ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07929649Updated Nov 10, 2026

IPOS-Liver Validation Study

An observational study in Advanced Chronic Liver Disease, Palliative Care and Patient Reported Outcome Measurements, sponsored by University of Hull. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by University of Hull · Observational

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
71
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People with advanced liver disease often experience complex physical symptoms, emotional concerns, and practical difficulties, especially as their illness progresses. Currently, there are no questionnaires designed specifically to capture these needs and experiences. A purposely designed questionnaire could help healthcare professionals better understand patients' needs and improve the care they receive. The questionnaire must be tested to make sure that it is reliable, accurate and acceptable to patients. This process is known as validation.

This study is testing a new questionnaire called the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale- Liver (IPOS-Liver). It asks about symptoms and concerns experienced by people living with advanced liver disease.

The study will take place in two NHS hospitals in England. 71 NHS patients with advanced chronic liver disease will take part, together with healthcare professionals involved in their care. Patients and healthcare professionals will be asked to complete the IPOS-Liver questionnaire alongside other established questionnaires. These will be completed at two time points a few days apart. The results will be statistically analysed to see whether the new questionnaire gives consistent and useful results. A small number of patients will additionally be invited to take part in a 30-minute interview about their experience of completing the IPOS-Liver. Adult NHS patients in England will be invited to take part after the clinician caring for them identifies that they are eligible for the study.

Read the detailed description

This multi location, longitudinal, observational mixed methods study will evaluate the psychometric properties of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale-Liver (IPOS Liver). The IPOS Liver is a newly developed patient reported outcome measure within the IPOS family, designed to capture symptoms, concerns, and unmet palliative care needs specific to people with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Existing outcome measures do not fully reflect the unique palliative symptoms experienced by this population.

The IPOS Liver was developed in collaboration with a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group and an expert panel comprising hepatology and palliative care clinicians. This study will assess the measure's psychometric properties in 71 adults with ACLD receiving care in hospitals, hospices, or outpatient settings across England using a consecutive eligibility sampling strategy.

Validity and reliability will be examined through correlations between IPOS Liver scores and established clinical outcome measures, assessment of change in IPOS Liver scores over two time points, and evaluation of whether IPOS-Liver score changes correspond with clinical change. In addition, the views and experiences of using the IPOS Liver will be explored through qualitative interviews with a purposively sampled subgroup of patients and healthcare professionals to further support content validity.

The study will be conducted in two locations in England and will be supported by clinicians affiliated with the British Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL) Palliative Hepatology Specialist Interest Group. Ethical safeguards including on-going capacity assessments to ensure decision-specific consent and the right to withdraw with full data deletion, will protect vulnerable participants. Findings from this 18 month study will determine whether the IPOS Liver is a reliable and valid outcome measure suitable for use in clinical practice and research involving people with ACLD

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
  • Palliative Care
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measurements

Keywords

  • Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
  • Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)
  • Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale - Liver (IPOS-Liver)
  • Palliative care
  • End of Life Care
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • End Stage Liver Disease
03

In context

End Stage Liver Disease

154 studies on the registry are indexed under End Stage Liver Disease; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 71 is below the median of 200 across 55 observational studies indexed under End Stage Liver Disease.

Browse End Stage Liver Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Hull is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients at participating locations.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Live in England
  • Have capacity to give written to participate in the study, as judged by the clinical team
  • The patient is able to communicate and understand English adequately to complete the IPOS-Liver and provide informed consent (NHS translation services and reading of research documents will be used to support participation for those with limited English or literacy when feasible)
  • Have a diagnosis of ACLD from any underlying aetiology, with at least one of the following clinical scores:

    • B9
    • UKELD 49
    • BCLC stage C
  • Is expected to be reviewed on two occasions within 5 days as an inpatient, or is being cared for as an outpatient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without capacity to consent as judged by the clinical team
  • Patients currently too symptomatic or distressed to participate, as judged by the clinical team
  • Patients unable to understand written and verbal communication in English

Staff members caring for patients will also become participants in the study.

Staff-participant inclusion criteria are:

  • Be a healthcare professional involved with the care of a participant enrolled in the study
  • Have authorised access to the participant's medical notes
  • Give consent to be involved in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
71 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Construct Validity

    Construct validity establishes the theoretical relationship between variables on the new IPOS-Liver and those on established measures of the same construct and scores between sub-groups of participants (DeVellis \& Thorpe, 2022). This will be established by exploring convergent and divergent validity as well as known group comparisons.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Internal consistency

    Internal consistency reflects how closely items on the IPOS-Liver are related, or measure the same underlying construct.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

  2. Inter-rater reliability

    Inter-rater reliability is the degree of agreement between different raters using the IPOS-Liver.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

  3. Content and face validity

    The extent to which items reflect the construct being measured.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

  4. Floor and ceiling effects

    The percentage of participants (staff or patients) who have either maximum or minimum IPOS-Liver scores will be calculated.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Participants will be informed that only anonymised data may be shared with other researchers (i.e. the data set will be shared, but the consent forms linking the name and study identification number will not be shared), this will be facilitated through depositing the data in the University of Hull's Repository.

Supporting information: Analytic code

Time frame: From completion of the study (2028-2029) for 5 years.

Access criteria: Ethically-approved academic and medical research projects in the UK and European Union that have an adequacy decision in place, equivalent data security measures and valid data sharing contracts (in accordance with UK GDPR) will be able to access the fully-anonymised data set.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Apr 2028, 16 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 4, 2026
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07929649
Lead sponsor
University of Hull
Collaborators
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 5, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion