CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00094692Updated Mar 24, 2010

An Evaluation of Treatment of Amblyopia in Children 7 To <18 Years Old

A Phase 3 interventional study of Eye patch and spectacles in Amblyopia, sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-03-24.

Sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
507
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goals of this study are:

  • To determine the response rate of treatment of amblyopia in 7 to \<18 year olds.
  • To determine the frequency of recurrence of amblyopia in 7 to \<18 year olds after discontinuation of amblyopia treatment.
Read the detailed description

Most eye care practitioners believe that there is an age beyond which attempting to treat amblyopia is futile. It is generally held that the response to treatment is best when it is instituted at an early age and is poor when attempted after eight years of age. There has not been a prospective clinical trial conducted with appropriate rigor that has evaluated the effect of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 years or older. Although available data on the efficacy of amblyopia treatment of older children are limited, there is reason to believe from clinical observations and published case series that treatment could have benefit. In a pilot study of patients 10 to \<18 years old with amblyopia, we found that 37 percent of 52 patients showed improvement in the amblyopic eye acuity of 2 or more lines after treatment with part-time patching. However, without a concurrent randomized control group, the results are not conclusive. Although the literature and our pilot study provide support that amblyopia can be improved with treatment, neither the response rate to treatment nor the recidivism rate after cessation of treatment can be well defined. Despite the evidence that amblyopia therapy can be effective in older children, many clinicians do not attempt treatment under the assumption that it will be unsuccessful. Therefore, a clinical trial is needed to provide the requisite data to establish clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of amblyopia in older children. In addition to its importance for patient management, the trial's results will meet the demand for cost effectiveness by health maintenance organizations, large employers, and insurers.

The study is a randomized trial comparing patients treated with spectacles only (Control Group) to patients undergoing active treatment (patching, near activities while patching, and atropine for children under the age of 13) in addition to spectacles (Active Treatment Group). It will enroll a minimum of 90 patients in each of the age groups of 7 to \<9, 9 to \<11, 11 to \<13, and 13 to \<18 years old. Patients have follow up visits every 6 weeks (up to a maximum of 24 weeks) until they are classified as either responders or nonresponders based on amblyopic eye visual acuity. At the end of the randomized trial:

  • Patients who did not respond to treatment end follow up.
  • Patients who responded to treatment continue in their respective treatment groups until visual acuity stops improving.

Once there is no further improvement in visual acuity:

  • Patients in the Control Group end follow up
  • Patients in the Active Treatment Group discontinue active treatment and have follow up visits at 13 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks timed from treatment discontinuation.
02

Conditions studied

  • Amblyopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Amblyopia
  • Patching
  • Spectacles
03

In context

Amblyopia

183 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 507 is above the median of 60 across 133 interventional studies indexed under Amblyopia.

Browse Amblyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Jaeb Center for Health Research is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be aged 7 to \<18 years and have amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both.
  • Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye must be 20/40 to 20/400 inclusive and visual acuity in the sound eye must be 20/25 or better.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must not have received amblyopia treatment (other than spectacles) in the past month or more than one month of amblyopia treatment in the last 6 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
507 participants

Interventions

  • DeviceEye patch
  • Devicespectacles
  • Drugatropine
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual acuity improvement

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Wilmer Eye Institute
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287-9028, United States
  • Pennsylvania College of Optometry
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A prospective, pilot study of treatment of amblyopia in children 10 to <18 years old. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;137(3):581-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.043. PubMed 15013894 ↗
  • Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW, Edwards AR, Birch E, Cotter SA, Crouch ER Jr, Cruz OA, Davitt BV, Donahue S, Holmes JM, Lyon DW, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Suh DW, Tamkins SM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):437-47. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.4.437. PubMed 15824215 ↗
  • Hertle RW, Scheiman MM, Beck RW, Chandler DL, Bacal DA, Birch E, Chu RH, Holmes JM, Klimek DL, Lee KA, Repka MX, Weakley DR Jr; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Stability of visual acuity improvement following discontinuation of amblyopia treatment in children aged 7 to 12 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 May;125(5):655-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.5.655. PubMed 17502505 ↗
  • Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Melia M, Birch EE, Holmes JM, Hopkins KB, Kraker RT, Kulp MT, Pang Y, Repka MX, Tamkins SM, Weise KK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2011 Oct;15(5):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.06.007. PubMed 22108357 ↗
  • Repka M, Simons K, Kraker R; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Laterality of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;150(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 May 8. PubMed 20451898 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00094692
Lead sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI)
First posted
Oct 22, 2004
Start date
Oct 2002
Completion
Dec 2005
Last update
Mar 24, 2010

Study contacts

Richard W. Hertle, M.D.
study chair · University of Pittsburgh
Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D.
study chair · Pennsylvania College of Optometry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion