ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00099489Updated Mar 5, 2010

Safety and Efficacy of Avonex in Subjects With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Interferon Beta-1a in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, sponsored by Biogen. Completed at 20 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-03-05.

Sponsored by Biogen · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 55 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in United States — 20 open to participants now, 25 under way, 10 of them phase 3. Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating · United States.

Enrollment
22nd of 42
67 · median 74
Started
2004
with 1 other
Phase 2
16 of 55
2 open now
Registered
2nd of 55
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 55
Biogen

Among the 55 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in United States, this one is the 22nd largest by enrollment of the 42 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2004, is one of 16 in phase 2, and was the 2nd registered.

Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating

137 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; 51 are open to participants now.

Browse Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating studies →

Open to participants now

20 of the 55 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

15 more — sign in →

All 20 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 36 Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating studies recruiting now, 24 (67%) set no upper age limit and 9 (25%) stop at 75 or younger; 4 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 55 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether AVONEX (Interferon Beta-1a), when compared to placebo, reduces the total dose of IVIg that is administered after Visit 5 and through Visit 9 (Week 32, End of Study).

Read the detailed description

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired peripheral neuropathy of unknown origin. The etiology is not well understood but is presumed to be immunological. Evidence for this comes from observed similarities to Guillain-Barre syndrome and from the favorable response with immunomodulatory treatments.

CIDP is a peripheral nervous system demyelinating neuropathy that is sometimes a corollary disorder to the central nervous system demyelination of multiple sclerosis (MS. The precise mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis are uncertain, but a number of those mechanisms support a potential role for immunomodulatory treatments such as interferon beta (e.g., Biogen Idec Inc.'s AVONEX).

The rationale for the use of AVONEX in CIDP derives from observations on the pathogenesis of the condition and its similarities to MS, the mechanism of action of AVONEX, clinical trials that have been performed in CIDP that support a role for IFN-beta, and the unmet need that currently exists because of availability and safety issues with existing therapies.

This Phase 2b study is a dose-ranging study designed to provide scientific evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of AVONEX in CIDP. In addition, the study aims to demonstrate the responsiveness and clinical relevance of changes in the MRC sum score and ODSS in CIDP patients.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Keywords

  • Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
  • CIDP
  • IVIg
  • AVONEX
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written prior to any testing under this protocol
  • Must be between 18 and 75 years of age
  • Have a diagnosis of CIDP as determined by a board-certified or board-eligible neurologist, or equivalent, for at least 6 months, including fulfilling modified INCAT neurophysiological criteria for CIDP,CIDP motor deficit responsive to IVIg and alternative EP data that justifies subject inclusion, and/or supportive pathologic or laboratory data that supports the diagnosis of CIDP
  • Documentation in the medical record prior to screening that the CIDP had been associated with loss of muscle strength, such that the MRC sum score was less than or equal to 58.
  • Documentation in the medical record that the patient benefited fom IVIg treatment (patient had a 2-point change or equivalent in 60-point MRC sum score)
  • Tested for IgM monoclonal gammopathy and found to have tested negative for IgM monoclonal gammopathy or if positive for IgM monoclonal gammopathy, then are MAG antibody-negative and proven to be IVI g responsive per protocol.
  • Must have been clinically stable while on a constant regimen of IVIg (every 2-weeks, 3-weeks, 4-weeks or 5-weeks) in the 3 months prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria*:

  • Associated systemic disorder that might cause neuropathy.
  • History of, or abnormal laboratory results indicative of any significant major disease or known drug that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the administration if IFN-beta or participation in this study.
  • Subjects with diabetes mellitus will not be eligible, unless they satisfy both of the following requirements: a) their diabetes is well-controlled, with no retinopathy or nephropathy, having been identified during the ongoing care of their diabetes; and b) they have a normal sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude recorded in the sural nerve on at least one side of the body identified during electrophysiology (EP) testing documented in their medical record.
  • Abnormal screening or baseline blood tests that the investigator deems
  • History of a seizure disorder prior to baseline (Visit 1, Week 0).
  • History of suicidal ideation within 3 months prior to Baseline Visit (Week 0) or an episode of severe depression within 3 months prior to Baseline Visit (Week 0).
  • Pure motor syndrome fulfilling criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block.
  • Pure sensory CIDP, or any other variant of CIDP without motor involvement
  • Serious local infection or systemic infection within the 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Use of IFN-beta at any time, use of plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, or any other (with the exception of oral or non-systemic ) within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • History of intolerance to acetaminophen (paracetamol), ibuprofen, naproxen, and/or aspirin that would preclude use of at least one of these during the study.
  • For female subjects, unless or surgically sterile, unwillingness to practice effective , as defined by the Investigator, during the study.
  • Female subjects considering becoming pregnant while in the study
  • Female subjects who are currently pregnant or breast-feeding.

    • This list is not exhaustive and there may be additional exclusions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
67 participants

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint for the efficacy analyses is the total IVIg dose (g/Kg) administered after Visit 5 and through Visit 9 (Week 32, End of Study).

Secondary outcomes

  1. The time to disease progression.

  2. Percentage reduction in IVIg dose (g/Kg).

  3. The number of days between Visit 5 and either disease progression or Visit 9

  4. (Week 32, End of Study).

  5. The proportion of subjects with disease progression at Visit 9 (Week 32, End of Study).

  6. The change in MRC sum score from baseline to the time of IVIg withdrawal.

  7. Change from baseline to Visit 5 and to Visit 9 (Week 32, End of Study) in a composite score of maximal conduction velocity.

07

Study locations

20 sites
  • Phoenix Neurological Associates, Ltd.
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Neuromuscular Research Center
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85258, United States
  • University of Florida, Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • University of Kansas
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Louisiana State University
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Harvard University/MGH
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Tufts University/ St. Elizabeths
    Boston, Massachusetts 02135, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • Raleigh Neurology Associates
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern
    Dallas, Texas 75390-8897, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
  • Liverpool Hospital
    Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • Institute of Clinical Neurosciences
    Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
  • St. Vincent's Hospital
    Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • London Health Sciences Center
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Montreal Neurological Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
  • Guy's Hospital/Dept. of Neuroimmunology
    London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2004, a primary completion of Feb 2006 and a completion of Feb 2006. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2004
First posted
Dec 16, 2004
Start
Feb 2004
Primary completionActual
Feb 2006
CompletionActual
Feb 2006
Last update
Mar 5, 2010
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00099489
Lead sponsor
Biogen
First posted
Dec 16, 2004
Start date
Feb 2004
Primary completion
Feb 2006
Completion
Feb 2006
Last update
Mar 5, 2010

Study contacts

Allan Ropper, MD
principal investigator · Tufts University School of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Kate Dawson, MD
study director · Biogen
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Interferon beta-1a

Start the discussion