CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00002870Updated Dec 16, 2014

High Dose Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Therapy in Treating Women With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of filgrastim and cyclophosphamide in Breast Cancer, sponsored by UNICANCER. Completed at 32 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-12-16.

Sponsored by UNICANCER · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 59 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs to kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard therapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of standard therapy in treating women who have locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the effect on 3-year survival of intensive chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/thiotepa with peripheral blood stem cell rescue in women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who respond to induction therapy with epirubicin/fluorouracil/cyclophosphamide. II. Evaluate the effects of this intensive treatment on patient quality of life. III. Evaluate tumor response and progression-free survival after intensification.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by clinical/therapeutic hormone sensitivity and participating institution. All patients receive induction therapy with epirubicin, fluorouracil, and cyclophosphamide (FEC 100) every 3 weeks for up to 4 courses, with response evaluated after at least 2 courses. Patients with a complete response or at least a 50% partial response are randomized either to no further therapy or to receive intensification chemotherapy. Patients randomized to intensification undergo peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest with G-CSF mobilization after the third or fourth induction course. Three to 6 weeks after induction, patients receive intensification chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/thiotepa followed by PBSC. Post-transplant G-CSF is given for hematopoietic support. No concurrent hormonal therapy is permitted during induction; local irradiation of multifocal tumors is allowed provided response is still evaluable. Local therapy (excision of single metastasis, radiotherapy to metastatic site) is permitted after completion of protocol therapy. Treatment of relapsed disease is at the discretion of the investigator. Patients are followed every 3 months for 3 years or until relapse, then every 6 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 180 patients will be accrued over 3 years in this multicenter study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stage IV breast cancer
  • recurrent breast cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

UNICANCER is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically or cytologically proven glandular breast cancer Metastatic or locoregionally relapsed disease for which curative surgery and/or radiotherapy is not feasible Histologic/cytologic confirmation of metastasis as feasible Progression required within the month prior to entry, whether or not it occurs on hormonal therapy No clinically detectable cerebral or meningeal involvement Measurable lesion required, including soft tissue site, lymphadenopathy, or visceral site The following are not considered measurable: Bony sites of involvement Ascites Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis Skin lesions Pathologic CEA or CA 15.3 levels Laboratory changes Pleural effusion Hormone receptor status: Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Under 60 Sex: Women only Menopausal status: Not specified Performance status: WHO 0-2 Life expectancy: Greater than 3 months Hematopoietic: ANC at least 2,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 2.0 mg/dL (35 micromoles/L) Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.3 mg/dL (130 micromoles/L) Cardiovascular: No congestive heart failure, even if stable No coronary artery disease No myocardial infarction within 6 months Ventricular ejection fraction (resting) normal by isotopic scan or echocardiogram No evidence of cardiac disease on EKG Other: No active infection No second malignancy except: In situ cervical carcinoma Basal cell skin carcinoma No pregnant women No psychological, familial, social, or geographical contraindication to regular follow-up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior palliative chemotherapy At least 1 year since adjuvant chemotherapy Maximum prior cumulative anthracycline doses as follows: Epirubicin no greater than 450 mg per square meter Doxorubicin no greater than 300 mg per square meter Pirarubicin no greater than 300 mg per square meter Mitoxantrone no greater than 60 mg per square meter Endocrine therapy: Prior hormonal therapy allowed See Disease Characteristics Radiotherapy: At least 6 weeks since radiotherapy to more than one third of hematopoietic regions Surgery: Not specified

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • Biologicalfilgrastim
  • Drugcyclophosphamide
  • Drugepirubicin hydrochloride
  • Drugfluorouracil
  • Drugthiotepa
  • Procedureperipheral blood stem cell transplantation
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease free survival

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

32 sites
  • Centre Paul Papin
    Angers, 49036, France
  • CHR de Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz
    Besancon, 25030, France
  • Clinique Saint Vincent
    Besancon, 25044, France
  • Institut Bergonie
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • C.H. Bourg En Bresse
    Bourg En Bresse, 01012, France
  • C.H.U. de Brest
    Brest, 29200, France
  • Centre Hospitalier General
    Brive, France
  • Centre Regional Francois Baclesse
    Caen, 14076, France
  • Centre Jean Perrin
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France
  • Hopital Louis Pasteur
    Colmar, 68024, France
  • Centre de Lute Contre le Cancer,Georges-Francois Leclerc
    Dijon, 21079, France
  • Institut Prive de Cancerologie
    Grenoble, 38100, France
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, 59020, France
  • Centre Leon Berard
    Lyon, 69373, France
  • Institut J. Paoli and I. Calmettes
    Marseille, 13273, France
  • Hopital Notre-Dame de Bon Secours
    Metz, 55038, France
  • Hopital Sainte Blandine
    Metz, 57045, France
  • Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle
    Montpellier, 34298, France
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne
    Nice, 06189, France
  • Hopital Saint-Louis
    Paris, 75475, France
  • Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer
    Paris, 75654, France
  • Hopital Tenon
    Paris, 75970, France
  • Hopital Haut Leveque
    Pessac, 33604, France
  • Hopital Jean Bernard
    Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Institut Jean Godinot
    Reims, 51056, France
  • Centre Eugene Marquis
    Rennes, 35062, France
  • C.H.U. Saint Etienne Hospital Nord
    Saint Etienne, 42055, France
  • Hopitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
  • Institut Claudius Regaud
    Toulouse, 31052, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau de Tours
    Tours, 37044, France
  • Centre Alexis Vautrin
    Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54511, France
  • CHRU de Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois
    Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, 54511, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Biron P, Durand M, Roche H, Delozier T, Battista C, Fargeot P, Spaeth D, Bachelot T, Poiget E, Monnot F, Tanguy ML, Cure H. Pegase 03: a prospective randomized phase III trial of FEC with or without high-dose thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplantation in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Mar;41(6):555-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705935. Epub 2007 Nov 26. PubMed 18037940 ↗
  • Biron P, Durand M, Roche H, et al.: High dose thiotepa (TTP), cyclophosphamide (CPM) and stem cell transplantation after 4 FEC 100 compared with 4 FEC alone allowed a better disease free survival but the same overall survival in first line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of the PEGASE 03 French protocole. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology A-167, 2002.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 16, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00002870
Lead sponsor
UNICANCER
First posted
May 12, 2004
Start date
Dec 1994
Primary completion
Jan 2002
Completion
Jan 2002
Last update
Dec 16, 2014

Study contacts

Pierre Biron, MD
study chair · Centre Leon Berard

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion