CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00082342Updated Dec 27, 2012Results posted

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Treat Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of Phoressor II (IOMED) and Phoressor II (IOMED) in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-12-27.

Sponsored by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on gait (walking) problems and rigidity in patients with Parkinson's disease. tDCS is a method of brain stimulation that may be able to change the electrical activity of the nerves of the brain, possibly causing Parkinson's disease symptoms to improve.

Patients between 40 and 80 years of age with moderately severe Parkinson's disease whose main symptoms are problems with walking, including freezing, or rigidity, may be eligible for this study. Candidates must be taking Sinemet or another L-DOPA drug and not have too much tremor.

Participants will be assigned to receive either real or sham (placebo) tDCS. Both groups will have eight treatments over 3-1/2 weeks. For the tDCS, electrodes are placed on wet pads on the scalp. An electrical current passes through the electrodes, travels through the scalp and skull, and causes small electrical currents in the cortex-the outer part of the brain. Participants will have a neurological examination, including an evaluation of walking, just before and just after each tDCS session. Patients' motor function will be re-evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last tDCS treatment.

...

Read the detailed description

The treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) needs further improvement, particularly in the areas of gait and freezing. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) which passes weak direct current (DC) current through the skull and across the cortex has been done for many years with numerous effects described in healthy subjects and patients with mental illness. Recently, it has been shown by objective means, in controlled experiments, that this type of treatment has robust and lasting effects on the excitability of the motor cortex in healthy humans. We hypothesize that tDCS will have a beneficial effect on gait and freezing in medicated patients, and we propose to test this in a controlled trial. Specifically, we propose to look at the effect of 1-2 mA tDCS with anode position over the frontal poles and/or premotor and primary motor cortex, and cathode over mastoid process. Over a one-year period, we will enroll 42 adults with PD and evaluate the acute tDCS effects over a period of four weeks (eight tDCS sessions, nine visits). Additional ratings will be done at one and three months after the end of tDCS sessions. Symptoms will be evaluated with standard tests of motor function, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and specific tests of gait and freezing. We will also look for cumulative, long-lasting effects over the three-month period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Human Brain
  • Electrical Stimulation
  • Parkinson Disease
  • PD
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) is the lead sponsor of 592 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with PD corresponding to inclusion criteria will be recruited from the Human Motor Control Section Clinic (HMCS).

Subjects will be men and women aged 40-80 years with DOPA-responsive, akinetic-rigid PD.

Patients who have never participated in HMCS protocols for PD will be interviewed and examined by either the principal investigator or a physician from the Brain Stimulation Unit or HMCS in order to establish the diagnosis of PD and rule out any neurological condition. Only patients with a Hoehm and Yahr grade of 2 to 4 while "off" will be accepted.

Patients must be on a regimen including levodopa. The total dose of levodopa and dopamine agonists (using dopamine equivalents) has to be equal to or more than 375 milligrams per day. Other anti-parkinsonian medications are also acceptable.

Patients should have problems with walking, including freezing, so that their gait time for a 10-meter distance will be six seconds or more.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Exclusion criteria are any significant medical or psychiatric illnesses (except those symptoms often associated with PD or levodopa therapy, such as sundowning and benign hallucination), pallidotomy, implanted electrodes and generator for deep brain stimulation, pregnancy.

Persons with surgically or traumatically implanted foreign bodies such as a pacemaker, implanted medical pump, implanted hearing aids, metal plate in the skull, or metal implant in the skull or eyes (other than dental appliances or fillings) that may pose a physical hazard during TEP will also be excluded. Most of these exclusions also come under the category of significant medical illness.

Patients for whom participation in the study would, in the opinion of the investigators, cause undue risk or stress for reasons such as tendency to fall, excessive fatigue, general frailty, or excessive apprehensiveness will also be excluded.

Patients unable to walk a 10-meter distance will be excluded.

Mentally impaired patients having no capacity to provide their own consent will be excluded from the study.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    real transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Device: Phoressor II (IOMED)

  • Sham comparator
    sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Device: Phoressor II (IOMED)

Interventions

  • DevicePhoressor II (IOMED)

    sham stimulation

  • DevicePhoressor II (IOMED)

    real tDCS stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Speed Before and After Real and Sham tDCS.

    Gait speed was measured by the time it took the subject to walk 10m. Subjects were instructed to walk at a fast pace without taking the risk of falling, wearing the same shoes and using assistive devices consistently if needed. Gait speed was measured at baseline and post-tDCS.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, 3 months post-tDCS

Secondary outcomes

  1. UPDRS Total Scores Before and After Real tDCS Course and After Sham tDCS Course.

    The Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is an overall clinical rating scale that quantifies the signs and symptoms of Parkinson's disease. The total UPDRS score was obtained from subject examination, subject interviews and questionnaires. The UPDRS encompasses measurement of mentation, behavior, mood, activities of daily living and motor skills. The total UPDRS scores ranges from 0 (not affected) to 176 (most severely affected). The UPDRS was administred at baseline and at 1 day post, 1 month post, and 3 months post tDCS or sham, while on medication and off medication.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, 3 months post-tDCS

  2. UPDRS Motor Scores Before and After Real tDCS Course and After Sham tDCS Course.

    The Motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) includes only the motor assessment of the UPDRS (Part III) and examines speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability and body bradykinesia. The scores range from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). The Motor UPDRS was administred at baseline and at 1 day post, 1 month post, and 3 months post tDCS or sham. Subjects were assessed on medication and off medication.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, and 3 months post real and sham tDCS

  3. Bradykinesia Measure Before and After Real and Sham tDCS.

    Bradykinesia refers to the slowness in executing a movement. Bradykinesia was assessed by measuring the time in seconds it takes to do the following sequence, 10 times: 1) hand closing and opening while squeezing a ball 2) elbow flexion 3) hand closing and opening, and 4) elbow extension. Subjects were allowed to practice these hand and arm movements until performance appeared not to get faster, and then were abstained from further practice to minimize learning effects. The time it takes subjects to execute the entire sequence 10 times with either the left or right arm/hand was measured. Means are reported for each group.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, 3 months post tDCS

07

Results

Posted Dec 27, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneReal tDCSSham tDCS
Started1312
Completed1312
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryGait Speed Before and After Real and Sham tDCS.

Gait speed was measured by the time it took the subject to walk 10m. Subjects were instructed to walk at a fast pace without taking the risk of falling, wearing the same shoes and using assistive devices consistently if needed. Gait speed was measured at baseline and post-tDCS.

Time frame:
baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, 3 months post-tDCS
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
Gait Speed Before and After Real and Sham tDCS.
SecondsReal tDCS While on MedicationSham tDCS While on MedicationReal tDCS While Off MedicationSham tDCS While Off Medication
Baseline8.7 ± 2.48.6 ± 2.69.7 ± 3.69.5 ± 4.1
One day post tDCS7.2 ± 1.67.6 ± 1.57.5 ± 1.59.8 ± 4.7
One month post tDCS7.0 ± 1.28.7 ± 3.77.6 ± 1.410.9 ± 7.3
Three month post tDCS7.2 ± 1.58.8 ± 4.29.0 ± 4.89.7 ± 4.6
SecondaryUPDRS Total Scores Before and After Real tDCS Course and After Sham tDCS Course.

The Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is an overall clinical rating scale that quantifies the signs and symptoms of Parkinson's disease. The total UPDRS score was obtained from subject examination, subject interviews and questionnaires. The UPDRS encompasses measurement of mentation, behavior, mood, activities of daily living and motor skills. The total UPDRS scores ranges from 0 (not affected) to 176 (most severely affected). The UPDRS was administred at baseline and at 1 day post, 1 month post, and 3 months post tDCS or sham, while on medication and off medication.

Time frame:
baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, 3 months post-tDCS
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
UPDRS Total Scores Before and After Real tDCS Course and After Sham tDCS Course.
units on a scaleReal tDCS While on MedicationSham tDCS While on MedicationReal tDCS While Off MedicationSham tDCS While Off Medication
Baseline42.5 ± 10.839.5 ± 12.858.4 ± 14.753.6 ± 14.5
1 day post tDCS36.9 ± 11.132.0 ± 11.754.1 ± 13.150.4 ± 16.2
1 month post tDCS42.5 ± 7.836.1 ± 11.056.1 ± 13.254.4 ± 12.1
3 months post tDCS43.4 ± 9.135.5 ± 13.860.1 ± 13.652.4 ± 17.0
SecondaryUPDRS Motor Scores Before and After Real tDCS Course and After Sham tDCS Course.

The Motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) includes only the motor assessment of the UPDRS (Part III) and examines speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability and body bradykinesia. The scores range from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). The Motor UPDRS was administred at baseline and at 1 day post, 1 month post, and 3 months post tDCS or sham. Subjects were assessed on medication and off medication.

Time frame:
baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, and 3 months post real and sham tDCS
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
UPDRS Motor Scores Before and After Real tDCS Course and After Sham tDCS Course.
units on a scaleReal tDCS While on MedicationSham tDCS While on MedicationReal tDCS While Off MedicationSham tDCS While Off Medication
Baseline22.2 ± 8.717.5 ± 8.034.0 ± 10.026.5 ± 8.4
1 day post tDCS20.4 ± 7.715.6 ± 7.931.5 ± 7.329.0 ± 11.7
1 month post tDCS22.7 ± 6.618.6 ± 8.131.4 ± 9.929.0 ± 8.1
3 months post tDCS23.1 ± 7.817.6 ± 8.534.0 ± 10.327.1 ± 10.5
SecondaryBradykinesia Measure Before and After Real and Sham tDCS.

Bradykinesia refers to the slowness in executing a movement. Bradykinesia was assessed by measuring the time in seconds it takes to do the following sequence, 10 times: 1) hand closing and opening while squeezing a ball 2) elbow flexion 3) hand closing and opening, and 4) elbow extension. Subjects were allowed to practice these hand and arm movements until performance appeared not to get faster, and then were abstained from further practice to minimize learning effects. The time it takes subjects to execute the entire sequence 10 times with either the left or right arm/hand was measured. Means are reported for each group.

Time frame:
baseline, 1 day post, 1 month post, 3 months post tDCS
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Bradykinesia Measure Before and After Real and Sham tDCS.
secondsReal tDCS While on MedicationSham tDCS While on MedicationReal tDCS While Off MedicationSham tDCS While Off Medication
Baseline12.3 ± 3.512.3 ± 4.014.5 ± 4.514.4 ± 5.3
1 day post tDCS8.5 ± 1.810.5 ± 2.38.9 ± 1.811.1 ± 2.6
1 month post tDCS9.1 ± 2.010.5 ± 2.39.4 ± 1.911.7 ± 3.8
3 months post tDCS9.0 ± 1.810.4 ± 2.59.7 ± 2.011.6 ± 4.0

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Real tDCS—0/13 (0%)1/13 (7.7%)
Sham tDCS—0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventReal tDCSSham tDCS
BurnSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/130/12

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Real tDCSSham tDCSTotal
Mean63.6 ± 9.064.2 ± 8.863.9 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Real tDCSSham tDCSTotal
Female459
Male9716
Hoehn-Yahr on medication
Hoehn-Yahr on medication(units on a scale)Real tDCSSham tDCSTotal
Mean2.5 ± 0.12.4 ± 0.22.42 ± 0.2
Hoehn-Yahr off medication
Hoehn-Yahr off medication(units on scale)Real tDCSSham tDCSTotal
Mean2.7 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.42.8 ± 0.4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Agnew WF, McCreery DB. Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery. 1987 Jan;20(1):143-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-198701000-00030. PubMed 3808255 ↗
  • Antal A, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport. 2001 Nov 16;12(16):3553-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00036. PubMed 11733710 ↗
  • Braun BL. Treatment of an acute anterior disk displacement in the temporomandibular joint. A case report. Phys Ther. 1987 Aug;67(8):1234-6. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.8.1234. PubMed 3615594 ↗
  • Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Lopez G, Wassermann EM, Li X, Considine E, Hallett M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;81(10):1105-11. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.202556. Erratum In: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;82(3):354. PubMed 20870863 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 27, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00082342
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Responsible party
Mark Hallett (Principal Investigator, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2004
Start date
Mar 2003
Primary completion
Feb 2009
Results posted
Dec 27, 2012
Last update
Dec 27, 2012
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion