CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00121940Updated Apr 20, 2012

Guided Care: Integrating High Tech and High Touch

An interventional study of Guided Care in Chronic Disease, sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-20.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
904
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of a Guided Care nurse on the quality of the health and well-being of the frail elderly. A specially trained registered nurse will work closely with 1-3 primary care physicians to provide the most complex older patients (and their unpaid caregivers) with health care that is comprehensive, coordinated, patient-centered, and proactive. The study will evaluate the effects of Guided Care on:

  • older persons' physical and mental health, health services utilization, quality of care, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with care;
  • older persons' unpaid caregivers' burden; and
  • primary care physicians' satisfaction with their care of chronically ill patients.
Read the detailed description

Health care for older Americans with chronic conditions is often fragmented and provider-centric. In response, a team of investigators at Johns Hopkins University has translated the scientific principles of seven successful innovations into one patient-centered system of care. Supported by evidence-based guidelines and state-of-the-art information technology, "Guided Care" is undergoing a 12-month pilot test in older primary care patients with complex needs. A specially trained Guided Care nurse (GCN), based in a primary care practice, collaborates with two primary care physicians to provide seven services for 40-60 high-risk patients: comprehensive assessment and care planning; "best practices" for chronic conditions; self-management; healthy lifestyles; coordinating care; educating and supporting unpaid caregivers; and accessing community resources.

The proposed multi-site study will measure the effects of Guided Care on the quality and outcomes of care for high-risk older persons, their unpaid caregivers, and their primary care physicians. The panels of 53 physicians in 7 practices will be screened to identify 1350 high-risk older patients. After about 850 have given informed consent and baseline interviews, clusters of 2-5 physicians at each practice site will be randomized to provide either Guided Care or usual care to their consenting patients. Each physician cluster in the Guided Care group will incorporate a GCN into its practice; the physician clusters in the control group will not.

Interviews and queries of administrative databases will provide evaluative data at baseline and at 12-, 24-, and 32-month follow-up intervals. The primary outcome variables are the participants' physical health and mental health (SF-36 Summary Scales) and health services utilization. Secondary outcome variables include: the quality of care; unpaid caregivers' burden; self-rated health; patient satisfaction; and primary care physicians' satisfaction. Intention-to-treat analyses will have 85% power (range of 70-97%) to detect clinically meaningful differences between the two groups.

The study is designed to facilitate the prompt dissemination of Guided Care, if the results of the trial are favorable. A stakeholders' advisory board, representing consumers, providers, delivery systems, insurers, regulators and policy-makers, will inform the operation and evaluation of the study - and it will facilitate the subsequent dissemination of its tools and technology throughout American health care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic Disease
  • Nurses
  • Caregivers
  • Support Groups
03

In context

Chronic Disease

990 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Disease; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 904 is above the median of 120 across 722 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Disease.

Browse Chronic Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 65
  • Insured by KPMAG, USFHP/TRICARE, or Medicare FFS
  • High likelihood of use of services in the coming year based on predictive modeling using current year's health care expenses

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moving out of area
  • Currently assigned to case manager/in case management program
  • Cognitive impairment and no legal representative
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
904 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Guided Care

    Behavioral: Guided Care

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralGuided Care

    Specially trained registered nurse (Guided Care Nurse) based in a primary care practice collaborates with two primary care physicians to provide seven services for 40-60 high-risk patients: comprehensive assessment and care planning; "best practices" for chronic conditions; self-management; healthy lifestyles; coordinating care; educating and supporting unpaid caregivers; and accessing community resources.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SF-36 Physical Health Summary Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 18, and 32 months

  2. SF-36 Mental Health Summary Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 18, and 32 months

  3. Health Services Utilization

    Multiple utilization measures (e.g. hospital admissions, SNF admissions, primary care visits, specialist visits) based on claims data

    Time frame: Baseline, 8, 20, and 32 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived Quality of Care

    Using Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 18, and 32 months

  2. Patient Satisfaction with Care

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 18, and 32 months

  3. Physician Satisfaction with Care

    Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months

  4. Caregiver Burden

    Using Modified Caregiver Strain Index

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, and 18 months

  5. Self-rated Health

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 18, and 32 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boult C, Reider L, Leff B, Frick KD, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, Frey K, Karm L, Wegener ST, Mroz T, Scharfstein DO. The effect of guided care teams on the use of health services: results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 14;171(5):460-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.540. PubMed 21403043 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00121940
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), National Institute on Aging (NIA), The John A. Hartford Foundation, The Jacob and Valeria Langeloth Foundation
Responsible party
Charles Boult (Professor, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2005
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Last update
Apr 20, 2012

Study contacts

Charles Boult, MD, MPH, MBA
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion