ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07925411PENGUpdated Nov 9, 2026

Bilateral PENG Block for Total Vaginal Hysterectomy

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of PENG Block in Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) and Total Vaginal Hysterectomy, sponsored by University of Illinois Chicago. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by University of Illinois Chicago · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective, single-arm pilot study will evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary analgesic outcomes of bilateral pericapsular nerve group (PENG) blocks in adult patients undergoing total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) under general anesthesia at UI Health. The study will target 25 evaluable subjects, with enrollment of up to 30 subjects to account for withdrawal or incomplete data. Following induction of general anesthesia, subjects will receive ultrasound-guided bilateral PENG blocks using 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine per side, in addition to standard perioperative analgesic management. Outcomes will include postoperative pain scores, perioperative analgesic requirements, motor weakness and ambulation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, PACU recovery and discharge, and adverse events. Data from this pilot study will be used to characterize the feasibility and safety of the intervention and to inform the design of a future controlled study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block)
  • Total Vaginal Hysterectomy

Keywords

  • Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block)
  • Total Vaginal Hysterectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois Chicago is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 years or older
  2. Scheduled to undergo elective total vaginal hysterectomy under general anesthesia
  3. Planned postoperative recovery in the PACU
  4. Able to provide written
  5. Able to understand and report postoperative pain using the NRS (0-10)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Known allergy or to the local anesthetic selected for the PENG block or to other amide local anesthetics

2. Infection, cellulitis, open wound, or other active skin or soft-tissue infection at or near the proposed block site

3. Known coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, or anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy that, according to institutional guidelines or the judgment of the treating anesthesiologist, would increase the risk associated with performance of the PENG block

4. Pre-existing clinically significant lower-extremity neurologic or motor deficit that may increase the risk associated with the block or interfere with postoperative assessment of motor or neurologic adverse events

5. Anatomical abnormality, prior surgery involving the proposed block region, or other condition that, in the judgment of the treating anesthesiologist, would prevent adequate visualization of relevant anatomy or safe performance of the PENG block

6. Any medical condition or clinical circumstance that, in the judgment of the treating anesthesiologist or investigator, would increase the risk associated with bilateral PENG block or administration of the study local anesthetic

7. Planned neuraxial anesthesia or another regional anesthetic technique expected to provide perioperative analgesia and interfere with assessment of the study intervention

8. Receipt or planned receipt of additional local anesthetic that would result in a total local anesthetic dose considered unsafe by the treating anesthesiologist

9. Inability to reliably communicate postoperative pain using the NRS

10. Pregnancy

11. Prisoner status

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PENG Block

    Following induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgical positioning, participants will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided PENG blocks

    Procedure: PENG Block

Interventions

  • ProcedurePENG Block

    After negative aspiration and confirmation of appropriate needle position, 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be administered on each side, for a total volume of 40 mL and a total ropivacaine dose of 80 mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity during the PACU stay

    Assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at PACU arrival (once awake and able to provide a reliable assessment).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants requiring rescue opioid analgesia during the PACU stay

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

  2. Location of postoperative pain

    Self-reported by the participant at each PACU assessment and categorized as deep pelvic/vaginal, perineal/introital, suprapubic, groin/hip, medial thigh, or lower back pain

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

  3. Cutaneous sensory block, at each PACU pain-assessment timepoint

    assessed bilaterally in the femoral, saphenous, obturator, lateral femoral cutaneous, genitofemoral (femoral branch), and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric territories using a 3-point scale

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

  4. Correspondence between the anatomical territories in which sensory block is demonstrated and the anatomical location of reported postoperative pain

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

  5. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting during the PACU stay

    Time frame: Any time during PACU stay

  6. Duration of PACU stay

    Time frame: PACU Stay

Other outcomes

  1. Lower-extremity motor weakness following bilateral PENG block, a

    Assessed bilaterally by knee extension (quadriceps, femoral nerve) and hip adduction (adductors, obturator nerve) and graded using the Medical Research Council (MRC) 0-5 scale, referenced to the participant's own preoperative baseline examination

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

  2. Persistence of sensory or motor block at PACU discharge

    Defined as any territory scored as reduced or absent, or any MRC grade below the participant's preoperative baseline, at the final PACU assessment

    Time frame: PACU discharge

  3. Falls or near-falls

    Time frame: The postoperative observation period in PACU

  4. Signs or symptoms of local anesthetic systemic toxicity

    Cardiovascular System Symptoms * Early or Moderate Signs: * Blood pressure changes (initial hypertension or rapid tachycardia, progressing to low blood pressure/hypotension) * Slow heart rate (bradycardia) or heart rhythm irregularities (arrhythmias) * Conduction delays and heart blocks * Severe / Life-Threatening Signs: * Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation * Cardiac arrest, asystole, or pulseless electrical activity (PEA

    Time frame: Starting from the block time until 30 min after the block

  5. New lower-extremity sensory or neurological symptoms following the block

    Weakness in lower-extremity and numbness

    Time frame: 30 minutes after PACU arrival, 60 minutes after PACU arrival, and at PACU discharge

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Huang Y, Lu Y, Wang J, Lu Q, Bao HF, Liu L, Dong CS. Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Different Concentrations and Volumes of Ropivacaine on Functional Recovery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Controlled Trial. J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 14;17:677-685. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S445000. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38375406 ↗
  • Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Altintas HM, Tekin B, Sakul BU, Alici HA. A possible mechanism of motor blockade of high volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: A cadaveric study. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Nov;74:110407. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110407. Epub 2021 Jun 24. No abstract available. PubMed 34175637 ↗
  • Pai P, Amor D, Lai YH, Echevarria GC. Use and Clinical Relevancy of Pericapsular Nerve Block (PENG) in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2024 May 1;40(5):320-332. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001196. PubMed 38268183 ↗
  • Wegmann T. [Detection and treatment of rabies in humans]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1966 Jun 11;96(23):743-6. No abstract available. German. PubMed 6011222 ↗
  • Hin PC. Laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy in 26 patients: indications and outcome at 2 years. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996 Feb;6(1):25-8. doi: 10.1089/lps.1996.6.25. PubMed 8919174 ↗
  • Slopnick EA, Sears SB, Chapman GC, Sheyn DD, Abrams MK, Roberts KM, Pollard R, Mangel J. Pudendal Nerve Block Analgesia at the Time of Vaginal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Oct 1;29(10):827-835. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001351. Epub 2023 Apr 4. PubMed 37093572 ↗
  • Goidescu OC, Dogaru IA, Badea TG, Enyedi M, Enciu O, Gheoca Mutu DE, Filipoiu FM. The distribution of the inferior hypogastric plexus in female pelvis. J Med Life. 2022 Jun;15(6):784-791. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0145. PubMed 35928357 ↗
  • Hartmann F. [75th Anniversary of professor Dr. Rudolf Schoen]. Med Klin. 1967 Feb 24;62(8):314-6. No abstract available. German. PubMed 4870713 ↗
  • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 750: Perioperative Pathways: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):e120-e130. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002818. PubMed 30134426 ↗
  • Aurore V, Rothlisberger R, Boemke N, Hlushchuk R, Bangerter H, Bergmann M, Imboden S, Mueller MD, Eppler E, Djonov V. Anatomy of the female pelvic nerves: a macroscopic study of the hypogastric plexus and their relations and variations. J Anat. 2020 Sep;237(3):487-494. doi: 10.1111/joa.13206. Epub 2020 May 19. PubMed 32427364 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To avoid breeches of privacy and confidentiality

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07925411
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois Chicago
Responsible party
Stephan Cohn (Associate Professor of Clinical Anesthesia; Medical Director, Perioperative Services - Outpatient Surgery Center, University of Illinois Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Alexandra Barabanova, MS
Contact
barabano@uic.edu
312-355-5733
Kantarakorn Unchiti, MD PhD
Contact
Kantarakorn.u@gmail.com
Stephan Cohn, MD
principal investigator · University of Illinois Chicago

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion