A Phase 4 interventional study of Cytarabine Dosage in Leukemia, Nonlymphoblastic, Acute, sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2007-07-17.
Sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The AML96 study examines the feasibility of a risk-adapted postremission treatment strategy including related and unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation for high risk AML patients and related allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation for standard risk AML patients in a multi-center setting. Furthermore it randomizes patients between intermediate-dose Cytarabine vs high-dose Cytarabine within the first postremission-course.
The AML96 study examines the feasibility of a risk-adapted postremission treatment strategy including related and unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation for high risk AML patients and related allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation for standard risk AML patients in a multi-center setting. Furthermore it randomizes patients between intermediate-dose Cytarabine vs high-dose Cytarabine within the first postremission-course.
3,035 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 746 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 40 across 2,561 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.
Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →Technische Universität Dresden is the lead sponsor of 247 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
- rate of complete remission
- overall survival
- relapse-free survival
- frequencies and grade of treatment side effects
- deaths within induction therapy
- deaths within postremission therapy
- feasibility according to dosages and time-intervals
The record gives a start of Feb 1996 and a completion of Nov 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Technische Universität Dresden →