CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00002678Updated Apr 2, 2020

Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3 interventional study of dexamethasone and melphalan in Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm, sponsored by NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Completed at 37 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-02.

Sponsored by NCIC Clinical Trials Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was May 2004, 22 years 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 4 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 1995, registered Nov 1999).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
595
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is most effective in treating patients with multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of various combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with multiple myeloma.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the overall survival of patients with previously untreated stage I-III multiple myelome treated with melphalan combined with dexamethasone or prednisone as induction therapy.
  • Compare the overall survival of patients with stable or responding disease after induction treated with dexamethasone vs observation alone as maintenance therapy.
  • Compare the time to progression, response rate, and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center, stage (I or II vs III), creatinine (less than 2.0 mg/dL vs 2.0 mg/dL or greater), and intention to use prophylactic bisphosphonate (yes vs no).

  • Induction: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.

    • Arms I and II: Patients receive induction comprising oral prednisone followed by oral melphalan on days 1-4.
    • Arms III and IV: Patients receive induction comprising oral melphalan and oral dexamethasone (DM) on days 1-4 of all courses and DM on days 15-18 of courses 1-3.

Induction for arms I-IV continues every 4 weeks for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with stable or responding disease after induction proceed to maintenance therapy.

  • Maintenance:

    • Arms I and III: Patients undergo observation.
    • Arms II and IV: Patients receive oral DM on days 1-4. Maintenance therapy continues every 4 weeks for arms II and IV and every 3 months for arms I and III in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients on arms I-IV who develop disease progression proceed to reinduction.
  • Reinduction: Patients restart induction on the arm to which they were originally randomized. Reinduction continues every 4 weeks in the absence of stable response lasting 16 weeks, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who achieve a stable response lasting 16 weeks restart maintenance therapy. Patients who experience further disease progression during reinduction are taken off study.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, on day 1 of courses 1-3 and then every 3 courses during induction, and then every 3 months during maintenance therapy.

Patients are followed every 6 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 600 patients will be accrued for this study within 6 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm

Keywords

  • stage I multiple myeloma
  • stage II multiple myeloma
  • stage III multiple myeloma
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 595 is above the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

NCIC Clinical Trials Group is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (26%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically proven previously untreated stage I-III multiple myeloma

    • Patients with stage I disease must be symptomatic
  • Must meet at least 1 of the following conditions:

    • Plasma cells in osteolytic lesion or soft tissue tumor biopsy
    • At least 10% plasmacytosis in bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy
    • Less than 10% plasma cells in bone marrow but at least 1 bony lesion
  • Detectable serum M-component of IgG, IgA, IgD, or IgE

    • If only light chain disease (urine M-protein) present, urinary excretion of light chain (Bence Jones) protein must be at least 1.0 g/24 hours

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • 18 and over

Performance status:

  • ECOG 0-4

Life expectancy:

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic:

  • Not specified

Hepatic:

  • Not specified

Renal:

  • Not specified

Other:

  • No other concurrent serious illness
  • Concurrent diabetes allowed, at the discretion of the treating physician, if changes in insulin requirements can be managed
  • No other prior or concurrent malignancy except curatively treated nonmelanomatous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

  • No concurrent immunizations
  • No concurrent filgrastim (G-CSF) or other growth factors as prophylaxis
  • Concurrent epoetin alfa for anemia allowed

Chemotherapy:

  • No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • Prior dexamethasone or prednisone with radiotherapy for spinal cord compression allowed if cumulative dexamethasone dose no greater than 120 mg and cumulative prednisone dose no greater than 792 mg
  • Prior or concurrent corticosteroids for hypercalcemia allowed

Radiotherapy:

  • See Endocrine therapy
  • Prior focal radiotherapy allowed
  • Concurrent focal radiotherapy during induction allowed
  • Concurrent radiotherapy for palliation (e.g., painful osteolytic lesions or spinal cord compression) allowed

Surgery:

  • At least 2 years since prior surgery for radiologic or endoscopic diagnosis of gastric or duodenal ulcer

Other:

  • At least 2 years since prior medication for radiologic or endoscopic diagnosis of gastric or duodenal ulcer
  • Prior or concurrent bisphosphonates for hypercalcemia allowed
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
595 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Melphan plus prednisone

    melphalan plus prednisone qd x 4 28 day cycles x 12 cycles; No treatment after stable response.

    Drug: melphalan · Drug: prednisone

  • Active comparator
    Melphan, prednisone pluse dexamethasone

    melphalan plus prednisone qd x 4 28 day cycles x 12 cycles; dexamethasone qd x 4 q 28 days after non-progression

    Drug: dexamethasone

Interventions

  • Drugdexamethasone

    40 mg daily for four days given orally and repeated every 28 days should commence on day 29 of the twelfth cycle of induction therapy.

  • Drugmelphalan

    9 mg/m2 daily for 4 days given orally on an empty stomach every 4 weeks

  • Drugprednisone

    100 mg daily for 4 days given orally on a full stomach with each cycle of melphalan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    To compare overall survival between: i) patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and those receiving melphalan-dexamethasone as induction therapy ii) patients maintained by dexamethasone and those on no additional treatment in the subgroup whose disease has not progressed at the time of the 12th induction cycle

    Time frame: 9 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to progression

    Time frame: 9 years

  2. Response rates

    Time frame: 9 years

  3. Toxicity

    Time frame: 9 years

  4. Quality of Life

    Time frame: 9 years

07

Study locations

37 sites
  • St. Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Cross Cancer Institute
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior
    Kelowna, British Columbia V1Y 5L3, Canada
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Providence Health Care - Vancouver
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
    Victoria, British Columbia V8R 6V5, Canada
  • Moncton Hospital
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 6ZB, Canada
  • Doctor Leon Richard Oncology Centre
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8X3, Canada
  • Saint John Regional Hospital
    Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L2, Canada
  • Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation
    St. Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador A1B 3V6, Canada
  • Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9, Canada
  • William Osler Health Centre
    Brampton, Ontario L6W 2Z8, Canada
  • Cancer Care Ontario-Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre
    Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada
  • Kingston Regional Cancer Centre
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 5P9, Canada
  • Cancer Care Ontario-London Regional Cancer Centre
    London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada
  • Trillium Health Centre
    Mississauga, Ontario L5B 1B8, Canada
  • Credit Valley Hospital
    Mississauga, Ontario L5M 2N1, Canada
  • Southlake Regional Health Centre
    Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 2P9, Canada
  • Lakeridge Health Oshawa
    Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
  • Algoma District Medical Group
    Sault Sainte Marie, Ontario P6B 1Y5, Canada
  • Hotel Dieu Health Sciences Hospital - Niagara
    St. Catharines, Ontario L2R 5K3, Canada
  • Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Sudbury
    Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5J1, Canada
  • Toronto East General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M4C 3E7, Canada
  • Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • St. Michael's Hospital - Toronto
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Humber River Regional Hospital
    Weston, Ontario M9N 1N8, Canada
  • Cancer Care Ontario - Windsor Regional Cancer Centre
    Windsor, Ontario N8W 2X3, Canada
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital, PEI
    Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 8T5, Canada
  • CHUS-Hopital Fleurimont
    Fleurimont, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
  • Hopital Charles Lemoyne
    Greenfield Park, Quebec J4V 2H1, Canada
  • McGill University
    Montreal, Quebec H2W 1S6, Canada
  • Hopital de L'Enfant Jesus
    Quebec City, Quebec G1J 1Z4, Canada
  • Hopital du Saint-Sacrement, Quebec
    Quebec City, Quebec G1S 4L8, Canada
  • Allan Blair Cancer Centre
    Regina, Saskatchewan S4T 7T1, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shustik C, Belch A, Robinson S, Rubin SH, Dolan SP, Kovacs MJ, Grewal KS, Walde D, Barr R, Wilson J, Gill K, Vickars L, Rudinskas L, Sicheri DA, Wilson K, Djurfeldt M, Shepherd LE, Ding K, Meyer RM. A randomised comparison of melphalan with prednisone or dexamethasone as induction therapy and dexamethasone or observation as maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: NCIC CTG MY.7. Br J Haematol. 2007 Jan;136(2):203-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06405.x. PubMed 17233817 ↗
  • Shustik C, Belch A, Robinson S, et al.: Dexamethasone (dex) maintenance versus observation (obs) in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study: MY.7. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl 14): A-6510, 560s, 2004.
  • Shustik C, Belch A, Meyer R, et al.: Melphalan-dexamethasone is not superior to melphalan-prednisone as induction therapy in multiple myeloma. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-1191, 2001.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00002678
Lead sponsor
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2003
Start date
Jun 2, 1995
Primary completion
May 3, 2004
Completion
Dec 21, 2009
Last update
Apr 2, 2020

Study contacts

Chaim Shustik, MD
study chair · Royal Victoria Hospital - Montreal

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion