ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07936435Updated Nov 13, 2026

SPENG Block Versus Superior Trunk Block for Shoulder Surgery: Effects on Diaphragmatic Function, Mechanical Power, Nociception, and Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of SPENG Block and Superior Trunk Block in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery, Upper Extremity and Humerus Fractures, sponsored by Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-13.

Sponsored by Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Shoulder and upper extremity surgery causes severe postoperative pain. The interscalene brachial plexus block is the standard regional analgesia technique, but it causes ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) in almost all patients because of its proximity to the phrenic nerve. This can lead to dyspnea, hypoxemia, and atelectasis, especially in obese, elderly, or respiratory-compromised patients. The superior trunk block (STB) has been proposed as a phrenic-sparing alternative, yet HDP still occurs in about 70-76% of patients.

The Shoulder Posterior Pericapsular Nerve Group (SPENG) block is a novel pericapsular technique that targets the articular branches of the suprascapular and axillary nerves with a single injection posterior to the scapula, far from the brachial plexus and phrenic nerve. No randomized controlled trial has yet compared the SPENG block with the STB.

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare preoperative ultrasound-guided SPENG block and STB in adult patients undergoing elective shoulder and upper extremity surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome is the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, assessed by M-mode ultrasound measurement of diaphragmatic excursion in the post-anesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative mechanical power and respiratory mechanics, intraoperative nociception (qNOX) and additional opioid requirement, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and rescue analgesic consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, and patient satisfaction.

The investigators hypothesize that the SPENG block will significantly reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis compared with the STB while providing similar analgesic quality during the first 24 postoperative hours.

Read the detailed description

Rationale

After superior trunk block (STB), hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) has been reported in 76.3% of patients (Kang et al., Anesthesiology 2019) and in 70.8% of patients with 20 mL of local anesthetic (Lee et al., Pain Physician 2021). Even after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block, the reported HDP incidence is 59.5% (Ferré et al., 2019). These data suggest that all approaches at the level of the brachial plexus carry a substantial risk of phrenic nerve involvement. The SPENG block (Kilicaslan et al., Pain Med 2026) targets the articular branches of the suprascapular and axillary nerves, which provide approximately 70% of the sensory innervation of the shoulder joint, at a site posterior to the scapula. M-mode ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic excursion is a non-invasive, repeatable, and objective bedside method for detecting block-related HDP.

Randomization and Blinding Procedures

The allocation sequence will be generated by computer (www.random.org) and concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Each envelope will be opened immediately before the block by the anesthesiologist performing it, who will not be involved in data collection. To maintain blinding, identical sterile dressings will be applied to both the supraclavicular region and the posterior shoulder in all patients. All block procedures will be performed with real-time needle-tip visualization, in 5 mL increments with aspiration before each increment. Lipid emulsion (20%) and resuscitation equipment will be available.

Standardized Perioperative Management

Standard monitoring will be applied in all patients. IV midazolam 1-2 mg may be given after baseline diaphragm measurement. Anesthesia will be induced with propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg, fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and maintained with sevoflurane titrated to a qCON of 40-60. Fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg will be administered if qNOX remains above 60 for more than 1 minute. All patients will receive IV paracetamol 1 g and ondansetron 4 mg 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Ventilation will be standardized in volume-controlled mode (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight, PEEP 5 cmH₂O, FiO₂ 50%, respiratory rate adjusted to EtCO₂ 35-40 mmHg). Plateau pressure will be measured with a 0.5-second inspiratory pause, and mechanical power will be calculated with the simplified Gattinoni formula: MP (J/min) = 0.098 × RR × VT (L) × [Ppeak - ½ × (Pplat - PEEP)]. Postoperative analgesia will consist of IV paracetamol 1 g every 6 hours and IV dexketoprofen 50 mg every 12 hours unless contraindicated, with IV tramadol 1 mg/kg (maximum 400 mg/24 h) as rescue analgesia.

Diaphragm Ultrasound Technique

The ipsilateral hemidiaphragm will be imaged in the supine position with a 2-5 MHz convex probe using a subcostal approach along the anterior axillary/midclavicular line (liver window on the right, spleen window on the left). Excursion will be measured three times in M-mode during each maneuver, and the mean value will be recorded. The postoperative measurement will be performed when the patient is fully awake and cooperative (Modified Aldrete score ≥9), using the same position, probe placement, and maneuvers, by the same blinded assessor.

Sample Size and Statistical Analysis

Sample size was calculated with G*Power 3.1.9.7 based on the primary outcome. Assuming an HDP incidence of 70% with STB and a conservatively estimated 30% with SPENG, 31 patients per group are required (two-sided α = 0.05, power = 90%). Allowing for an anticipated 15% loss, 36 patients will be enrolled per group. This sample size is also sufficient to detect a 1.5-point (SD 2.0) difference in VAS scores with 80% power. Data will be analyzed with SPSS v26.0. Relative risk with 95% confidence interval will be reported for the primary outcome. Repeated measures ANOVA or linear mixed-effects models will be used for time-dependent variables, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test for time to first rescue analgesic. Analyses will follow a modified intention-to-treat approach, and p \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery
  • Upper Extremity
  • Humerus Fractures

Keywords

  • Brachial Plexus Block
  • Diaphragm
  • Pain
  • Postoperative Shoulder Joint
  • Nociception
03

In context

Humeral Fractures

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Humeral Fractures; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 56 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Humeral Fractures.

Browse Humeral Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective arthroscopic or open shoulder/upper extremity surgery under general anesthesia
  • Ipsilateral hemidiaphragm clearly visualized with M-mode ultrasound at baseline assessment
  • Signed written informed consen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to regional anesthesia: local infection at the injection site, coagulopathy, or anticoagulant therapy ( >1.5, count \<100,000/mm3)
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Known ipsilateral or contralateral diaphragmatic paralysis/dysfunction or history of phrenic nerve injury
  • Severe respiratory disease ( with mMRC dyspnea scale ≥2, restrictive lung disease, home oxygen requirement) or baseline room-air SpO2 \<94%
  • ≥35 kg/m2
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit or brachial plexopathy in the operative extremity
  • Regular opioid use for chronic pain within the past 3 months
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Neurological or psychiatric disease preventing cooperation or understanding of the VAS scale, or refusal to give consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SPENG Block

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided Shoulder Posterior Pericapsular Nerve Group (SPENG) block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine before induction of general anesthesia.

    Procedure: SPENG Block

  • Active comparator
    Superior Trunk Block

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided superior trunk block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine before induction of general anesthesia.

    Procedure: Superior Trunk Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureSPENG Block

    With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, a linear probe is placed transversely just inferior to the posterior acromion. Using an in-plane medial-to-lateral approach, the needle tip is positioned between the posterior glenoid rim and the deep surface of the infraspinatus muscle, and 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected as a single injection.

  • ProcedureSuperior Trunk Block

    With the patient supine and the head turned to the contralateral side, the superior trunk is identified at the level just proximal to the origin of the suprascapular nerve. Using an in-plane lateral-to-medial approach, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected, half anterior and half posterior to the superior trunk.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis

    Ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion will be measured with M-mode ultrasound during the sniff maneuver (mean of three measurements). Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis is defined as a ≥25% reduction in excursion from baseline and graded as none (\<25%), partial (25-75%), or complete (\>75% reduction or paradoxical movement).

    Time frame: Baseline (before block) and approximately 30 minutes after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Diaphragmatic Excursion

    Percentage change in ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion (mm) measured with M-mode ultrasound during quiet breathing, deep inspiration, and sniff maneuver, calculated as ((T0 - T1) / T0) × 100.

    Time frame: Baseline (before block) and approximately 30 minutes after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit

  2. Intraoperative Mechanical Power

    Mechanical power (J/min) calculated with the simplified Gattinoni formula: 0.098 × RR × VT (L) × \[Ppeak - ½ × (Pplat - PEEP)\].

    Time frame: 10 minutes after intubation, after surgical positioning, at 30 and 60 minutes of surgery, and at the end of surgery

  3. Intraoperative Driving Pressure and Static Compliance

    Driving pressure (Pplat - PEEP, cmH2O) and static compliance (VT / \[Pplat - PEEP\], mL/cmH2O).

    Time frame: 10 minutes after intubation, after surgical positioning, at 30 and 60 minutes of surgery, and at the end of surgery

  4. Intraoperative Nociception (qNOX)

    qNOX values recorded with the Conox monitor and the percentage of anesthesia time with qNOX \>60.

    Time frame: Before induction, at intubation, surgical positioning, skin incision/first portal entry, every 15 minutes during surgery, and at the end of surgery

  5. Intraoperative Supplemental Fentanyl Consumption

    Total supplemental fentanyl (µg) and number of supplemental doses administered for qNOX \>60 lasting longer than 1 minute.

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

  6. Postoperative Pain Scores

    Pain assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at rest at all time points, and additionally during movement at 24 hours.

    Time frame: On arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit, at 30 minutes, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively

  7. Time to First Rescue Analgesic

    Time (minutes) from the end of surgery to the first administration of rescue tramadol for VAS ≥4.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

  8. Total Rescue Tramadol Consumption

    Total intravenous tramadol (mg) administered as rescue analgesia.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

  9. Patient Satisfaction

    Assessed with a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

  10. Incidence of Block-Related Adverse Events

    Horner syndrome, hoarseness, vascular puncture, signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, postoperative nausea and vomiting, paresthesia, dyspnea, and need for supplemental oxygen.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

Other outcomes

  1. Block Performance Time

    Total time (minutes) for ultrasound imaging and needling.

    Time frame: During block procedure

  2. Motor Block of the Shoulder

    Shoulder abduction (axillary nerve) and external rotation (suprascapular nerve) strength assessed with a 3-point scale (2 = normal strength, 1 = reduced strength, 0 = no movement against gravity).

    Time frame: 20 minutes after block

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital
    Bursa, Bursa 16310, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Nurullah Damla, MD · Contactnurullahdamla@hotmail.com · +905075482122
    • Korgün Ökmen, MD · Principal investigator
    • Kamer Kılınç, MD · Sub investigator
    • Nurullah Damla, MD · Sub investigator
    • Furkan Sakın, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lentz B, Kharasch S, Goldsmith AJ, Brown J, Duggan NM, Nagdev A. Diaphragmatic Excursion as a Novel Objective Measure of Serratus Anterior Plane Block Efficacy: A Case Series. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;6(4):276-279. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2022.7.57457. PubMed 36427038 ↗
  • Ferre F, Mastantuono JM, Martin C, Ferrier A, Marty P, Laumonerie P, Bonnevialle N, Minville V. [Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: a prospective cohort study]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;69(6):580-586. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 30. PubMed 31796298 ↗
  • Lee MG, Shin YJ, You HS, Lim CH, Chang YJ, Shin HJ. A Comparison of Anesthetic Quality Between Interscalene Block and Superior Trunk Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician. 2021 May;24(3):235-242. PubMed 33988942 ↗
  • Jo Y, Oh C, Lee WY, Lee D, Shin S, Chung W, Lim C, Lee SY, Hong B. Diaphragm-sparing efficacy of subparaneural upper trunk block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Oct 1;41(10):760-768. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002034. Epub 2024 Jul 3. PubMed 38961806 ↗
  • Kang R, Jeong JS, Chin KJ, Yoo JC, Lee JH, Choi SJ, Gwak MS, Hahm TS, Ko JS. Superior Trunk Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia Compared with Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019 Dec;131(6):1316-1326. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002919. PubMed 31490292 ↗
  • Kilicaslan A, Kekec AF, Erdem TE, Kilic G, Aycan IO, Arici AG, Koc MN, Sobay K, Dayanan AR, Sindel M, Ozer M. Shoulder Posterior Pericapsular Nerve Group (SPENG) Block: A Novel Posterior Pericapsular Technique for Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Blockade. Pain Med. 2026 Jul 27:pnag098. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnag098. Online ahead of print. No abstract available. PubMed 42505086 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared, as the informed consent form does not include permission for data sharing and the Turkish Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK) restricts the disclosure of personal health data. Aggregated results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 9 months later.

Of 26 interventional studies with no phase under Humeral Fractures, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2026
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07936435
Lead sponsor
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Nurullah Damla (Research Assistant, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 13, 2026

Study contacts

Nurullah Damla, MD
Contact
nurullahdamla@hotmail.com
+905075482122
Korgün Ökmen
principal investigator · University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion