CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00175058AMIHOT IIUpdated Jun 18, 2012

Acute Myocardial Infarction With HyperOxemic Therapy II (AMIHOT II)

A Phase 3 interventional study of AO Therapy (aqueous oxygen) in Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by TherOx. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-18.

Sponsored by TherOx · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
317
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine whether or not HyperOxemic therapy rendered to patients (that meet the study inclusion criteria) with anterior acute myocardial infarction \< 6 hours from symptom onset to reperfusion, results in a significant reduction in infarct size as measured by SPECT @ 14 days post event.

Read the detailed description

The AMIHOT II clinical trial is designed as a focused study of a promising patient subset from the completed AMIHOT study. A brief synopsis of the AMIHOT experience is provided below, followed by a description of the AMIHOT II study.

The pivotal AMIHOT clinical study for the TherOx® Aqueous Oxygen (AO) System in treating post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients was approved by FDA on January 10, 2002 under IDE G980257/S011. The study objective was to determine whether the adjunctive administration of AO Therapy immediately after successful PCI in a group of patients presenting less than 24 hours from AMI symptom onset improves left ventricular function and reduces the area of infarction, with no increased incidence of 30-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) when compared to a control group receiving only PCI standard-of-care treatment. 30-day MACE comprises the combined incidence of death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke.

Two hundred eighty-nine (289) patients were enrolled from January 16, 2002 through December 24, 2003, including 20 run-in subjects and 269 randomized patients. Three independent biomarkers (infarct size reduction, regional wall motion score improvement at three months, and reduction in ST segment elevation) were designated as co-primary endpoints to evaluate the effectiveness of AO Therapy. The study was designed to demonstrate superiority of the AO Therapy group as compared to controls for each of these endpoints, and to demonstrate non-inferiority of the AO Therapy group as compared to Control with respect to 30-day MACE. The study population was comprised of qualifying AMI patients treated with either PCI alone or with AO Therapy as an adjunct to successful PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset.

The observed 30-day MACE rates were comparable between the AO Therapy and Control groups. The AMIHOT trial results revealed positive trends for the overall study population in favor of the AO Therapy test group in each of the three co-primary endpoints. These favorable results did not demonstrate the required level of statistical significance to claim superiority. However, an examination of a pre-specified patient subset, anterior AMI subjects treated within six hours of symptom onset, showed promising results after analysis of the surrogate endpoint data, forming the basis for this IDE supplement that requests approval to conduct a new trial focused on this further defined patient population.

TherOx has designed a follow-up clinical trial focused on these anterior AMI subjects treated within six hours, utilizing a Bayesian statistical design that incorporates both the existing AMIHOT data, and the new proposed AMIHOT II study data, into a hierarchical model for combined analysis.

The key differences between the proposed AMIHOT II study and the previously conducted AMIHOT trial are:

  • Focused target patient population - anterior AMI subjects revascularized within six hours of symptom onset. (AMIHOT included patients revascularized within 24 hours of symptom onset, irrespective of location of infarct.)
  • Single effectiveness endpoint - infarct size reduction as measured by 14-day Tc-99m Sestamibi SPECT imaging. (AMIHOT included 3 co-primary endpoints)
  • Non-inferiority comparison of 30-day MACE rates within a 6% safety delta (AMIHOT proposed an 8% delta.)
  • Randomization scheme - AMIHOT II will be randomized on a 2.8:1 (AO Therapy Group: Control Group) basis, as compared to the (1:1) randomization used in AMIHOT.

The method of administration of AO Therapy and the basic design of the AO System and AO Cartridge have not changed since the approval was granted by FDA to conduct the AMIHOT trial. The IDE number for the AMIHOT II clinical proposal is consistent with AMIHOT (G980257).

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • Heart Attack
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 317 is above the median of 148 across 1,595 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

TherOx is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Candidates for this study must meet ALL of the following criteria:

Pre-PCI:

  1. Patient must be >= 18 years of age
  2. AMI must be anterior
  3. Patient is experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with anterior AMI of \< 6 hour duration from time of symptom onset until admission to the emergency room
  4. Complete medical history, history of AMI, previous coronary interventions, list of medications given within last 24 hours
  5. 12-lead qualifying ECG criteria: Anterior infarction (ST-segment elevation > 1 mm in two or more contiguous leads between V1 and V4 or new left bundle branch block (LBBB) with documentation of LAD system culprit lesion)
  6. Patient provides written, Informed Consent
  7. Patient and his/her physician agree to all required follow-up procedures and visits
  8. Women of childbearing potential who have a negative pregnancy test (applies to female patients only)

    ANGIOGRAPHIC INCLUSION CRITERIA: These are evaluated after the subject has provided signed Informed Consent but prior to randomization:

  9. Based on coronary anatomy, PCI is indicated for culprit lesion with anticipated use of an Intra-Coronary Stent
  10. TIMI 0, I, or II flow is present on the initial angiographic injection of the infarct-related artery
  11. Successful angioplasty as documented by \< 50% diameter residual angiographic stenosis within and associated with the culprit lesion and ³ TIMI II flow and no major complications such as perforation or shock
  12. Documented time of reperfusion is \< 6 hours from the documented time of symptom onset

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Candidates will be excluded from this study if ANY of the following conditions apply:

Pre-PCI:

  1. Patients with ventricular pseudoaneurysm, VSD, or papillary muscle rupture.
  2. Absolute contraindications to anticoagulant therapy, including hemorrhagic diathesis or thrombocytopenia
  3. Systemic Arterial pO2 is \< 80 mmHg with supplemental oxygen
  4. Placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
  5. Patient has had coronary bypass surgery during the 30 day period preceding PCI
  6. Severe known cardiac valvular stenosis or insufficiency, pericardial disease, or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
  7. Patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation for > 10 minutes
  8. Cardiogenic shock (SBP \< 80 mm Hg for more than 30 minutes unresponsive to fluids or requiring intravenous pressors or placement of an IABP)
  9. Expected survival of less than 6 months due to non-cardiac condition
  10. Current participation in other investigational device or drug trials that have not finished the primary efficacy endpoint follow-up parameters
  11. Patient has had a hemorrhagic stroke during the 6 month period preceding PCI
  12. Physician discretion regarding unacceptability for enrollment

    ANGIOGRAPHIC EXCLUSION CRITERIA: These are evaluated after the subject has provided signed Informed Consent but prior to randomization:

  13. Any proximal coronary diameter stenosis > 40 % that would restrict native flow with the Tracker-38 infusion catheter in place
  14. Infarct-related vessels that are either saphenous vein grafts and/or small second order coronary vessels that do not supply significant areas of myocardium
  15. Presence of a non-stented coronary dissection upon completion of the PCI procedure
  16. Unprotected left main diameter stenosis > 60%
  17. Severe target vessel calcification or tortuosity
  18. Multi - vessel disease that in the judgment of the investigator is best treated with emergent or urgent CABG or additional PCI within 30 days
  19. In the investigator's opinion, the target vessel is unsuitable for either placing the infusion catheter or treatment with PCI
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
317 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    1

    Control - Patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction revascularized by means of PCI with stenting within 6 hours of onset of symptoms, no experimental intervention

  • Experimental
    2

    AO Therapy group - anterior acute myocardial infarction patients revascularized by means of PCI with stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset, receiving adjunctive infusion of hyperoxemic blood into target coronary artery for 90 minutes post-PCI.

    Device: AO Therapy (aqueous oxygen)

Interventions

  • DeviceAO Therapy (aqueous oxygen)

    90-min adjunctive reperfusion of hyperoxemic blood into target coronary artery, immediately following revascularization by means of PCI with stenting

    Also known as: AO Therapy, SSO2 Therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A single SPECT scan will be used to determine whether or not the treatment results in a significant reduction in infarct size in the treatment group. The scan is performed 14 days post-event.

    Time frame: 14 +/- 7 days

  2. Safety will be determined by comparing 30-day MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) rates, where MACE is comprised by the combined incidence of death, stroke, repeat MI, and target vessel revascularization.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. ST elevation reduction will be compared between the two randomized groups at 3, 4, and 6 hours post-intervention

    Time frame: 3, 4, and 6 hrs post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bryn Mawr Hospital
    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stone GW, Martin JL, de Boer MJ, Margheri M, Bramucci E, Blankenship JC, Metzger DC, Gibbons RJ, Lindsay BS, Weiner BH, Lansky AJ, Krucoff MW, Fahy M, Boscardin WJ; AMIHOT-II Trial Investigators. Effect of supersaturated oxygen delivery on infarct size after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(5):366-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.840066. Epub 2009 Sep 15. PubMed 20031745 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00175058
Lead sponsor
TherOx
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2005
Start date
Aug 2005
Primary completion
Jun 2007
Completion
May 2008
Last update
Jun 18, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion