CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00138957Updated Jul 11, 2008

Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh

An interventional study of Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with mesh in Hernia and Abdominal Hernia, sponsored by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-07-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
too few patients included
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate a new laparoscopic technique for parastomal hernia repair using an intraperitoneally placed Proceed mesh, looking at postoperative complications, recurrence rate and postoperative pain and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Parastomal hernia affects up to 50% of all patients following formation of a stoma, most often in patients with a colostomy. About 20% of the patients need surgical correction of their parastomal hernia. Symptoms associated with parastomal hernias goes from mild physical (pain) and cosmetic discomfort to life threatening conditions with obstruction, strangulation and perforation. Parastomal hernias have big socioeconomic consequences and remain a considerable clinical problem.

The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is controversial. The best way to treat it is to restore the continuity of the intestine, but in permanent stomas, this is not an option. Many surgical techniques have been described when intervention is required, but the results are unacceptable. The traditional open techniques are local simple suturing of the fascia defect, stoma relocation, or repair with a prosthetic material either intraperitoneally or extraperitoneally (subfascial or onlay). Overall, the results of all methods are poor with high recurrence rates and high morbidity and mortality. Mesh repair has the lowest recurrence rate (0-39%) and stoma relocation and simple suture has reported recurrence rates on 0-76% and 46-100%, respectively. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias with a prosthetic mesh inserted intraperitoneally is a new method described in a few small series. The results so far are encouraging, but the follow-up period is short.

Looking at the disappointing results from the traditional open techniques in the treatment of parastomal hernias together with the enormous success in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and laparoscopy overall, we believe that laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with mesh will be an effective treatment option in the future. Therefore, we find it interesting to investigate the technique in a prospective study

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia
  • Abdominal Hernia

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair
  • Intraperitoneally
  • Mesh
  • Quality of life
  • Postoperative pain
  • Recurrence
03

In context

Hernia

1,096 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Hernia.

Browse Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 - 80 years
  • Indication for laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair in general anaesthesia.
  • Danish speaking
  • ASA group I-III
  • No remaining malignancy after former primary radical operation for colorectal cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Former operation (open/lap) for parastomal hernia with insertion of mesh, or other mesh operation in the area of herniation
  • Incarcerated hernia (acute operation)
  • History of abuse or permanent morphine use
  • Expected bad compliance
  • Current systemic steroid use or other immuno-suppressive treatment
  • HIV-positive, pregnant or breast feeding
  • Medical conditions contraindicating general anaesthesia
  • Simultaneous operation for other ventral, inguinal or umbilical hernia
  • Epidural or spinal anaesthesia
  • Conversion to open procedure
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with mesh
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of parastomal hernia after 6 months (ultrasound and clinical)

  2. Postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS 0-100, Verbal Rating Scale, VRS 0-3)

  3. Stricture of stoma (Bougie, mm)

  4. Quality of life (SF-36 and Ostomy Adjustment Scale (OAS))

  5. General well-being (VAS 0-100)

  6. Postoperative ileus/paralysis > 24 hours

  7. Patient's satisfaction (VAS 0-100)

  8. Bandage problems (VRS 0-3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical and surgical complications

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00138957
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
Collaborators
Ethicon, Inc.
First posted
Aug 30, 2005
Start date
Sep 2005
Completion
Dec 2007 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 11, 2008

Study contacts

Jacob Rosenberg, Prof, MD
principal investigator · Gentofte University Hospital, Dept. of Surgery
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion