An interventional study of continuous cryotherapy device and standard ice pack in Rotator Cuff, sponsored by Gianluca Caprili. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.
Sponsored by Gianluca Caprili · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
to assess the impact of a modern continuous cryotherapy device on pain intensity and postoperative analgesic consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Fifty patients treated with pre- and postoperative cryotherapy using a continuous cryotherapy device (case group) were compared with 43 control patients treated with standard ice packs postoperatively. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline (VAS 0), 20 days (VAS 20), and 90 days (VAS 90) postoperatively. Analgesic use during the first postoperative week was recorded. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and repeated-measures ANOVA.
This is the only study on the registry with Gianluca Caprili as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
modern continuous cryotherapy device
Device: continuous cryotherapy device
standard ice pack
Device: standard ice pack
continuous cryotherapy device applicated postoperatively, at baseline (0 days) 20 days, 90 days
standard ice pack applied
VAS score
VAS score (pain) at 0, 20 and 90 days postop, using a continuous cryotherapy device vs standard ice pack
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of treatment at 90 days
analgesic consumption
analgesic consumption at 0, 20 and 90 days postop, using a continuous cryotherapy device vs standard ice pack
Time frame: from enrollment to 90 days
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: Undecided — privacy concerning
Ran from Apr 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 12 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Agnosia