ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07929129Updated Nov 10, 2026

ESCAPE ROOM FOR PARAMEDIC STUDENTS

An interventional study of Escape room activity in EMT-Paramedic, Paramedical Professionals and Education, sponsored by Çankırı Karatekin University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Çankırı Karatekin University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2025, registered Nov 2026).
Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Escape rooms are an entertainment activity that typically involves a team of two or more people. They utilise themes, narratives and various puzzles to challenge participants to find clues and solve problems within a set timeframe. This study was conducted to determine the impact of an escape room-based approach on paramedic students' knowledge and perceived professional competence in managing burn injuries during training. The study was designed as a randomised controlled trial. It was carried out during the 2024-25 academic year with second-year students enrolled on the "Emergency Response in Unusual Situations" course on the Paramedic (First and Emergency Aid) programme at a health services vocational school in Turkey. A total population sampling method was employed, meaning no specific sample selection process was used. Randomisation was stratified by the students' respective academic tracks: those in the evening programme formed the intervention group (n = 33), while those in the daytime programme formed the control group (n = 36). Data were collected after a theoretical lecture using a personal information form, a knowledge test and the "Emergency Medical Technician Professional Competence Perception Scale" (administered as a pre-test). Two weeks after the theoretical instruction, an "Emergency Intervention" escape room simulation focused on burn care and emergency response was conducted in a laboratory setting for the intervention group. Participants were organised into three-person teams and guided through specific scenarios. No such activity was implemented for the control group. Both groups then completed the knowledge test and the "Emergency Medical Technician Professional Competence Perception Scale" as a post-test. The analysis of the data used descriptive statistical methods, the independent samples t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, the paired samples t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Read the detailed description

Study procedure:

  • Data were collected from second-year students enrolled in the regular and evening programmes of the Paramedic (First and Emergency Aid) Programme at the Vocational School of Health Services during the spring semester of the 2024-25 academic year. These students were taking the "Emergency Response in Unusual Situations" course. Data collection took place in person at the department's skills laboratory, two weeks before the final examinations.
  • Students enrolled in the "Emergency Response in Unusual Situations" course, including those in the regular programme and the evening (second-shift) programme, attend classes in separate sections. For this reason, the randomisation process for the study was stratified by these sections using random.org: students in the evening programme were assigned to the intervention group and those in the regular programme to the control group.
  • Before the study began, the students were informed about the research and the "escape room" technique was introduced. Written informed consent was then obtained from them. The primary researcher then delivered a lecture on burns and emergency response to both the intervention and control groups. This four-hour session was conducted on the same day for both groups, albeit at different times (morning for the control group and afternoon for the intervention group), in a classroom setting. Subsequently, students in both groups were given a Personal Information Form, a Knowledge Test and the "Emergency Medical Technician Professional Competence Perception Scale" (EMT-PCPS) as a pre-test.
  • Two weeks after the lecture, the control group took a post-test comprising a knowledge test and the EMT-PCPS. The intervention group participated in an 'escape room' simulation activity centred on a burns and emergency response scenario in a laboratory setting.
  • Once all the necessary laboratory equipment and puzzles had been set up, the teams were admitted to the laboratory one by one. The laboratory door was locked once a team entered. Once they had completed the escape room activity, the team was given a key to unlock the door. A stopwatch was started when the 'Emergency Intervention' instruction was followed and stopped when the exit door was opened. The students were expected to follow the instructions provided to complete all the puzzles in the escape room, solve the questions to uncover codes and riddles, finish the scenario and prepare to intervene in a trauma situation using the acquired equipment. Finally, they had to exit the room.
  • Once all the students in the intervention group had completed the escape room activity, they took the Knowledge Test and the EMT-PCPS as post-tests.
02

Conditions studied

  • EMT-Paramedic
  • Paramedical Professionals
  • Education

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Burns
  • education
  • escape room
  • gamification
  • perception
  • professional competence
  • EMT-Paramedic
03

In context

Burns

905 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 69 is above the median of 40 across 663 interventional studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

Çankırı Karatekin University is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willingness to participate in the research
  • Being enrolled on the 'Emergency Response in Unusual Situations' course.
  • Participating in training on burns and emergency response.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to participate in training on burns and emergency response
  • Failing to complete the data collection instruments.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
69 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Escape Room

    During the implementation phase of the study, knowledge tests and professional competence perception scales were administered as pre- and post-tests. Students in the intervention group were presented with scenarios and puzzles focusing on burns and emergency interventions in the form of an 'escape room' activity.

    Behavioral: Escape room activity

  • No intervention
    Control

    During the implementation phase of the study, knowledge tests and professional competence perception scales were administered as pre- and post-tests.

Interventions

  • BehavioralEscape room activity

    As part of an escape room activity, students in the intervention group were presented with scenarios and puzzles designed around burns and emergency response.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences of knowledge scores between groups

    The researchers developed a 'Knowledge Test' to assess knowledge levels, which was administered as both a pre-test and a post-test. The test consisted of ten questions and was scored out of 100. The scores obtained at the two time points were then compared. A higher post-test score compared to the pre-test score indicates an increase in knowledge.

    Time frame: To assess knowledge levels among paramedic students, a pre-test was administered in the first week, followed by a post-test two weeks later. Total duration: Three weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in perceived professional competence scores among groups

    Pre- and post-tests were administered to measure the professional competence perception levels of paramedic students. The EMT-PCPS (Professional Competence Perception Scale for Paramedic Students) is an assessment tool that explores the professional competence perceptions of final-year students on the First Aid and Emergency Response Programme. It helps to identify educational needs and develop strategies to enhance student success and facilitate learning throughout the instructional process. The scale consists of four factors (subscales) and 65 items. Scores can be obtained for each individual in terms of both total and subscale scores; higher scores reflect a commendable level of professional competence perception. Test scores obtained at two different time points were compared. The higher post-test scores indicate an increase in the students' perception of their professional competence.

    Time frame: To assess the perception levels of professional competence among paramedic students, a pre-test was administered in the first week, followed by a post-test two weeks later. Total duration: Three weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Çankırı Karatekin University
    Çankırı, 18200, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gomez-Urquiza JL, Requena-Palomares I, Gorjon-Peramato E, Gomez-Salgado J, Canadas-De la Fuente GA, Albendin-Garcia L. Emergency and critical care professionals' opinion on escape room as a health sciences evaluation game: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 24;101(25):e29432. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029432. PubMed 35758377 ↗
  • •Colthup, R., & Ross, A.L. (2024). Classroom to escape room: An innovative experience to prepare and test students. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 16 (1):26-34. DOI:10.12968/jpar.2024.16.1.26
  • •Thompson, J., & Verrall, C. (2025). The use of escape rooms to enhance paramedic resuscitation training. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 18(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2025.0033
  • Hakyemez, F., & Katı, C. (2024). Emergency medical technician professional competence perception scale: Validity and reliability study. Genel Tıp Derg. 34(3):276-282. DOI: 10.54005/geneltip.1307055

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — in progress

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07929129
Lead sponsor
Çankırı Karatekin University
Responsible party
Müjgan ONARICI (Asst. Prof., Çankırı Karatekin University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Apr 22, 2025
Primary completion
May 6, 2025
Completion
May 27, 2025
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Müjgan ONARICI, PhD
principal investigator · Çankırı Karatekin University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion