CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00128206Updated Jul 21, 2020Results posted

Treatment of Latent TB Infection for Jailed Persons

A Phase 3 interventional study of Isoniazid and Rifampin in Tuberculosis, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-21.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
364
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an alternative drug, (rifampin) given daily, is better at treating tuberculosis (TB) and more tolerable than the usual drug treatment, isoniazid (INH). Study participants will include 972, TB infected, San Francisco Jail inmates, aged 18 or older. One group of volunteers will take INH two times a week for 9 months, and the other group will take rifampin daily for 4 months. Medication will be administered in jail and at the San Francisco TB Clinic if the volunteer is released from jail prior to completing the study. Participants will be seen daily for 4 months (rifampin group), and 2 times a week for 9 months (INH group) for directly observed therapy. Study procedures will include 5 symptom review visits and blood samples for lab testing. Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effect of two accepted regimens for treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in jail. Tuberculosis (TB) in incarcerated populations continues to be a serious problem, due to the large proportion of persons who are at high risk of both having latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developing active disease. Completion of treatment of LTBI, while an important component of overall TB control efforts, has not been successful in jails. This is primarily because inmates are frequently released before finishing a 6-9 month course of standard therapy, and have low rates of completing therapy in the community. This study proposes to look at toxicity and adherence for this 4-month regimen compared to the nine-month regimen of to isoniazid (INH), and to examine costs, both cost of delivered care and the cost of TB disease prevented, with examination of reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Short-course therapies for LTBI may address this problem but they are more expensive and have not been studied adequately to answer questions about side effects, completion rates, and overall cost. The investigators propose a randomized trial to test the effects of a short course therapy, rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months, as compared to (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months. Both regimens are listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Thoracic Society as acceptable treatments for persons with LTBI. The study participants will include 972 San Francisco Jail inmates, 18 years and older, enrolled over a 28-month period, for a sample of 486 in each study group. Subjects, followed in jail and after release, will be followed to test three hypotheses: the null hypothesis of a difference in toxicity of rifampin as compared to INH within a 95% confidence interval of (.4-1.87) and no difference by study group in adherence and in cost-effectiveness. A secondary aim is to describe reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Toxicity is defined as complications leading to stopping drug. Adherence is defined as completion of care, or 120 doses taken within 6 months for the rifampin group and 76 doses of INH taken within 12 months for the INH group. Cost effectiveness will be calculated as the total cost of care (nursing, medical, laboratory, as well as facility costs), and measured against costs of TB cases prevented. All treatments will be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT) in jail, and by DOT after release at the San Francisco TB Clinic. Counseling on adherence (going to the TB Clinic if released before completing therapy) and on possible side effects will be given to all study subjects at enrollment and during follow-up clinic visits. All subjects will be routinely evaluated by study personnel every two weeks for the first 6 weeks, and thereafter to detect possible drug toxicity including hepatitis, peripheral neuropathy, arthralgias, rash, memory loss, and other clinical symptoms. All patients will undergo laboratory assessment at regular intervals according to a schedule which compares study group participation and the usual care in the jail. All blood test results, and new symptoms or changes in symptoms found at follow-up, will be added to the jail medical record. A final interview will be done with subjects at the time that they have completed or not completed this course of therapy for LTBI, to determine reasons (barriers and enablers). Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study, to measure study endpoint (completion of care, taken off drugs for toxicity or loss to follow-up) and to measure subsequent treatment for LTBI or development of active TB by record review.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • LTBI, tuberculosis, rifampin, isoniazid, prisoners
03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,417 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 364 is above the median of 150 across 952 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for this study will be San Francisco Jail inmates, age 18 or older (the jail does not house juveniles) having evidence of M. tuberculosis infection by positive tuberculin skin test (a documented reactive tuberculin skin test to 0.1 mL containing 5 Tuberculin Units) who meet current national criteria for therapy for tuberculosis infection and can provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ineligible for either therapy regimen for any of the following reasons:

    1. history of treatment-limiting reaction to isoniazid or rifamycins;
    2. pregnancy or breast feeding;
    3. active tuberculosis;
    4. an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 times the upper limit of normal;
    5. bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal;
    6. platelets \<150 K/mm3;
    7. taking protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs);
  • Unable to communicate in English or Spanish;
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent;
  • Not in the routine level of jail security for any reason (housed in "special security" areas);
  • Any condition that, in the best judgment of the investigator, would pose a risk to the subject during the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
364 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    B

    isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months

    Drug: Isoniazid

  • Active comparator
    A

    rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months

    Drug: Rifampin

Interventions

  • DrugIsoniazid

    Isoniazid 900 mg twice weekly

  • DrugRifampin

    Rifampin 600mg once per day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication

    Liver function tests were taken at regular intervals and clinical symptoms were reviewed at regular intervals in both study groups. On the basis of these tests and examinations, physicians determined whether the study drug needed to be stopped.

    Time frame: up to one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Completion of Therapy

    Time frame: course of treatment

  2. Cost Effectiveness

    Time frame: course of treatment

07

Results

Posted Dec 6, 2010
Limitations and caveats
Initial enrollment estimates were not met, from lower TB rates, increased deportation rates and fewer Jail personnel for LTBI testing. The complexity of treatment in the jail led to technical problems in the analytic plan.

Participant flow

Inmates in the San Francisco City and County Jail diagnosed with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) at jail entry were recruited,consented and enrolled between 11/30/2004 and 9/24/2007.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIsoniazidRifampin
Started184180
Completed4760
Not completed137120
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up137118
Withdrew: Adverse event02

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication

Liver function tests were taken at regular intervals and clinical symptoms were reviewed at regular intervals in both study groups. On the basis of these tests and examinations, physicians determined whether the study drug needed to be stopped.

Time frame:
up to one year
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication
participantsIsoniazidRifampin
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication63
Statistical analysis
  • Isoniazid vs Rifampin · Chi-squared · p = >.05 · Risk ratio (rr): .51 · 95% CI .13 to 2.01
SecondaryCompletion of Therapy
Time frame:
course of treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Completion of Therapy
ParticipantsIsoniazidRifampin
Completion of Therapy4760
SecondaryCost Effectiveness
Time frame:
course of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected during the course of treatment for each participant, until treatment was completed or subject was lost or withdrawn from the study. This was up to 1 year for all participants.. Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Isoniazid—11/184 (6%)46/184 (25%)
Rifampin—3/180 (1.7%)45/180 (25%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIsoniazidRifampin
elevated liver function testHepatobiliary disorders8/1841/180
suicidal thoughtsPsychiatric disorders1/1841/180
allergic reactionGeneral disorders0/1841/180
hospitalization for ankle surgerySurgical and medical procedures1/1840/180
hospitalization for appendectomySurgical and medical procedures1/1840/180
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIsoniazidRifampin
skin rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders13/18416/180
gastrointestinal symptomsGastrointestinal disorders12/18410/180
elevated liver function testsHepatobiliary disorders12/1848/180
injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications9/18411/180

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)IsoniazidRifampinTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years183180363
>=65 years101
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IsoniazidRifampinTotal
Mean30.34 ± 9.5931.51 ± 9.5730.9 ± 9.59
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IsoniazidRifampinTotal
Female111425
Male173166339
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)IsoniazidRifampinTotal
United States184180364
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143-0608, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • White MC, Tulsky JP, Lee JR, Chen L, Goldenson J, Spetz J, Kawamura LM. Isoniazid vs. rifampin for latent tuberculosis infection in jail inmates: toxicity and adherence. J Correct Health Care. 2012 Apr;18(2):131-42. doi: 10.1177/1078345811435973. Epub 2012 Mar 14. PubMed 22419641 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00128206
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2005
Start date
Nov 2004
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Sep 2009
Results posted
Dec 6, 2010
Last update
Jul 21, 2020

Study contacts

Mary C White, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion