ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07927413Updated Nov 10, 2026

Effectiveness and Safety of TachoSil® Fibrin Sealant Patch for Supporting Dural Sealing Among Adult Inpatients

An observational study in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Leak and Psuedomeningocele, sponsored by Corza Medical GmbH. Recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Corza Medical GmbH · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
600
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This retrospective observational cohort study compares the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive TachoSil® fibrin sealant patch with DuraSeal® hydrogel sealant for supporting dural sealing in adult patients undergoing cranial or spinal surgery at participating United States hospitals. Medical records will be reviewed to assess clinically evident cerebrospinal fluid leak or clinically evident pseudomeningocele within 90 days after surgery. The study will use 1:1 propensity score matching to evaluate whether TachoSil® is non-inferior to DuraSeal® and will assess additional effectiveness and safety outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Leak
  • Psuedomeningocele

Keywords

  • TachoSil®
  • DuraSeal® sealant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Corza Medical GmbH is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All adult patients who were admitted to one of the target hospitals for a neurological surgery and discharged from January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2026 (index period) and had use of TachoSil® or DuraSeal® sealants during the neurological surgery (index surgery) as dural sealant and met the study selection criteria will be included in this study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥ 18 years
  • Had an inpatient encounter to select sites with a cranial or spinal neurological surgery that involves dural sealing performed and discharged during January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2026
  • Had use of TachoSil® or DuraSeal® sealants during the cranial or spinal neurological surgery as supportive dural sealing method

Note: Any surgery meeting the above criteria is considered index surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Index surgery was trauma-related
  • Had an infection within 7 days prior to index date
  • Had any neurosurgery involving dural opening during the 12-month look-back period
  • Had neoplasm of dura mater/meningioma, requiring resection of dura during index visit (the earliest visit meeting selection criteria) or 12-month look-back period
  • Was pregnant at index visit
  • Had a CSF leak during the 12-month look-back period
  • If the surgical approach was transbasal or transpetrosal, if the arachnoid membrane and CSF- containing system remained intact, or if there was >1 dura opening (excluding extra ventricular or lumbar drains) during index surgery
  • Had use of Evarrest patch, Tisseel, Adherus, CraniSeal, Duragen, fibrin glue or other dural sealing products during index surgery
  • Had radiation therapy to surgical field in the 3 months prior to index date
  • Had chronic use in the 3 months prior to index date
  • Had both TachoSil® and DuraSeal® used for dural closure during index neurological surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • TachoSil®

    Adult inpatients who underwent neurological surgery with the use of TachoSil® for dural sealing support and were discharged from US hospitals from 01 January 2017 through 31 March 2026

    Drug: TachoSil®

  • DuraSeal®

    Adult inpatients who underwent neurological surgery with the use of DuraSeal® for dural sealing support and were discharged from US hospitals from 01 January 2017 through 31 March 2026

    Device: DuraSeal®

Interventions

  • TachoSil® is an absorbable fibrin sealant patch consisting of equine collagen coated with human fibrinogen and thrombin.

  • DeviceDuraSeal®

    DuraSeal® sealants are polyethylene glycol (PEG) based hydrogel.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Risk of Clinically Evident CSF Leak or Clinically Evident Pseudomeningocele

    A clinically evident CSF leak is defined as clear fluid leaking through the surgical incision or orifice verified by a glucose concentration test or β-2 transferrin test. A clinically evident pseudomeningocele is defined as a subcutaneous visible and/or palpable fluid accumulation adjacent to or at the site of surgical incision suspected to be CSF. If there is not a collection of CSF/pseudomeningocele, or active leak that can be sampled for β-2 transferrin test, but the participant had symptoms consistent with intracranial hypotension and/or an ex vacuo type subdural hematoma, the participant will be considered as having clinically evident CSF leak or pseudomeningocele.

    Time frame: Within 90 days post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Risk of Non-clinically Evident Pseudomeningocele Without Occurrence of the Primary Endpoint

    Non-clinically evident pseudomeningocele is defined as CSF accumulation detected only by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.

    Time frame: Within 90 days post surgery

  2. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)

    AEs refer to any undesirable event that is documented in a site's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) for an eligible participant as occurring within 90 days of the index surgery regardless of whether or not the events were considered causally related to TachoSil® or DuraSeal® use. SAEs refer to any AE documented in a site's EMR for an eligible patient that results in any of the following outcomes: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Individual prespecified AEs and the composite categories of any expected AE and any unexpected AE will be summarized by treatment cohort.

    Time frame: Within 90 days post surgery

  3. Risk of Clinically Evident CSF Leak

    A clinically evident CSF leak is defined as clear fluid leaking through the surgical incision or orifice verified by a glucose concentration test or β-2 transferrin test.

    Time frame: Within 90 days post surgery

  4. Risk of Clinically Evident Pseudomeningocele

    A clinically evident pseudomeningocele is defined as a subcutaneous visible and/or palpable fluid accumulation adjacent to or at the site of surgical incision suspected to be CSF.

    Time frame: Within 90 days post surgery

07

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    Recruiting
    • Daniel Lubelski, MD · Principal investigator
  • Columbia University
    New York, New York 10032, United States
    Recruiting
    • Raymond F. Sekula, MD · Principal investigator
  • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, United States
    Recruiting
    • Norberto Andaluz, MD, MBA, MHA, FACS · Principal investigator
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
    Recruiting
    • James S. Harrop, MD, MSHQS, FACS · Principal investigator
  • Alleghany Health Network
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, United States
    Recruiting
    • Alexander Yu, MD · Principal investigator
  • Swedish Health Services
    Seattle, Washington 98122, United States
    Recruiting
    • Zachary N. Litvack, MD MBA FAANS FACS · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07927413
Lead sponsor
Corza Medical GmbH
Collaborators
Comprehensive Information and Analytics Services (CIAS), Premier, Inc. Applied Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Feb 13, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 16, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 16, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jeff Wilson
Contact
Jeff.Wilson@corza.com
416-578-9058
Michele Young
Contact
Michele.young@corza.com
1 689-316-8809
Ning Rosenthal, MD, PhD, MPH,
principal investigator · Premier Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion