ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00097786NavigatorUpdated Nov 8, 2023Results posted

Long-term Study of Nateglinide+Valsartan to Prevent or Delay Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Complications

A Phase 3 interventional study of Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg and Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 38 sites in 38 countries. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-08.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9,306
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a test of the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, one for diabetes and one for hypertension, in keeping patients with high lab values of glucose from progressing to frank diabetes and developing cardiovascular complications. People in this study cannot have frank diabetes but are considered "borderline" based on blood tests. People in the study take none, one or both of the drugs and do not know which one(s) they are taking.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • Prevention
  • Diabetes type 2
  • valsartan
  • nateglinide
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9,306 is above the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,718 studies on the registry; 221 are open to participants now.

Of its 585 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 438 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults
  • Impaired glucose tolerance
  • Age dependent risk factors

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Frank diabetes

For detailed information, call contact person.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
9,306 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

    For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took the combination of nateglinide 30 mg (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and valsartan 80 mg (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to nateglinide 60 mg ac and valsartan 160 mg od.

    Drug: Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

  • Experimental
    Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

    For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took valsartan 80 mg capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to 160 mg valsartan od. Patients also received nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals).

    Drug: Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

  • Experimental
    Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

    For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took nateglinide 30 mg tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals). After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 60 mg nateglinide ac. Patients also received valsartan placebo capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning).

    Drug: Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Patients took 3 nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and 1 valsartan placebo capsule (once daily \[od\] in the morning).

    Drug: Valsartan placebo + nateglinide placebo

Interventions

  • DrugValsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

    Drug page: Valsartan

    The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

  • DrugValsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

    The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

  • DrugNateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

    The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

  • DrugValsartan placebo + nateglinide placebo

    The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

    Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

    Time frame: Mean patient duration of 4.2 years

  2. Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

    The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

    Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.6 years

  3. Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

    The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

    Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.8 years

  4. Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

    Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

    Time frame: Mean patient duration of 4.2 years

  5. Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

    The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

    Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.6 years

  6. Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

    The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

    Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.8 years

07

Results

Posted May 24, 2011

Participant flow

Initially enrolled 9518, 212 excluded.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneValsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg acValsartan 160 mg od + Placebo NateglinideNateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo ValsartanPlacebo
Started2316231523292346
Complete fu for progression to diabetes1709171217341762
Complete follow-up for extended cv eps1969198519872015
Complete follow-up for core cv eps1948196319661988
Completed2020202320162036
Not completed296292313310
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up for all-cause death296292313310

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

Time frame:
Mean patient duration of 4.2 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
Percentage of patientsValsartanNon-valsartan
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan33.136.8
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

Time frame:
Mean patient duration of 5.6 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
Percentage of patientsValsartanNon-valsartan
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan14.514.8
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Time frame:
Mean patient duration of 5.8 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
Percentage of patientsValsartanNon-valsartan
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan8.18.1
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

Time frame:
Mean patient duration of 4.2 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
Percentage of patientsNateglinideNon-nateglinide
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide36.033.9
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

Time frame:
Mean patient duration of 5.6 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
Percentage of patientsNateglinideNon-nateglinide
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide14.215.2
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Time frame:
Mean patient duration of 5.8 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
Percentage of patientsNateglinideNon-nateglinide
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide7.98.3

Adverse events

Collected over The maximum follow-up time was 7.7 years with the mean follow-up time of approximately 6 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Valsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg ac—1,031/2,297 (44.9%)1,970/2,297 (85.8%)
Valsartan 160 mg od + Placebo Nateglinide—1,040/2,283 (45.6%)1,932/2,283 (84.6%)
Nateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo Valsartan—1,035/2,305 (44.9%)1,951/2,305 (84.6%)
Placebo—1,049/2,316 (45.3%)1,934/2,316 (83.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 1,671
Most frequent serious events
EventValsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg acValsartan 160 mg od + Placebo NateglinideNateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo ValsartanPlacebo
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders92/229799/228371/230574/2316
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders77/229792/228392/230593/2316
Angina unstableCardiac disorders46/229763/228361/230560/2316
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders60/229746/228357/230563/2316
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications46/229747/228359/230536/2316
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders43/229737/228350/230542/2316
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders26/229728/228348/230530/2316
PneumoniaInfections and infestations47/229733/228341/230543/2316
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders46/229741/228346/230546/2316
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders45/229733/228333/230546/2316
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent other events
EventValsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg acValsartan 160 mg od + Placebo NateglinideNateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo ValsartanPlacebo
HypotensionVascular disorders732/2297717/2283582/2305542/2316
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders455/2297271/2283454/2305251/2316
HypertensionVascular disorders293/2297302/2283392/2305444/2316
DizzinessNervous system disorders440/2297379/2283397/2305351/2316
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations396/2297410/2283408/2305385/2316
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders398/2297358/2283339/2305326/2316
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders369/2297377/2283377/2305367/2316
InfluenzaInfections and infestations301/2297309/2283299/2305315/2316
HeadacheNervous system disorders242/2297289/2283306/2305311/2316
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders305/2297299/2283278/2305277/2316

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Valsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg acValsartan 160 mg od + Placebo NateglinideNateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo ValsartanPlaceboTotal
Mean63.7 ± 6.7563.7 ± 6.9163.8 ± 6.8263.9 ± 6.8863.8 ± 6.84
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Valsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg acValsartan 160 mg od + Placebo NateglinideNateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo ValsartanPlaceboTotal
Female11741140119412034711
Male11421175113511434595
08

Study locations

38 sites
  • Multiple Locations, New Jersey, United States
  • Investigative Site, Argentina
  • Investigative Site, Australia
  • Multiple Locations, Austria
  • Investigative Site, Belgium
  • Investigative Site, Brazil
  • Investigative Site, Canada
  • Investigative Site, Chile
  • Investigative Site, China
  • Investigative Site, Colombia
  • Investigative Site, Czechia
  • Investigative Site, Denmark
  • Investigative Site, Ecuador
  • Investigative Site, Finland
  • Investigative Site, France
  • Investigative Site, Germany
  • Investigative Site, Greece
  • Investigative Site, Guatemala
  • Investigative Site, Hong Kong
  • Investigative Site, Hungary
  • Investigative Site, Italy
  • Investigative Site, Malaysia
  • Investigative Site, Mexico
  • Investigative Site, Netherlands
  • Investigative Site, Norway
  • Investigative Site, Peru
  • Investigative Site, Poland
  • Investigative Site, Russian Federation
  • Investigative Site, Singapore
  • Investigative Site, Slovakia
  • Investigative Site, South Africa
  • Investigative Site, Spain
  • Investigative Site, Sweden
  • Investigative Site, Switzerland
  • Investigative Site, Taiwan
  • Investigative Site, Turkey
  • Investigative Site, United Kingdom
  • Investigative Site, Uruguay
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Harumi Higuchi Dos Santos M, Sharma A, Sun JL, Pieper K, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Lopes RD. International Variation in Outcomes Among People with Cardiovascular Disease or Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Insights from the NAVIGATOR Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 13;6(1):e003892. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003892. PubMed 28087508 ↗
  • Preiss D, Thomas LE, Wojdyla DM, Haffner SM, Gill JM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Kraus WE; NAVIGATOR Investigators. Prospective relationships between body weight and physical activity: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 14;5(8):e007901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007901. PubMed 26275900 ↗
  • Katz M, Califf RM, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Thomas L, Lopes RD. Venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular risk: results from the NAVIGATOR trial. Am J Med. 2015 Mar;128(3):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Nov 20. PubMed 25447626 ↗
  • Preiss D, Haffner SM, Thomas LE, Sun JL, Sattar N, Yates T, J Davies M, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Califf RM, Kraus WE. Change in levels of physical activity after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Dec;16(12):1265-8. doi: 10.1111/dom.12320. Epub 2014 Jun 19. PubMed 24861892 ↗
  • Huffman KM, Sun JL, Thomas L, Bales CW, Califf RM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Haffner SM, Kraus WE. Impact of baseline physical activity and diet behavior on metabolic syndrome in a pharmaceutical trial: results from NAVIGATOR. Metabolism. 2014 Apr;63(4):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 15. PubMed 24559843 ↗
  • Yates T, Haffner SM, Schulte PJ, Thomas L, Huffman KM, Bales CW, Califf RM, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Davies MJ, Kraus WE. Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial): a cohort analysis. Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1059-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62061-9. Epub 2013 Dec 20. PubMed 24361242 ↗
  • Shen L, Shah BR, Reyes EM, Thomas L, Wojdyla D, Diem P, Leiter LA, Charbonnel B, Mareev V, Horton ES, Haffner SM, Soska V, Holman R, Bethel MA, Schaper F, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Krum H. Role of diuretics, beta blockers, and statins in increasing the risk of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: reanalysis of data from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ. 2013 Dec 9;347:f6745. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6745. Erratum In: BMJ. 2014;348:f1339. PubMed 24322398 ↗
  • NAVIGATOR Study Group; McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1748. PubMed 20228403 ↗
  • NAVIGATOR Study Group; Holman RR, Haffner SM, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1463-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001122. Epub 2010 Mar 14. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1748. PubMed 20228402 ↗
  • Krum H, McMurray JJ, Horton E, Gerlock T, Holzhauer B, Zuurman L, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holman RR, Califf RM. Baseline characteristics of the Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial population: comparison with other diabetes prevention trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Apr;28(2):124-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00146.x. Epub 2010 Feb 23. PubMed 20184589 ↗
  • Bethel MA, Deedwania P, Levitt NS, Schmitz O, Huntsman-Labed A, Califf RM, Haffner SM, Diem P; NAVIGATOR Study Group. Metabolic syndrome and alanine aminotransferase: a global perspective from the NAVIGATOR screening population. Diabet Med. 2009 Dec;26(12):1204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02864.x. PubMed 20002471 ↗
  • Bethel MA, Holman R, Haffner SM, Califf RM, Huntsman-Labed A, Hua TA, McMurray J. Determining the most appropriate components for a composite clinical trial outcome. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jul 31. PubMed 18926145 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00097786
First posted
Dec 1, 2004
Start date
Jan 2002
Primary completion
Oct 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Results posted
May 24, 2011
Last update
Nov 8, 2023

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Valsartan

Start the discussion