CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00108147Updated Mar 6, 2009

Functional Circuit Training in Older Adults With Congestive Heart Failure

An interventional study of Circuit Training and Cardiac Rehabilitation in Heart Failure, Congestive, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-03-06.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to determine the effect of a functional circuit training program as compared to standard cardiac rehabilitation or control exercise in improving physical function and activity.

Read the detailed description

In older (65 years of age or older) patients with congestive heart failure, we propose to:

  1. Assess: a) Peak aerobic capacity (peak VO2) during a monitored, standardized treadmill test; b) Oxygen uptake kinetics and heart rate during a standardized submaximal treadmill test; c) Performance on a set of functional mobility tasks; d) Self-report of physical disability and difficulty in performing daily tasks, and physical activity.
  2. Conduct a 12-week randomized controlled trial, comparing changes in these assessed measures in patients randomized to three different groups: 1) standard cardiac rehabilitation using bicycle exercise; 2) group functional circuit training focusing on exercises that involve functional mobility tasks and a home-activities exercise component; 3) a chair-based, flexibility and "toning " (low level resistance) group control exercise.
  3. Reassess all groups after an additional 12 weeks in the measures identified above to identify how well the three groups maintain their function.
  4. Examine the mechanisms underlying change in functional mobility performance and self-reported function as a result of the interventions

Primary hypothesis 1: Compared to chair-based exercise controls at the end of week 12, both the cardiac rehabilitation and functional circuit training groups will show improvements in measures of peak aerobic capacity, submaximal oxygen uptake kinetics, functional mobility performance, and self-reported function.

Primary hypothesis 2: Compared to the other two groups that are given exercise instructions only, the functional circuit training group, who continue their home activities exercise program, show less decline by week 24 in measures of peak aerobic capacity, submaximal oxygen uptake kinetics, functional mobility performance, and self-reported function.

Secondary hypothesis: Measures of submaximal oxygen uptake kinetics are better predictors of changes in functional mobility performance and self-reported function than peak aerobic capacity, muscle strength, joint range of motion, balance, and behavioral factors (such as depression).

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure, Congestive

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Exercise
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Congestive Heart Failure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Circuit Training

    Procedure: Circuit Training

  • Active comparator
    2

    Cardiac Rehabilitation

    Procedure: Cardiac Rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    3

    Flexibility and toning

    Procedure: Flexibility and toning

Interventions

  • ProcedureCircuit Training
  • ProcedureCardiac Rehabilitation
  • ProcedureFlexibility and toning
06

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113, United States
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00108147
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
First posted
Apr 15, 2005
Start date
Oct 2003
Last update
Mar 6, 2009

Study contacts

Neil Alexander, MD
principal investigator · VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion