CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00002706Updated May 29, 2015

Laparoscopic Surgery or Standard Surgery in Treating Patients With Endometrial Cancer or Cancer of the Uterus

A Phase 3 interventional study of Laparoscopic Surgery and Quality-of-Life Assessment in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma, Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer and Stage I Uterine Sarcoma, sponsored by Gynecologic Oncology Group. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-29.

Sponsored by Gynecologic Oncology Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,616
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized phase III trial is studying laparoscopic surgery to see how well it works compared to standard surgery in treating patients with endometrial cancer or cancer of the uterus. Laparoscopic surgery is a less invasive type of surgery for cancer of the uterus and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. It is not known whether laparoscopic surgery is more effective than standard surgery in treating endometrial cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

I. Compare the incidence of surgical complications, peri-operative morbidity, and mortality in patients with stage I or IIa, grade I-III endometrial cancer or uterine cancer undergoing surgical staging through laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy.

II. Compare the length of hospital stay after surgery in patients receiving these treatments.

III. Compare the quality of life of patients receiving these treatments. IV. Compare the incidence and location of disease recurrence in patients receiving these treatments.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) via laparoscopy.

ARM II: Patients undergo total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO via conventional laparotomy.

Patients in both arms also undergo pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 weeks, and then at 6 months.

Patients are followed at 6 weeks, every 3 months for 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Adenocarcinoma
  • Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer
  • Stage I Uterine Sarcoma
  • Stage II Uterine Corpus Cancer
  • Stage II Uterine Sarcoma
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma

2,004 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma; 375 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,616 is above the median of 45 across 1,553 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma.

Browse Adenocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Gynecologic Oncology Group is the lead sponsor of 181 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stage I or IIA, grade I-III endometrial adenocarcinoma or uterine sarcoma
  • Must be considered a candidate for surgery
  • No contraindication to laparoscopy
  • No clinical or chest x-ray evidence of metastasis beyond the uterine corpus or macroscopic involvement of the endocervix
  • Performance status - GOG 0-3
  • WBC at least 3,000/mm\^3
  • Platelet count at least 100,000/mm\^3
  • Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal
  • SGOT no greater than 3 times normal
  • Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL
  • Prior malignancy allowed if no current evidence of disease
  • Not pregnant
  • No prior pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior retroperitoneal surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,616 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I

    Patients undergo vaginal hysterectomy and BSO via laparoscopy.

    Procedure: Laparoscopic Surgery · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment

  • Active comparator
    Arm II

    Patients undergo total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO via conventional laparotomy.

    Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment · Procedure: Therapeutic Conventional Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic Surgery

    Undergo vaginal hysterectomy and BSO via laparoscopy

    Also known as: laparoscopic-assisted resection, laparoscopy-assisted surgery

  • OtherQuality-of-Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

    Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment

  • ProcedureTherapeutic Conventional Surgery

    Undergo total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO via conventional laparotomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of disease-free interval

    The usual logrank test or a proportional hazards model will be used to assess the equality of the hazard rates between the surgical procedures.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  2. Frequency of aborting LAVH in order to perform an TAH/BSO

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  3. Frequency of major surgical complications, graded according to the NCI CTC and classified as either less than grade 2 or grade 2 or worse

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  4. Length of hospitalization following surgery

    A proportional odds model will be used to estimate the treatment difference while adjusting for potential confounding factors.

    Time frame: From the date of surgery to the date of discharge, assessed up to 5 years

  5. Self assessed quality of life scores as measured by FACT-G, Physical Function Subscale from the MOS SF-36, Wisconsin Brief Pain Inventory, Fear of Relapse/Recurrence scale, and Personal Appearance scale

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gynecologic Oncology Group
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bishop EA, Java JJ, Moore KN, Spirtos NM, Pearl ML, Zivanovic O, Kushner DM, Backes F, Hamilton CA, Geller MA, Hurteau J, Mathews C, Wenham RM, Ramirez PT, Zweizig S, Walker JL. Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):109.e1-109.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.026. Epub 2017 Oct 14. PubMed 29037481 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00002706
Lead sponsor
Gynecologic Oncology Group
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2003
Start date
Apr 1996
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Last update
May 29, 2015

Study contacts

Joan Walker
principal investigator · Gynecologic Oncology Group
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion