CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00087776Updated Jul 23, 2025

Study of Taxoprexin Injection vs. Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Taxoprexin and Dacarbazine in Malignant Melanoma, sponsored by American Regent, Inc.. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-23.

Sponsored by American Regent, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Interim analysis determined that the futility boundary had been crossed and there was no reasonable prospect that statistical significance would be achieved if patient accrual continued

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Oct 2007, 18 years 11 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2002, registered Jul 2004).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
393
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this trial is to compare the survival of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with Taxoprexin Injection to those treated with Dacarbazine. In addition, the response rate to each drug, response duration, time to progression and time to treatment failure will be measured. Toxicity will be evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, multi-center, open-label Phase III study in patients with histologically confirmed metastatic malignant melanoma. Patients received either Taxoprexin® at a starting dose of 900 mg/m2 intravenously by 2-hour infusion on Day 1 every 3 weeks or dacarbazine at a starting dose of 1000 mg/m2 intravenously over at least 30 minutes once every 3 weeks. Treatment continued until progression of disease, intolerable toxicity, refusal of continued treatment by the patient, or, in the investigator's opinion, treatment discontinued. Disease status was assessed every 6 to 8 weeks using standard imaging techniques. All images were forwarded to the sponsor and archived. Following the end of protocol treatment, further treatment was at the investigator's discretion but no cross-over was planned. All patients were followed until death

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Melanoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Melanoma

3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 519 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 393 is above the median of 38 across 2,350 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

American Regent, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must have malignant melanoma, and documented metastatic disease.
  • Patients must have at least one unidimensionally measurable lesion.
  • Patients must not have received prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Prior treatment with immunotherapy or vaccine therapy is allowed provided there is documentation of disease progression.
  • At least 6 weeks (42 days) since any prior immunotherapy, cytokine, biologic, vaccine or other therapy unless patients have progressed during immunotherapy.
  • At least 4 weeks (28 days) since any prior radiotherapy.
  • Lesions being used to assess disease status may not have been radiated.
  • Patients must have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 - 2.
  • Patients must be >= 18 years of age.
  • Patients must have adequate renal and liver function
  • Patients must have adequate bone marrow function.
  • Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  • Patients must sign an informed consent form indicating that they are aware of the investigational nature of this study and in keeping with the policies of the institution.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received prior therapy with any taxane or dacarbazine.
  • Patients whose primary site is the eye.
  • Patients who have a past or current history of neoplasm other than the entry diagnosis, except for curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or other cancers cured by surgery alone with a disease-free survival longer than 5 years.
  • Patients with uncontrolled brain metastasis.
  • Patients who are pregnant or nursing and patients who are not practicing an acceptable method of birth control. Patients may not breastfeed while on this study.
  • Patients with current active infections requiring anti-infectious treatment (e.g., antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals).
  • Patients with current peripheral neuropathy of any etiology that is greater than grade 1.
  • Patients with unstable or serious concurrent medical conditions are excluded.
  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to Cremophor.
  • Patients must not have had recent major surgery within the past 14 days or large field radiation therapy, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy in the last 28 days, or biologic therapy in the last 42 days.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
393 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Taxoprexin

    Taxoprexin® 900 mg/m² intravenously every 3 weeks

    Drug: Taxoprexin

  • Active comparator
    Dacarbazine

    Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m² intravenously every 3 weeks.

    Drug: Dacarbazine

Interventions

  • DrugTaxoprexin

    Administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hour infusion on Day 1 followed by a 20-day observation period for a total of 21 days (three weeks) per course

    Also known as: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel

  • DrugDacarbazine

    Administered by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Day 1 followed by a 20-day observation period for a total of 21 days (three weeks) per course

    Also known as: Imidazole carboxamide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Participant Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to participant death or the termination of the study, whichever occurs first. Participants were contacted monthly for survival information.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Complete Response or Partial Response

    Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target lesions determined by 2 consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Partial response was defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD determined by 2 consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart.

    Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 38 months

  2. Duration of Response

    Duration of overall response was a measurement from the time measure criteria was met for confirmed complete response or partial response (whichever was first recorded) until the first date that recurrent of progressive disease was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurement recorded since treatment started).

    Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 36 months

  3. Time to Progression (TPP)

    Progression free survival time was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the start of documented progression, based on the blinded radiological review response assessment. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions

    Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks until progression or death, up to 36 months

  4. Time to Failure (TTF)

    Time to Failure (TTF) was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the discontinuation of protocol treatment for any reason.

    Time frame: Baseline to stopping treatment, up to 36 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Norristown, Pennsylvania 19403, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00087776
Lead sponsor
American Regent, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 16, 2004
Start date
Dec 6, 2002
Primary completion
Oct 27, 2007
Completion
Oct 27, 2007
Last update
Jul 23, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion