Al-Azhar University: Malocclusion trials

The registry lists 24 Malocclusion studies with Al-Azhar University as lead sponsor. 4 are open to participants now and 0 have results posted.

Phase 2 2Phase 3 3No phase 21(a study in two phases counts in both)

Studies

Open to participants first, then studies with results posted, then the rest; newest registration first within each.

• Assessment of the Locally Administrated Vitamin D3 and Corticision Efficacy on Orthodontic Canine RetractionRecruitingNCT07455656Not applicable
• Validation of AI-Based Cephalometric Analysis in OrthodonticsNot yet recruitingNCT07315152
• Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable Platelet-rich Plasma in Tooth Movement Acceleration With Clear AlignerNot yet recruitingNCT07103551Phase 3
• The Accuracy of Computer Software Prediction of Soft Tissue Profile for Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic TreatmentRecruitingNCT05978856
• A Comparative Study Between Modified Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expander And Modified Rapid Palatal Expander in Molar Distalization Using Cone- Beam Computed TomographyActive, not recruitingNCT07038902Not applicable
• Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct AnthropometryCompletedNCT06897852
• Evaluation of the Hybrid Rapid Maxillary Expander Assisted With Micro-osteo Perforation (MOPs) in Adult.CompletedNCT06467240
• Evaluation of Dental and Skeletal Effect of TPA and Nance as a Space Maintainers in Children: A Prospective Clinical TrialActive, not recruitingNCT05896618Not applicable
• TADs Anchored vs Conventional Anchored Carriere Motion ApplianceCompletedNCT05631353Not applicable
• Ethically Accepted With Code 851/2971 A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator Versus Andresen ActivatorStatus unknownNCT05604625Not applicable
• Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical StudyCompletedNCT05555719Not applicable
• Effect of Skeletally Anchored Reversed PowerScope Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment of Patients With Class III MalocclusionStatus unknownNCT05475548Not applicable
• the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid OneCompletedNCT05466344Phase 2/3
• Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy During Maxillary Molar Distalization Using a Skeletally Anchored ApplianceStatus unknownNCT05465473Not applicable
• the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional ApplianceCompletedNCT05440526Phase 2/3
• Effects of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Expander Via Two Approaches of MicroosteoperforationsStatus unknownNCT05433038Not applicable
• Tow Maxillary Hybrid Expanders Screw Supported Versus Lateral Angulated One; a Prospective Randomized Clinical StudyStatus unknownNCT05193513Not applicable
• Distalization Via Skeletally-anchored Distaljet Appliance With Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforationsStatus unknownNCT05171738Not applicable
• Effect of Upper Third Molar Extraction on Distalization Carriere Motion Appliance :A Prospective Clinical StudyStatus unknownNCT05166928Not applicable
• 3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 MalocclusionCompletedNCT04972084Not applicable
• Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine RetractionCompletedNCT04868721Not applicable
• Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal PeriodsCompletedNCT04518865Not applicable
• Effect of Low Level Laser on Orthodontic Canine RetractionCompletedNCT04381442Not applicable
• Three Levels of Force Application for Maxillary ProtractionCompletedNCT04310267Not applicable