CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00168064Updated Oct 31, 2012Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Nitrogen Mustard in Treatment of Mycosis Fungoides

A Phase 2 interventional study of mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) in Mycosis Fungoides, sponsored by Yaupon Therapeutics. Completed at 12 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-31.

Sponsored by Yaupon Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
260
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of the topical application of mechlorethamine (MCH) formulations in patients with stage I or IIA mycosis fungoides (MF).

Read the detailed description

The successful use of mechlorethamine (MCH) as a topical agent in the treatment of mycosis fungoides, a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, was first reported in the late 1950s, and provided a rationale for skin-directed chemotherapy that minimized systemic toxicity. Since then, multiple investigators have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of topically applied MCH in the treatment of mycosis fungoides. This study will evaluate the efficacy (non-inferiority), tolerability and safety of topical application of MCH proprietary gel versus a compounded ointment formulation in Aquaphor in patients with stage I or IIA MF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mycosis Fungoides

Keywords

  • Mycosis Fungoides
  • Nitrogen Mustard
  • Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
  • CTCL - Mycosis Fungoides
03

In context

Mycoses

539 studies on the registry are indexed under Mycoses; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 260 is above the median of 46 across 358 interventional studies indexed under Mycoses.

Browse Mycoses studies →

Lead sponsor

Yaupon Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with mycosis fungoides confirmed by a skin biopsy
  • Stage I or IIA patients must have been treated previously with prior topical therapies including PUVA, UVB, topical steroids, but not NM within the past 2 years, or topical carmustine (BCNU)
  • Patients must be otherwise healthy with acceptable organ function.
  • Prior to initiating study therapy, patients must not have had topical therapy within four weeks
  • Lab values within normal range
  • Willing/able to give consent
  • Must use effective means of contraception if of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed mycosis fungoides with no prior therapy
  • A prior history of treatment with topical NM within the past 2 years or topical carmustine (BCNU)
  • Use of topical or systemic therapies for MF within four (4) weeks of entry in the study
  • Patients with a diagnosis of stage IIB-IV MF
  • Serious known concurrent medical illness or infection, which could potentially present a safety risk and/or prevent compliance with the requirements of the treatment program
  • Pregnant or nursing females, or males and females of childbearing potential, not using an effective means of contraception
  • Patients who have had radiation therapy within one year of study start
  • Patients who have a history of a higher T score than T2 or a higher N score than N1
  • Patients who do not agree to do all labs at one site
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
260 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1 (PG - NM (MCH) 0.02%)

    PG - mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% gel To evaluate the tolerability and safety of topical mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% ointment formulations in patients with stage I or IIA MF

    Drug: mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)

  • Active comparator
    2 (AP - MCH(NM) 0.02%)

    AP - mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% compounded in Aquaphor To evaluate the tolerability and safety of mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)0.02% ointment formulations in patients with stage I or IIA MF

    Drug: mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)

Interventions

  • Drugmechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard)

    All affected areas (lesions) are to be treated once daily for twelve months with mechlorethamine-MCH (nitrogen mustard) 0.02% PG or NM 0.02% AP ointment

    Also known as: mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ratio of Response Rates Based on CAILS

    The ratio of the response rate of the patients treated with the PG formulation to the response rate of the patients treated with the AP formulation. Skin response determined by at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) following up to 12 months of treatment

    Time frame: Assessment made at Day 1 and every subsequent visit during treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity-weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT) Within up to 12 Months by 2 or More Consecutive Observations Over at Least 4 Weeks

    Time frame: Assessment made at Day 1 and every subsequent visit during treatment

  2. Percent of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Improvement of Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT)

    Assessment of lesion distribution and severity. A responder analysis was performed on whether subject achieved at least 50% improvement on scale. This had to be confirmed on at least one visit at least 4 weeks apart.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of therapy

07

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePG -Mechlorethamine (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine 0.02% Compounded in Aquaphor
Started130130
Completed8186
Not completed4944
Withdrew: Adverse event2622
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject34
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy44
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up43
Withdrew: Non-compliance23
Withdrew: Concurrent illness43
Withdrew: Subject's best interest22
Withdrew: Various43

Outcome measures

PrimaryRatio of Response Rates Based on CAILS

The ratio of the response rate of the patients treated with the PG formulation to the response rate of the patients treated with the AP formulation. Skin response determined by at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) following up to 12 months of treatment

Time frame:
Assessment made at Day 1 and every subsequent visit during treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Ratio of Response Rates Based on CAILS
percentage of participantsPG- Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% GelAP- Aquaphor Formulation Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02%
Ratio of Response Rates Based on CAILS7662
Statistical analysis
  • PG- Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% Gel vs AP- Aquaphor Formulation Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% · ANCOVA · Ratio of proportions: 1.226 · 95% CI 0.974 to 1.552ratio is response rate of PG formulation divided by response rate of AP formulation
SecondarySeverity-weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT) Within up to 12 Months by 2 or More Consecutive Observations Over at Least 4 Weeks
Time frame:
Assessment made at Day 1 and every subsequent visit during treatment

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryPercent of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Improvement of Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT)

Assessment of lesion distribution and severity. A responder analysis was performed on whether subject achieved at least 50% improvement on scale. This had to be confirmed on at least one visit at least 4 weeks apart.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of therapy
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percent of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Improvement of Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT)
Percent of participantsPG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in Aquaphor
Percent of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Improvement of Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (SWAT)6160

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data were collected over 12 months of the patient's participation. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG Gel—0/128 (0%)108/128 (84.4%)
AP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in Aquaphor—0/127 (0%)99/127 (78%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in Aquaphor
skin irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders32/12818/127
pruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders25/12820/127
erythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders22/12818/127
dermatitis contactSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders19/12819/127
upper respiratory tract infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/12810/127
skin hyperpigmentationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders7/1289/127
folliculitisInfections and infestations7/1285/127

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in AquaphorTotal
<=18 years011
Between 18 and 65 years9386179
>=65 years374380
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)PG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in AquaphorTotal
Mean54.7 ± 14.2056.7 ± 14.3455.7 ± 14.28
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in AquaphorTotal
Female5353106
Male7777154
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PG -Mechlorethamine-MCH (Nitrogen Mustard) 0.02% PG GelAP- Mechlorethamine-MCH (NM) 0.02% Compounded in AquaphorTotal
United States130130260
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Stanford University Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Northwestern University - Dept. of Dermatology
    Chicago, Illinois 61611, United States
  • NYU Medical Center Dept. of Dermatology
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Columbia University, Dept. of Dermatology
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Oklahoma University
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111-2497, United States
  • University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Utah Clinical Trials, LLC
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
  • University of Wisconsin
    Madison, Wisconsin 53791, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim YH, Martinez G, Varghese A, Hoppe RT. Topical nitrogen mustard in the management of mycosis fungoides: update of the Stanford experience. Arch Dermatol. 2003 Feb;139(2):165-73. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.2.165. PubMed 12588222 ↗
  • Kim YH. Management with topical nitrogen mustard in mycosis fungoides. Dermatol Ther. 2003;16(4):288-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2003.01640.x. PubMed 14686971 ↗
  • Kim YH, Jensen RA, Watanabe GL, Varghese A, Hoppe RT. Clinical stage IA (limited patch and plaque) mycosis fungoides. A long-term outcome analysis. Arch Dermatol. 1996 Nov;132(11):1309-13. PubMed 8915308 ↗
  • Querfeld C, Scarisbrick JJ, Assaf C, Kim YH, Guitart J, Quaglino P, Hodak E. Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Jul;23(4):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00687-y. Epub 2022 May 10. PubMed 35536441 ↗
  • Querfeld C, Scarisbrick JJ, Assaf C, Guenova E, Bagot M, Ortiz-Romero PL, Quaglino P, Bonizzoni E, Hodak E. Post hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Assess Response Rates with Chlormethine/Mechlorethamine Gel in Patients with Stage IA-IIA Mycosis Fungoides. Dermatology. 2022;238(2):347-357. doi: 10.1159/000516138. Epub 2021 Jun 4. PubMed 34091453 ↗
  • Lessin SR, Duvic M, Guitart J, Pandya AG, Strober BE, Olsen EA, Hull CM, Knobler EH, Rook AH, Kim EJ, Naylor MF, Adelson DM, Kimball AB, Wood GS, Sundram U, Wu H, Kim YH. Topical chemotherapy in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: positive results of a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial testing the efficacy and safety of a novel mechlorethamine, 0.02%, gel in mycosis fungoides. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jan;149(1):25-32. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamadermatol.541. PubMed 23069814 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00168064
Lead sponsor
Yaupon Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2005
Start date
May 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2010
Completion
Aug 2011
Results posted
Oct 31, 2012
Last update
Oct 31, 2012

Study contacts

Stuart Lessin, M.D.
study director · Fox Chase Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion