CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00078754Updated Apr 27, 2021Results posted

A Comparison of Fluoxetine and Divalproex for the Treatment of Intermittent Explosive Disorder

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fluoxetine and Divalproex in Intermittent Explosive Disorder, sponsored by University of Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-27.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare the medications fluoxetine (Prozac®) and divalproex (Depakote®) for the treatment of aggressive behavior in individuals with Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED).

Read the detailed description

IED is a condition characterized by a failure to resist aggressive impulses. IED is a behavioral defined condition for which effective treatments have not been identified. Research suggests that serotonin (5-HT), a chemical that helps regulate mood and emotions, may play a role in the response to pharmacological IED treatments. This study will examine the relationship between 5-HT receptors and response to treatment with fluoxetine or divalproex. In addition, this study will examine people with IED and those without the condition to determine whether there are differences in their 5-HT receptor and transporter systems.

Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine, divalproex, or placebo for 12 weeks. Scale ratings will be used to assess the aggression levels of participants. Biologic evaluations of the 5-HT system will be conducted throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intermittent Explosive Disorder
03

In context

Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 45 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders.

Browse Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 907 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED)
  • In good physical health
  • Overt Aggression Scale-Modified (OAS-M) score of 15 or higher at screening
  • Willing and able to comply with the study requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, organic mental syndrome, or mental retardation
  • Current major depressive disorder, with a Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) Scale score higher than 18
  • Current alcohol or drug abuse or dependence
  • Active medical conditions that will interfere with the study
  • Thymoleptic or neuroleptic treatments
  • Presence of the following serious and active medical conditions: demyelinating or progressive degenerative disorders; central nervous system infection; progressive degenerative neurological disorder; ischemic heart disease; respiratory, renal, or liver disease; Type I diabetes; malignant neoplasm; hyper- or hypo-coagulopathy; Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS); or seizure disorder. Participants with a history of more than two febrile seizures prior to 1 year of age are eligible.
  • Chronic, ongoing treatment with the following classes of medications: antidepressants, neuroleptics, mood stabilizers, antianxiety agents, hypnotics, narcotics or synthetic narcotics, barbiturates, stimulants, anti-migraine agents, anti-epileptics, non-beta-blocking or Ca-channel blocking anti-arrhythmic agents prescribed to treat cardiac arrhythmia, anticoagulants, immunomodulators, anti-neoplastic agents, or HIV antiviral agents
  • Ongoing psychotherapeutic treatment for the treatment of IED or anger that was started less than 3 months before study entry
  • Hypersensitivity to fluoxetine or divalproex
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A

    Participants will to receive treatment with fluoxetine for 12 weeks

    Drug: Fluoxetine

  • Experimental
    B

    Participants will to receive treatment with divalproex for 12 weeks

    Drug: Divalproex

  • Placebo comparator
    C

    Participants will to receive treatment with placebo for 12 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugFluoxetine

    Fluoxetine capsules by mouth, up to 60 mg daily

  • DrugDivalproex

    Divalproex ER capsules by mouth, up to 3000 mg daily

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsules by mouth, up to 8 capsules daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overt Aggression Scale-Modified for Outpatient Use (OAS-M)

    OAS-M is a validated instrument that measures aggression. Anti-aggressive effect of the drug/placebo was measured by the aggression score from OAS-M. Possible scores for aggression range from 0 (no aggression) to infinity (because the score is calculated by the number of times an aggressive behavior occurred, which theoretically has no possible maximum). Therefore the bigger number, the worse anti-aggression effect, thus the worse outcome. In each weekly visit, OAS-M score was calculated for the past week.

    Time frame: Measured at Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. OAS-M

    Overt Aggression Scale Modified for Outpatient Use. Minimum value = 0 Maximum value = Infinity. Higher scores means worse outcome.

    Time frame: Measured at Week 12

07

Results

Posted Dec 31, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Most participants did not have stable OAS-M Aggression scores from screening to randomization. Note that this was not a requirement for this study; only that OAS-Aggression scores were 15 or higher at screening.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - Placebo
Started293031
Completed141116
Not completed151915

Outcome measures

PrimaryOvert Aggression Scale-Modified for Outpatient Use (OAS-M)

OAS-M is a validated instrument that measures aggression. Anti-aggressive effect of the drug/placebo was measured by the aggression score from OAS-M. Possible scores for aggression range from 0 (no aggression) to infinity (because the score is calculated by the number of times an aggressive behavior occurred, which theoretically has no possible maximum). Therefore the bigger number, the worse anti-aggression effect, thus the worse outcome. In each weekly visit, OAS-M score was calculated for the past week.

Time frame:
Measured at Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Overt Aggression Scale-Modified for Outpatient Use (OAS-M)
units on a scaleGroup A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - Placebo
Overt Aggression Scale-Modified for Outpatient Use (OAS-M)7.86 ± 4.1115.73 ± 10.158.88 ± 3.51
Statistical analysis
  • Group A - Fluoxetine Drug vs Group B - Divalproex Drug vs Group C - Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.622
SecondaryOAS-M

Overt Aggression Scale Modified for Outpatient Use. Minimum value = 0 Maximum value = Infinity. Higher scores means worse outcome.

Time frame:
Measured at Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
OAS-M
score on a scaleFluoxetineDivalproexPlacebo
High Aggression Group13.2 ± 5.013.7 ± 4.819.5 ± 5.1
Medium Aggression Group25.1 ± 7.629.6 ± 8.026.9 ± 7.1
Statistical analysis
  • Fluoxetine · ANCOVA · p = 0.029 (LHA score main effect.)The LHA Score F\[1,83\] = 4.91, p = 0.029; Condition F\[2,83\] = 0.20, p = 0.815; Condition x LHA Score F\[2,83\] = 0.255, p = 0.799.
  • Fluoxetine vs Divalproex · ANCOVA · p = 0.80 · Mean difference (final values): 19.0Baseline OAS-M Aggression score as covariate.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group A - Fluoxetine Drug—1/29 (3.4%)23/29 (79.3%)
Group B - Divalproex Drug—0/30 (0%)23/30 (76.7%)
Group C - Placebo—0/31 (0%)24/31 (77.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - Placebo
hyponatremia/hypokalemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/290/300/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventGroup A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - Placebo
Soreness in your muscle, back, jointsInvestigations13/2917/3016/31
Feeling tense or keyed upInvestigations14/2911/3014/31
DrowsinessInvestigations8/2912/3010/31
Trouble remembering thingsInvestigations9/296/307/31
Nausea or upset stomachInvestigations5/299/309/31
Dry mouthInvestigations5/299/304/31
SweatingInvestigations6/299/304/31
HeadachesInvestigations7/296/308/31
Nervousness or shakiness insideInvestigations6/296/304/31
Heart pounding or racingInvestigations6/296/305/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - PlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years29303190
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - PlaceboTotal
Female14101640
Male15201550
overt aggression scale-modified (OAS-M).
overt aggression scale-modified (OAS-M).(units on a scale)Group A - Fluoxetine DrugGroup B - Divalproex DrugGroup C - PlaceboTotal
Mean36.75 ± 46.8836.96 ± 26.4266.08 ± 77.9947.30 ± 56.68
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00078754
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2004
Start date
May 2003
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
Dec 31, 2014
Last update
Apr 27, 2021

Study contacts

Emil F. Coccaro, MD
principal investigator · University of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion