CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00129441Updated Oct 17, 2011Results posted

Gamma-Amino Butyric Acid (GABA)-A Alpha2/3 Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of Merck L-830982 and Placebo in Schizophrenia, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-10-17.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine whether a short-term administration of an investigational study drug may provide evidence of improvement in cognitive functioning in a group of stable male subjects with schizophrenia.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to determine whether the short-term (4 week), double-blind administration of Merck L-830982 provides evidence of improvement in cognitive functioning in stable male subjects with schizophrenia. This initial, small sample size study (n=9 on L-830982 and n=6 on placebo) is restricted to males in order to reduce the variance that might be attributable to the well-documented sex differences in the clinical features of schizophrenia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • schizophrenia
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,470 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 471 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 70 across 2,871 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male participants
  • Between the ages of 18 and 50
  • Meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • Are clinically stable for a minimum of 3 months on current dose of medication
  • Are unemployed (i.e., work less than 20 hours per week at competitive employment)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychoactive substance dependence within the past 6 months or substance abuse within the past month
  • History of head trauma or other neurological disorder
  • Medical illness or medications, such as benzodiazepine treatment or HIV medications, that may be affected by study participation (the study doctor will discuss this with potential subjects)
  • Mental retardation
  • Seizure disorder
  • History of a heart attack, arrhythmia, or other heart disease
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Merck L-830982

    Drug: Merck L-830982

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar pill

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugMerck L-830982

    The initial dose of L-830982 was 3.0 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) the dosage increased to 5.0 mg b.i.d. at the end of week 1 and 8.0 mg b.i.d. at the end of week 2, which was continued for the remaining 2 weeks of the trial. Medications were dispensed weekly in blister packs by the hospital pharmacy.

    Also known as: MK-0777

  • DrugPlacebo

    Medications were dispensed weekly in blister packs by the hospital pharmacy, using the same number of pills as those on active drug.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. N-back Task - Reaction Time

    The N-back task is a sequential-letter memory task for which working memory load is varied, as the respondent must indicate when the current stimulus matches the one from 'n' steps earlier in the sequence. The dependent measure for the N-back task was performance in the 2-back condition, which provides the best index of performance and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disturbances in subjects with schizophrenia.

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. N-back Task - Error Rate

    The N-back task is a sequential-letter memory task for which working memory load is varied, as the respondent must indicate when the current stimulus matches the one from 'n' steps earlier in the sequence. The dependent measure for the N-back task was performance in the 2-back condition, which provides the best index of performance and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disturbances in subjects with schizophrenia.

    Time frame: Week 4

  3. AX Continuous Performance Test Task D-prime

    For the AX Continuous Performance Test, subjects are required to maintain an attentional set across a delay interval in order to overcome a prepotent response tendency (target responses are required when an X is presented but only in the context of a preceding A; non-target conditions are AY, BX and BY). The dependent measure was d-prime at the long delay (calculated as AX hits minus BX false alarms, which is particularly sensitive to context processing impairments in individuals with schizophrenia.

    Time frame: Week 4

  4. Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task - Reaction Time

    The POP task is a cued stimulus-response reversal paradigm that, similar to the AX Continuous Performance Test, requires increases in cognitive control through the maintenance and use of context information to overcome prepotent response tendencies.

    Time frame: Week 4

  5. Preparing to Overcome Prepotency Task - Error Rate

    The POP task is a cued stimulus-response reversal paradigm that, similar to the AX Continuous Performance Test, requires increases in cognitive control through the maintenance and use of context information to overcome prepotent response tendencies.

    Time frame: Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total Score

    The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-anchored (BPRS; Overall and Gorham, 1962; Woerner, Mannuzza, Kane, 1988) is an 18-item scale that is among the most widely used measure of psychopathology. Scores range from 1-7, with higher scores reflecting greater pathology. A total score is derived from the sum of all 18 items (possible scores range from 18-126). It relies on clinical judgment in the assessment of key areas of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, psychosis).

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score

    Five index scores are computed from the RBANS (immediate memory, language, visuospatial, attention, delayed memory) that are combined to provide the Total Score. The Total Score is expressed as a standardized score normalized to a population mean of 100, with a standard deviation of 15 (possible scores 40-135). Higher scores reflect better performance. All subjects received the "A" form at baseline and the wk-4 visit and the "B" form at the wk-2 visit (the A/B forms are equivalent alternate forms, which allow for retesting patients without the confound of practice effects).

    Time frame: Week 4

  3. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status - Delayed Memory Subindex

    The Delayed Memory Index consists of verbal and nonverbal recall tasks (words, drawings) that the subject views early in the evaluation and without warning, is asked to recall \~1/2 hr later. Scores are expressed as standardized scores normalized to a population mean of 100, with a standard deviation of 15 (possible scores between 40-135). Higher scores reflect better performance. Subjects received the "A" form at baseline and wk-4 visit and the "B" form at the wk-2 visit (A/B forms are equivalent alternate forms, which allow for retesting patients without the confound of practice effects).

    Time frame: Week 4

07

Results

Posted Oct 17, 2011
Limitations and caveats
Small sample size; RBANS may lack appropriate sensitivity for short-term study; between-group differences in baseline clinical symptoms \& neuropsychological function; excluding those with more modest cognitive impairments (RBANS standard score \>90).

Participant flow

Participants were recruited through referrals from clinicians in the outpatient clinical services at Western Psychiatric Institute \& Clinic and through a Psychosis Registry. 29 males signed consent and 16 were eligible-one subject did not complete the study and is not included in any summary statistics. Recruitment period: 4/05 through 1/07.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneL-830982Placebo
Started96
Baseline, visit 196
Week 1, visit 296
Week 2, visit 396
Week 3, visit 496
Week 4, visit 596
Week 5, visit 696
Week 26, visit 796
Year 1, visit 896
Completed96
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryN-back Task - Reaction Time

The N-back task is a sequential-letter memory task for which working memory load is varied, as the respondent must indicate when the current stimulus matches the one from 'n' steps earlier in the sequence. The dependent measure for the N-back task was performance in the 2-back condition, which provides the best index of performance and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disturbances in subjects with schizophrenia.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · msec
N-back Task - Reaction Time
msecL-830982Placebo
N-back Task - Reaction Time786 ± 231684 ± 101
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.16
PrimaryN-back Task - Error Rate

The N-back task is a sequential-letter memory task for which working memory load is varied, as the respondent must indicate when the current stimulus matches the one from 'n' steps earlier in the sequence. The dependent measure for the N-back task was performance in the 2-back condition, which provides the best index of performance and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disturbances in subjects with schizophrenia.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of errors
N-back Task - Error Rate
proportion of errorsL-830982Placebo
N-back Task - Error Rate0.239 ± 0.0620.297 ± 0.075
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.162
PrimaryAX Continuous Performance Test Task D-prime

For the AX Continuous Performance Test, subjects are required to maintain an attentional set across a delay interval in order to overcome a prepotent response tendency (target responses are required when an X is presented but only in the context of a preceding A; non-target conditions are AY, BX and BY). The dependent measure was d-prime at the long delay (calculated as AX hits minus BX false alarms, which is particularly sensitive to context processing impairments in individuals with schizophrenia.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · d-prime
AX Continuous Performance Test Task D-prime
d-primeL-830982Placebo
AX Continuous Performance Test Task D-prime1.9 ± 0.90.7 ± 0.9
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.12
PrimaryPreparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task - Reaction Time

The POP task is a cued stimulus-response reversal paradigm that, similar to the AX Continuous Performance Test, requires increases in cognitive control through the maintenance and use of context information to overcome prepotent response tendencies.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · msec
Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task - Reaction Time
msecL-830982Placebo
Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task - Reaction Time57 ± 6666 ± 55
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.05
PrimaryPreparing to Overcome Prepotency Task - Error Rate

The POP task is a cued stimulus-response reversal paradigm that, similar to the AX Continuous Performance Test, requires increases in cognitive control through the maintenance and use of context information to overcome prepotent response tendencies.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of errors
Preparing to Overcome Prepotency Task - Error Rate
proportion of errorsL-830982Placebo
Preparing to Overcome Prepotency Task - Error Rate0.042 ± 0.0420.031 ± 0.074
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.249
SecondaryBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total Score

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-anchored (BPRS; Overall and Gorham, 1962; Woerner, Mannuzza, Kane, 1988) is an 18-item scale that is among the most widely used measure of psychopathology. Scores range from 1-7, with higher scores reflecting greater pathology. A total score is derived from the sum of all 18 items (possible scores range from 18-126). It relies on clinical judgment in the assessment of key areas of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, psychosis).

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total Score
Scores on a scaleL-830982Placebo
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total Score26.3 ± 5.327.0 ± 3.0
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.01
SecondaryRepeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score

Five index scores are computed from the RBANS (immediate memory, language, visuospatial, attention, delayed memory) that are combined to provide the Total Score. The Total Score is expressed as a standardized score normalized to a population mean of 100, with a standard deviation of 15 (possible scores 40-135). Higher scores reflect better performance. All subjects received the "A" form at baseline and the wk-4 visit and the "B" form at the wk-2 visit (the A/B forms are equivalent alternate forms, which allow for retesting patients without the confound of practice effects).

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Standard Score
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score
Standard ScoreL-830982Placebo
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Total Score76.7 ± 13.570.8 ± 12.4
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = <0.05
SecondaryRepeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status - Delayed Memory Subindex

The Delayed Memory Index consists of verbal and nonverbal recall tasks (words, drawings) that the subject views early in the evaluation and without warning, is asked to recall \~1/2 hr later. Scores are expressed as standardized scores normalized to a population mean of 100, with a standard deviation of 15 (possible scores between 40-135). Higher scores reflect better performance. Subjects received the "A" form at baseline and wk-4 visit and the "B" form at the wk-2 visit (A/B forms are equivalent alternate forms, which allow for retesting patients without the confound of practice effects).

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Standard Score
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status - Delayed Memory Subindex
Standard ScoreL-830982Placebo
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status - Delayed Memory Subindex85.3 ± 15.763.8 ± 17.6
Statistical analysis
  • L-830982 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = <0.05

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected at all timepoints during the 5-week clinical trial. Eye exams were conducted at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
L-830982—0/10 (0%)4/10 (40%)
Placebo—0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventL-830982Placebo
DizzinessGeneral disorders2/100/6
SomnolenceGeneral disorders2/100/6
Appetite increaseGeneral disorders1/100/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)L-830982PlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years9615
>=65 years000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)L-830982PlaceboTotal
Mean39.3 ± 10.635.7 ± 6.837.9 ± 9.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)L-830982PlaceboTotal
Female000
Male9615
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)L-830982PlaceboTotal
United States9615
N-back Task Reaction Time
N-back Task Reaction Time(msec)L-830982PlaceboTotal
Mean874 ± 238669 ± 158801 ± 230
N-back Task Error Rate
N-back Task Error Rate(proportion of errors)L-830982PlaceboTotal
Mean0.247 ± 0.1020.250 ± 0.0280.248 ± 0.081
AX Continuous Performance Test Task d-prime
AX Continuous Performance Test Task d-prime(d-prime)L-830982PlaceboTotal
Mean0.9 ± 0.70.7 ± 0.90.8 ± 0.7
Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task - Reaction Time
Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task - Reaction Time(msec)L-830982PlaceboTotal
Mean66 ± 4836 ± 6154 ± 53

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lewis DA, Hashimoto T, Volk DW. Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Apr;6(4):312-24. doi: 10.1038/nrn1648. PubMed 15803162 ↗
  • Lewis DA, Volk DW, Hashimoto T. Selective alterations in prefrontal cortical GABA neurotransmission in schizophrenia: a novel target for the treatment of working memory dysfunction. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Jun;174(1):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1673-x. Epub 2003 Dec 9. PubMed 15205885 ↗
  • Lewis DA, Cho RY, Carter CS, Eklund K, Forster S, Kelly MA, Montrose D. Subunit-selective modulation of GABA type A receptor neurotransmission and cognition in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;165(12):1585-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030395. Epub 2008 Oct 15. Erratum In: Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;166(1):120. PubMed 18923067 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00129441
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2005
Start date
Aug 2005
Primary completion
Jan 2008
Completion
Jan 2008
Results posted
Oct 17, 2011
Last update
Oct 17, 2011

Study contacts

David A Lewis, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion