CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00176202Updated Nov 5, 2015Results posted

Risperidone and Divalproex Sodium With MRI Assessment in Pediatric Bipolar

A Phase 3 interventional study of Divalproex Sodium and risperidone in Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 20 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-05.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is to examine the null hypothesis that risperidone and divalproex sodium are equally effective in treating/stabilizing pediatric bipolar disorder.

Read the detailed description

Pediatric Bipolar Disorder (PBD) severely impairs a child's emotional development, and is associated with alarming rates of suicide, school failure, aggression, risk taking behaviors and substance abuse (Geller et al, 1998; 2001; Carlson et al, 1998). At present, very little is known about the pathophysiology or optimal treatment of PBD. The long range goals of this proposal are threefold: to investigate a range of pharmacotherapeutic agents that are safe and efficacious for PBD, to use fMRI techniques to examine abnormalities in brain function in this disorder, as well as any change in brain function after treatment.

In contrast to the adult literature, we are aware of only two prospective studies assessing the efficacy of standard mood stabilizers in a pediatric sample. In one, lithium was found to be moderately effective in PBD with comorbid substance abuse (Geller et al, 1998). In the other, divalproex sodium, lithium and carbamazepine produced a maximum of 50% symptom reduction (Kowatch et al, 2000). Subsequently, Kafantaris et al (2001) observed a potentiation of lithium's antimanic effect when combined with risperidone. Further, a prospective, open trial of olanzapine for PBD reported a 70% symptom reduction (Frazier et al, 2001) with a retention rate of 96% compared to only 7% with classic mood stabilizers (Kowatch et al, 2000).

Thus, parallelling adult studies (Sachs et al, 2000), novel antipsychotics are a promising treatment in this population. Further, up to 60% of acute PBD episodes present with psychotic features (Geller et al, in press). Finally, the time to full effect with mood stabilizers is often 4 weeks in children (Kowatch et al, 2000; Geller et al, 1998; Kafantaris et al, 2001), whereas antipsychotics usually have a more rapid response onset (Pavuluri et al, in press). Given the potential efficacy of novel antipsychotics for PBD, the aim is to conduct a randomized trial comparing a novel antipsychotic to a standard mood stabilizer:

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bipolar Disorder

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is close to the median of 64 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.

Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 515 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Children with Bipolar Disorder
  • Must be able to swallow tablets

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with general medical condition such as head injury, epilepsy, endocrine disorders
  • Those who are on mood altering medications such as steroids, and those diagnosed with mental retardation are excluded to avoid confounding and contributing factors to mood swings.
  • If we discover during the interview that the parent and/or child does not understand the consent/assent procedures, we will exclude them.

We expect only a small number of children to be excluded from the study due to exclusionary criteria. Selection of the subjects is not based on sex, race, or ethnic group.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Risperidone

    Risperidone is an antimanic medication and is a second generation antipsychotic

    Drug: risperidone

  • Active comparator
    Divalproex sodium

    Divalproex sodium is an antiepileptic medication and is a mood stabilizer

    Drug: Divalproex Sodium

Interventions

  • DrugDivalproex Sodium

    Divalproex sodium is a mood stabilizer

    Also known as: antiepileptic, valproic acid

  • Drugrisperidone

    Risperidone is a second generation antipsychotic and antimanic drug

    Also known as: antipsychotic, risperdal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

    This measure has 11 items. The purpose of each item is to rate the severity of that abnormality in the patient. A severity rating is assigned to each of the eleven items, based on the patient's subjective report of his or her condition over the previous forty-eight hours and the clinician's behavioral observations during the interview, with the emphasis on the latter. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Total score of zero to 60 is possible, zero being normal and 60 being severe, 12 serving as a cut off point for illness if equal or above. There are several ways to show change in outcome. We show the mean and standard deviation at week 0 and 6.

    Time frame: Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Child Depression Rating Scale- Revised (CDRS-R)

    Response for depressive symptoms was defined as a score less than 40 on the CDRS-R. Range is 18 to 120. Score 18 is normal and higher score signifies depression. The Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) is a 16-item measure used to determine the severity of depression in children 6-18 years of age. Items are measured on 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-point scales. The mean and standard deviation are measured in this study to illustrate outcome at baseline and when the subject ended the study.

    Time frame: Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

  2. Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)

    Child Mania rating scale is a parent rated measure to screen for symptoms of mania. It includes 21 items reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. Each item is answered on a four-point Likert type scale anchored by 0 (Never/Rare), 1 (Sometimes), 2 (Often), and 3 (Very Often). Maximum score possible is 63. Score higher than 20 is considered clinically significant, and this is a dimensional score of manic severity.

    Time frame: Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

  3. Clinical Global Improvement in Bipolar Disorder Overall (CGI-BP Overall)

    Severity of Illness and Global Improvement are rated on a 7-point scale by the clinician. In addition to rating the overall illness with the CGI-BP, severity and improvement are considered on various other dimensions such as mania, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity, psychosis, aggression and sleep difficulties. Score of 1, 2 and 3 would mean there is clinically observed symptom improvement where 1 is the best outcome than 2 or 3. The point 4 is the point where the subject presents at baseline of that specific individual. If they become worse on clinical symptoms, they are rated as 5, 6 or 7 where 7 is worse than 5.

    Time frame: Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).

07

Results

Posted Nov 5, 2015

Participant flow

Dates of recruitment :From Sep2005 - Jan 2008.in Clinic Subjects enrolled:65

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRisperidoneDivalproex Sodium
Started3233
Completed2717
Not completed516

Outcome measures

PrimaryYoung Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

This measure has 11 items. The purpose of each item is to rate the severity of that abnormality in the patient. A severity rating is assigned to each of the eleven items, based on the patient's subjective report of his or her condition over the previous forty-eight hours and the clinician's behavioral observations during the interview, with the emphasis on the latter. There are four items that are graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. Total score of zero to 60 is possible, zero being normal and 60 being severe, 12 serving as a cut off point for illness if equal or above. There are several ways to show change in outcome. We show the mean and standard deviation at week 0 and 6.

Time frame:
Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
units on a scaleDivalproexRisperidone
Baseline25.09 ± 7.5130.59 ± 7.04
Last observation carried forward (LOCF)15.24 ± 12.4910.22 ± 10.50
Statistical analysis
  • Divalproex · Chi-squared · p = <0.01
  • Risperidone · Chi-squared · p = <0.01
SecondaryChild Depression Rating Scale- Revised (CDRS-R)

Response for depressive symptoms was defined as a score less than 40 on the CDRS-R. Range is 18 to 120. Score 18 is normal and higher score signifies depression. The Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) is a 16-item measure used to determine the severity of depression in children 6-18 years of age. Items are measured on 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-point scales. The mean and standard deviation are measured in this study to illustrate outcome at baseline and when the subject ended the study.

Time frame:
Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Child Depression Rating Scale- Revised (CDRS-R)
units on a scaleDivalproexRisperidone
Baseline40.76 ± 13.3441.72 ± 17.44
Last Observation Carried Forward (p<.01)35.76 ± 15.0125.88 ± 9.13
Statistical analysis
  • Divalproex · Chi-squared · p = <.01
  • Risperidone · Chi-squared · p = 0.01
SecondaryChild Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)

Child Mania rating scale is a parent rated measure to screen for symptoms of mania. It includes 21 items reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. Each item is answered on a four-point Likert type scale anchored by 0 (Never/Rare), 1 (Sometimes), 2 (Often), and 3 (Very Often). Maximum score possible is 63. Score higher than 20 is considered clinically significant, and this is a dimensional score of manic severity.

Time frame:
Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).
Reported as:
Mean · units on scale
Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
units on scaleRisperidoneDivalproex Sodium
Baseline30.84 ± 10.8728.0 ± 9.02
LOCF16.35 ± 13.0919.20 ± 12.66
Statistical analysis
  • Risperidone · Chi-squared · p = <0.01 (In case of both risperidone and divalproex sodium.) · Effect size: -1.59
  • Divalproex Sodium · Chi-squared · p = <0.01 · Effect size: -1.33
SecondaryClinical Global Improvement in Bipolar Disorder Overall (CGI-BP Overall)

Severity of Illness and Global Improvement are rated on a 7-point scale by the clinician. In addition to rating the overall illness with the CGI-BP, severity and improvement are considered on various other dimensions such as mania, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity, psychosis, aggression and sleep difficulties. Score of 1, 2 and 3 would mean there is clinically observed symptom improvement where 1 is the best outcome than 2 or 3. The point 4 is the point where the subject presents at baseline of that specific individual. If they become worse on clinical symptoms, they are rated as 5, 6 or 7 where 7 is worse than 5.

Time frame:
Six week study with assessment at baseline and end of the study (at the end of 6 weeks or earlier if they ended the study before 6 week end point).
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinical Global Improvement in Bipolar Disorder Overall (CGI-BP Overall)
units on a scaleRisperidoneDivalproex Sodium
Baseline4.80 ± 1.064.37 ± 0.67
LOCF2.77 ± 1.282.97 ± 1.50
Statistical analysis
  • Risperidone · Chi-squared · p = <0.01
  • Divalproex Sodium · Chi-squared · p = <0.01

Adverse events

Collected over Weekly from baseline and for 6 weeks; 7 waves of data.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Risperidone—0/32 (0%)8/32 (25%)
Depakote or Divalproex Sodium—0/33 (0%)10/33 (30.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRisperidoneDepakote or Divalproex Sodium
Increased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders8/3210/33
Irritable/agitatedNervous system disorders0/327/33
stomach discomfortGastrointestinal disorders6/325/33
sleepinessNervous system disorders5/324/33
fatigue/tirednessNervous system disorders5/324/33
insomniaNervous system disorders0/324/33
weight gainMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/324/33

Baseline characteristics

AGE 10 TO 20 YRS GENDER :BOTH

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)RisperidoneDivalproexTotal
Mean10.47 ± 3.1811.23 ± 3.5010.85 ± 3.34
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RisperidoneDivalproexTotal
Female121426
Male201939
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)RisperidoneDivalproexTotal
United States323365
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Neuro Psychiatric Institute (NPI)
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • NPI, University of Illinois at Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • NPI
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pavuluri MN, Passarotti AM, Fitzgerald JM, Wegbreit E, Sweeney JA. Risperidone and divalproex differentially engage the fronto-striato-temporal circuitry in pediatric mania: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;51(2):157-170.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Dec 23. PubMed 22265362 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 5, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00176202
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Responsible party
Mani Pavuluri (Director of BRAIN Center, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2005
Start date
Apr 2003
Primary completion
Jan 2008
Completion
Jan 2008
Results posted
Nov 5, 2015
Last update
Nov 5, 2015

Study contacts

Mani Pavuluri, MD
principal investigator · University of Ilinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion