ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00085202Updated Feb 8, 2024Results posted

Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Medulloblastoma, Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor, or Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor

A Phase 3 interventional study of filgrastim and cisplatin in Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Completed at 9 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-08.

Sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
416
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
3 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. Autologous stem cell transplant may be able to replace blood-forming cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy. It is not yet known which radiation therapy regimen combined with chemotherapy and donor stem cell transplant is more effective in treating medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor.

This phase III trial is studying two different regimens of radiation therapy when given together with chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant to see how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  • To assess the relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival probability for patients with medulloblastoma.
  • To estimate the frequency of mutations associated with SHH and WNT tumors (as defined by gene expression profiling) via targeted sequencing performed in an independent cohort of WNT and SHH tumors (also defined by gene expression profiling).
Read the detailed description

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  • To compare the effects of a computer-based training system specifically targeting language, reading, and learning skills (Fast ForWord, Scientific Learning Corporation) with the current standard of care on reading decoding skills as measured by individual academic testing.
  • To monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation.
  • To correlate radiation dosimetry of target and normal tissues with rate and patterns of failure and longitudinal measures of audiometric, endocrine and cognitive effects.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

  • To estimate the change in neuropsychological performance from the neuropsychology assessment battery (intellect, academic achievement and cognitive ability) and examine the relationship of these changes to risk group, age at diagnosis, and parent measures.
  • To evaluate the differences between neurotoxicity in the average-risk patient group with that in the high-risk group through qMRI, and fMRI.
  • To develop or refine novel models relating impact of medulloblastoma therapy on neurocognitive performance to quantitative and functional neuroimaging measures.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease risk (high-risk disease vs average-risk disease).

Patients in both strata undergo peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow harvest.

  • Stratum 1 (high-risk group):

    • Radiotherapy: Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks.
    • High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT): Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy comprising vincristine IV followed by cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day -4 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -3 and -2. Patients undergo autologous SCT on day 0. Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 1 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients receive vincristine IV on day 6. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
  • Stratum 2 (average-risk group):

    • Radiotherapy: Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose.
    • High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT: Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Some patients undergo a neuropsychology assessment at baseline, before chemotherapy, and then annually for 5 years.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 3 months until month 30 (2.5 years) after diagnosis and then every 6 months until month 72 (6 years) after diagnosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors

Keywords

  • untreated childhood medulloblastoma
  • untreated childhood supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor
  • childhood atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor
  • untreated childhood pineoblastoma
03

In context

Central Nervous System Neoplasms

699 studies on the registry are indexed under Central Nervous System Neoplasms; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 416 is above the median of 35 across 487 interventional studies indexed under Central Nervous System Neoplasms.

Browse Central Nervous System Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 440 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Of its 61 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 37 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • confirmed diagnosis of 1 of the following:

    • Medulloblastoma
    • Supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)
    • PNET variants (ependymoblastoma, pineoblastoma, CNS neuroblastoma)
    • Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT)
  • Definitive surgery for CNS tumor within the past 31 days
  • Meets one of the following risk criteria:

    • Average-risk disease

      • Localized disease with no overt evidence of invasion beyond the posterior fossa (or supratentorial compartment for PNET or ATRT) by intraoperative observations of the neurosurgeon AND postoperative CT scan or MRI
      • T4 disease eligible if all of the following are true:

        • Gross total resection determined by intraoperative observations of the neurosurgeon AND postoperative CT scan or MRI
        • Residual tumor or imaging abnormality whose size is \< 1.5 cm\^2
        • No evidence of CNS or extraneural by MRI of the spine (with and without contrast agent) or CT-based myelogram AND by cytologic examination of the lumbar cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) 14-28 days after surgery
      • Brain stem invasion allowed in the absence of residual tumor (tumor \< 1.5 cm\^2 by imaging)
    • High-risk disease meeting one of the following criteria:

      • Metastatic disease within the neuraxis (i.e., evidence of subarachnoid dissemination by imaging and/or cytologic examination of CSF)
      • Presence of residual disease > 1.5 cm\^2 at the primary site after surgery

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 3 to 21 at diagnosis

Performance status

  • Lansky 30-100% (\< 10 years old)
  • 30-100% (≥ 10 years old) (except for posterior fossa syndrome)

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • > 8 g/dL
  • WBC > 2,000/mm\^3
  • > 500/mm\^3
  • count > 50,000/mm\^3

Hepatic

  • \< 5 times normal
  • \< 3.0 mg/dL

Renal

  • Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL OR
  • > 70 mL/min

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

  • Prior therapy allowed

Radiotherapy

  • No prior radiotherapy

Surgery

  • See Disease Characteristics
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
416 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

    Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

    Biological: filgrastim · Drug: cisplatin · Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: vincristine · Procedure: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Radiation: radiation therapy

  • Experimental
    Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

    Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1. Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

    Biological: filgrastim · Drug: cisplatin · Drug: cyclophosphamide · Drug: vincristine · Procedure: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Radiation: radiation therapy

Interventions

  • Biologicalfilgrastim

    Given subcutaneously

    Also known as: Neupogen(R), G-CSF

  • Given IV

    Also known as: Platinol-AQ(R)

  • Given IV

    Also known as: Cytoxan(R)

  • Given IV

    Also known as: Oncovin(R)

  • Procedureautologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

    Also known as: autologous HSCT

  • Radiationradiation therapy

    Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks.

    Also known as: RT, Craniospinal radiotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors

    The relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival was assessed in 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with ERBB2 protein assessments. If the ERBB2 value was greater than zero, the ERBB2 was defined as positive for the participant. If the ERBB2 value was zero, the ERBB2 was defined as negative. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

    Time frame: 2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.

    122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma were grouped by ERBB2 positive/negative assessment and risk group into 4 groups. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

    Time frame: 2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants

  3. Frequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT Tumors

    The frequency of mutations for the main genes associated with SHH and WNT tumors identified via targeted sequencing based on formalin fixed paraffin embedded material is provided.

    Time frame: within 3.5 years following completion of accrual

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups

    SOC is standard-of-Care control group. Patients randomly assigned to the control group received the current standard of care. RI is Reading Intervention Group. Patients randomly assigned to Reading Intervention Group which is with The Fast ForWord program. Assessment of reading decoding was completed using the Woodcock Johnson, Third Edition (WJIII) Tests of Achievement (Woodcock, McGraw, \& Mather, 2001), with particular attention given to the reading and reading-related abilities. Two subtests were completed: (1) Letter-Word Identification, and (2) Word Attack, a test requiring the patient to read phonologically regular nonwords. The combination of these two subtests provided a standardized composite score of overall reading decoding ability with a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Scores of 90-110 are considered to be in the average range, while those 80-89 are considered low-average (refer: Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39(4) pp. 450-458, 2014).

    Time frame: 5 years postdiagnosis

  2. Number of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa

    To monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation.

    Time frame: Annually for 6 years post irradiation

  3. Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

    Assessment of associative memory at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

    Time frame: At enrollment

  4. Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

    Assessment of associative memory at 5 years after enrollment. Assessment of associative memory score at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

    Time frame: At 5 years after enrollment

  5. Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

    Assessment of Processing Speed at enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

    Time frame: At enrollment

  6. Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

    Assessment of Processing Speed at 5 years after enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

    Time frame: At 5 years after enrollment

  7. Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

    Assessment of Perceptual Speed at enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

    Time frame: At enrollment

  8. Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

    Assessment of Perceptual Speed at 5 years after enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

    Time frame: At 5 years after enrollment

07

Results

Posted Feb 27, 2014
Limitations and caveats
The study participants for Secondary Outcome Measure #4 were randomized to standard-of-care group vs. reading intervention after medical treatment. The participants were a subset of patients who contributed to the primary aim and who signed a separate consent form distinct from the main medical treatment consent. They were then randomly assigned to either the standard-of-care group (SOC) or to the reading intervention (RI) group.

Participant flow

416 participants were enrolled between 9/9/2003 and 3/7/2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAverage-Risk GroupHigh-Risk Group
Started269144
Completed251120
Not completed1824
Withdrew: Still on therapy20
Withdrew: Bone involvement confirmed by bone scan01
Withdrew: Excessive toxicity65
Withdrew: Non-specified35
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21
Withdrew: Physician decision41
Withdrew: Progressive disease111

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors

The relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival was assessed in 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with ERBB2 protein assessments. If the ERBB2 value was greater than zero, the ERBB2 was defined as positive for the participant. If the ERBB2 value was zero, the ERBB2 was defined as negative. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

Time frame:
2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants
Reported as:
Number · probability of PFS at 2 years
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors
probability of PFS at 2 yearsOverall StudyAverage-Risk GroupHigh-Risk Group
Positive ERBB279.2 (70.4 to 88.0)83.3 (73.5 to 93.1)69.6 (50.8 to 88.4)
Negative ERBB286.7 (76.9 to 96.5)93.5 (85.1 to 100)71.4 (48.9 to 93.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Overall Study · Log Rank · p = 0.8001
  • Average-Risk Group · Log Rank · p = 0.5195
  • High-Risk Group · Log Rank · p = 0.7696
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.

122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma were grouped by ERBB2 positive/negative assessment and risk group into 4 groups. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

Time frame:
2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants
Reported as:
Number · probability of PFS at 2 years
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.
probability of PFS at 2 yearsERBB2 Positive & Average RiskERBB2 Positive & High RiskERBB2 Negative & Average RiskERBB2 Negative & High Risk
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.83.3 (73.5 to 93.1)69.6 (50.8 to 88.4)93.5 (85.1 to 100)71.4 (48.9 to 93.9)
Statistical analysis
  • ERBB2 Positive & Average Risk vs ERBB2 Positive & High Risk vs ERBB2 Negative & Average Risk vs ERBB2 Negative & High Risk · Log Rank · p = 0.0206
PrimaryFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT Tumors

The frequency of mutations for the main genes associated with SHH and WNT tumors identified via targeted sequencing based on formalin fixed paraffin embedded material is provided.

Time frame:
within 3.5 years following completion of accrual
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Frequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT Tumors
ParticipantsSHH Pathway - In/Del SomaticWNT Pathway - In/Del SomaticSHH Pathway - In/Del GermlineWNT Pathway - In/Del GermlineSHH Pathway - SNV SomaticWNT Pathway - SNV SomaticSHH Pathway - SNV GermlineWNT Pathway - SNV Germline
PTCH170004000
DDX3X00003700
TP5300005300
KMT2D22000000
SUFU20000000
CREBBP12000100
GLI200000100
TCF400001000
PTEN00003000
KMT2C01002100
FBXW700001400
GSE130000000
CTNNB1000011800
SMARCA400000400
PIK3CA00002100
APC00000001
EPHA701000000
ARID1A01001000
ARID200000100
ATM00001000
BRCA200100000
SecondaryReading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups

SOC is standard-of-Care control group. Patients randomly assigned to the control group received the current standard of care. RI is Reading Intervention Group. Patients randomly assigned to Reading Intervention Group which is with The Fast ForWord program. Assessment of reading decoding was completed using the Woodcock Johnson, Third Edition (WJIII) Tests of Achievement (Woodcock, McGraw, \& Mather, 2001), with particular attention given to the reading and reading-related abilities. Two subtests were completed: (1) Letter-Word Identification, and (2) Word Attack, a test requiring the patient to read phonologically regular nonwords. The combination of these two subtests provided a standardized composite score of overall reading decoding ability with a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Scores of 90-110 are considered to be in the average range, while those 80-89 are considered low-average (refer: Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39(4) pp. 450-458, 2014).

Time frame:
5 years postdiagnosis
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups
score on a scaleInterventionStandard of Care
Baseline104.1 ± 1.902102.4 ± 2.604
Change over time-1.51 ± 0.4849-1.17 ± 0.4883
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6231
  • Intervention vs Standard of Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5720
SecondaryNumber of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa

To monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation.

Time frame:
Annually for 6 years post irradiation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa
ParticipantsAverage-Risk Group
Number of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa6
SecondaryAssociative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

Assessment of associative memory at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame:
At enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment
score on a scaleAverage Risk GroupHigh Risk Group
Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment93.61 ± 22.2598.04 ± 18.56
SecondaryAssociative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

Assessment of associative memory at 5 years after enrollment. Assessment of associative memory score at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame:
At 5 years after enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment
score on a scaleAverage Risk GroupHigh Risk Group
Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment98.73 ± 16.9493.58 ± 13.7
SecondaryProcessing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

Assessment of Processing Speed at enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame:
At enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment
score on a scaleAverage Risk GroupHigh Risk Group
Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment83.98 ± 18.5387.29 ± 19.73
SecondaryProcessing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

Assessment of Processing Speed at 5 years after enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame:
At 5 years after enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment
score on a scaleAverage Risk GroupHigh Risk Group
Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment84.21 ± 24.3675.71 ± 25.71
SecondaryPerceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

Assessment of Perceptual Speed at enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame:
At enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment
score on a scaleAverage Risk GroupHigh Risk Group
Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment82.06 ± 19.9990.04 ± 18.23
SecondaryPerceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

Assessment of Perceptual Speed at 5 years after enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame:
At 5 years after enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment
score on a scaleAverage Risk GroupHigh Risk Group
Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment78.68 ± 21.5872.29 ± 27.32

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) are reported through 9/17/2013 and include all grade 3, 4 and 5 events occurring during treatment to 30 days after treatment end, and events occurring >30 days after treatment end and felt to be possibly related to protocol treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Average-Risk Group—17/269 (6.3%)236/269 (87.7%)
High-Risk Group—17/144 (11.8%)118/144 (81.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 41
Most frequent serious events
EventAverage-Risk GroupHigh-Risk Group
CNS necrosis/cystic progressionNervous system disorders1/2693/144
SeizureNervous system disorders3/2693/144
Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neutrophils, bloodInfections and infestations0/2692/144
Leak, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)Nervous system disorders0/2692/144
Febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations2/2690/144
Infection with unknown ANC, meninges (meningitis)Infections and infestations2/2690/144
Pleural effusion (non-malignant)Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/2690/144
Supraventricular and nodal arrhythmia - sinus bradycardiaCardiac disorders0/2691/144
Cardiac general - otherCardiac disorders0/2691/144
Thrombotic microangiopathyVascular disorders0/2691/144
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventAverage-Risk GroupHigh-Risk Group
Febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations172/26977/144
Infection, bloodInfections and infestations55/26924/144
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders53/26921/144
Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity (including drug fever)Immune system disorders39/26923/144
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders27/26920/144
Pain, abdomen NOSGeneral disorders33/26917/144
Infection - otherInfections and infestations25/26916/144
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders23/26914/144
HypotensionCardiac disorders16/26914/144
Infection with unknown ANC, bloodInfections and infestations17/26913/144

Baseline characteristics

Participants had a diagnosis of medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), PNET variants (ependymoblastoma, pineoblastoma, CNS neuroblastoma), or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Average-Risk GroupHigh-Risk GroupTotal
Mean9.15 ± 4.088.66 ± 3.938.98 ± 4.03
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Average-Risk GroupHigh-Risk GroupTotal
Median8.42 (3.06 to 21.56)7.87 (3.13 to 20.43)8.33 (3.06 to 21.56)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Average-Risk GroupHigh-Risk GroupTotal
Female10556161
Male16488252
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
  • Texas Children's Cancer Center and Hematology Service at Texas Children's Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030-2399, United States
  • Sydney Children's Hospital
    Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia
  • Children's Hospital at Westmead
    Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
  • Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane
    Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
  • Royal Children's Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5S 0A4, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Acharya S, Guo Y, Patni T, Li Y, Wang C, Gargone M, Ashford JM, Wilson L, Faught A, Reddick WE, Patay Z, Gajjar A, Conklin HM, Merchant TE. Association Between Brain Substructure Dose and Cognitive Outcomes in Children With Medulloblastoma Treated on SJMB03: A Step Toward Substructure-Informed Planning. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;40(1):83-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01480. Epub 2021 Oct 29. PubMed 34714708 ↗
  • Partanen M, Anghelescu DL, Hall L, Schreiber JE, Rossi M, Gajjar A, Jacola LM. Longitudinal associations between exposure to anesthesia and neurocognitive functioning in pediatric medulloblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;148:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 17. PubMed 33743477 ↗
  • Kumar R, Smith KS, Deng M, Terhune C, Robinson GW, Orr BA, Liu APY, Lin T, Billups CA, Chintagumpala M, Bowers DC, Hassall TE, Hansford JR, Khuong-Quang DA, Crawford JR, Bendel AE, Gururangan S, Schroeder K, Bouffet E, Bartels U, Fisher MJ, Cohn R, Partap S, Kellie SJ, McCowage G, Paulino AC, Rutkowski S, Fleischhack G, Dhall G, Klesse LJ, Leary S, Nazarian J, Kool M, Wesseling P, Ryzhova M, Zheludkova O, Golanov AV, McLendon RE, Packer RJ, Dunham C, Hukin J, Fouladi M, Faria CC, Pimentel J, Walter AW, Jabado N, Cho YJ, Perreault S, Croul SE, Zapotocky M, Hawkins C, Tabori U, Taylor MD, Pfister SM, Klimo P Jr, Boop FA, Ellison DW, Merchant TE, Onar-Thomas A, Korshunov A, Jones DTW, Gajjar A, Ramaswamy V, Northcott PA. Clinical Outcomes and Patient-Matched Molecular Composition of Relapsed Medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):807-821. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01359. Epub 2021 Jan 27. PubMed 33502920 ↗
  • Gajjar A, Robinson GW, Smith KS, Lin T, Merchant TE, Chintagumpala M, Mahajan A, Su J, Bouffet E, Bartels U, Schechter T, Hassall T, Robertson T, Nicholls W, Gururangan S, Schroeder K, Sullivan M, Wheeler G, Hansford JR, Kellie SJ, McCowage G, Cohn R, Fisher MJ, Krasin MJ, Stewart CF, Broniscer A, Buchhalter I, Tatevossian RG, Orr BA, Neale G, Klimo P Jr, Boop F, Srinivasan A, Pfister SM, Gilbertson RJ, Onar-Thomas A, Ellison DW, Northcott PA. Outcomes by Clinical and Molecular Features in Children With Medulloblastoma Treated With Risk-Adapted Therapy: Results of an International Phase III Trial (SJMB03). J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):822-835. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01372. Epub 2021 Jan 6. PubMed 33405951 ↗
  • Xu H, Robinson GW, Huang J, Lim JY, Zhang H, Bass JK, Broniscer A, Chintagumpala M, Bartels U, Gururangan S, Hassall T, Fisher M, Cohn R, Yamashita T, Teitz T, Zuo J, Onar-Thomas A, Gajjar A, Stewart CF, Yang JJ. Common variants in ACYP2 influence susceptibility to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Nat Genet. 2015 Mar;47(3):263-6. doi: 10.1038/ng.3217. Epub 2015 Feb 9. Erratum In: Nat Genet. 2015 Apr;47(4):423. doi: 10.1038/ng0415-423. PubMed 25665007 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00085202
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2004
Start date
Aug 2003
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Results posted
Feb 27, 2014
Last update
Feb 8, 2024

Study contacts

Amar Gajjar, MD
principal investigator · St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Filgrastim · Cisplatin · Cyclophosphamide · Vincristine

Start the discussion