain in Recovery (0 Hours)9.2 (3 to 10)10 (10 to 10)3.3 (1 to 10)9.3 (5 to 10)
Pain at 6 hours8.2 (5 to 10)8.1 (4 to 10)0.7 (0 to 3)7.2 (4 to 10)
Pain at 12 hours7.9 (3 to 10)8 (4 to 10)0.6 (0 to 3)6.7 (4 to 10)
Pain at 24 hours6.1 (4 to 10)6.2 (2 to 10)0.5 (0 to 3)5.6 (3 to 8)
SecondaryNumber of Vomiting / Nausea Episodes

Nausea and vomiting are known adverse effect of opioids usage. By reducing the use of opioids we can reduce or abolish these side effect which will enhance early patient recovery and discharge and reduce hospital cost. We will measure the number of episodes when the patient suffers from these side effect and correlate them with opioids use.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Number of vomitting / Nausea episodes
Number of Vomiting / Nausea Episodes
Number of vomitting / Nausea episodesControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally
Number of Vomiting / Nausea Episodes7.1 (5 to 9)7.1 (3 to 8)2 (0 to 4)6.8 (2 to 9)
SecondaryHours Needed for Safe Mobilization

Drowsiness and delayed mobilization are known adverse effect of opioids usage. By reducing the use of opioids we can reduce or abolish these side effect which will enhance early patient recovery and discharge and reduce hospital cost. We will measure how many hours will take the patient to mobilize freely and safely and correlate them with opioids use.

Time frame:
24 Hours
Reported as:
Mean · Hours needed for safe mobilization
Hours Needed for Safe Mobilization
Hours needed for safe mobilizationControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally
Hours Needed for Safe Mobilization6.7 (4 to 10)6.5 (4 to 11)3 (2 to 4)6.4 (3 to 9)
SecondaryPostoperative Morphine Use

The reduction in cost comes from reducing the use of opioid which requires nursing supervision and also special pump to be delivered as in the cases of patient controlled analgesia. With that reduction, there will be a reduction in opioid related adverse events that mandate medical or nursing attention and prolong hospitalization, these adverse events include nausea and vomiting, delay mobilization due to drowsiness and alter mental status caused by opioid usage. For these reasons we are collecting data related to these adverse events

Time frame:
24 Hoiurs
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Postoperative Morphine Use
mgControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally
Postoperative Morphine Use25.9 (10 to 45)26.3 (10 to 50)1 (0 to 10)16.7 (8 to 30)

Adverse events

Collected over 24 Hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control—0/20 (0%)5/20 (25%)
IP Aerosolized Normal Saline—0/20 (0%)5/20 (25%)
Nebulised Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally—0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)
Injected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally—0/20 (0%)5/20 (25%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine Intraperitoneally
Nausea and VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/205/201/205/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)ControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyTotal
Mean47.65 (25 to 75)47.65 (26 to 74)51.60 (25 to 83)48.70 (34 to 79)49 (25 to 83)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyTotal
Female1618171869
Male423211
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlIP Aerosolized Normal SalineNebulised Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyInjected Bupivacaine IntraperitoneallyTotal
United Kingdom2020202080
08

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Mary's Hospital
    London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Alkhamesi NA, Peck DH, Lomax D, Darzi AW. Intraperitoneal aerosolization of bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):602-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9087-6. Epub 2006 Dec 16. PubMed 17180268 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00180687
Lead sponsor
Imperial College London
Responsible party
Nawar Alkhamesi (Clinical Research Fellow, Imperial College London) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2005
Start date
Oct 2004
Primary completion
Sep 2005
Completion
Sep 2005
Results posted
Sep 15, 2015
Last update
Sep 15, 2015

Study contacts

Nawar A Alkhamesi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion