ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07921199Updated Nov 6, 2026

Sensory-integration Therapy Verses Augumented Reality-based Training in ASD

An interventional study of Augumented Reality-Based Training and Sensory-Integration Therapy in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Riphah International University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine and contrast the effects of Sensory Integration Therapy (SIT) and Augmented Reality-Based Training (AR) on gross motor skills, assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition (TGMD-3), in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. To assess the impact of Sensory Integration Therapy and Augmented Reality-Based Training on balance, measured using the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), and determine which intervention yields superior outcomes in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.To examine post-intervention Short Sensory Profile (SSP) scores between the two treatments groups following 8 weeks of intervention, in order to identify differential improvements in sensory processing. To determine changes in autism severity, using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), from baseline to post-intervention, and to analyze whether Sensory Integration Therapy or Augmented Reality Based Training results in greater improvement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
03

In context

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,724 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is below the median of 52 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,193 studies on the registry; 650 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 4-10 years.
  • Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder according to .
  • CARS (Childhood Autism Rating Scale) score of 30-36 (mild to moderate autism).
  • Able to follow simple verbal instructions and cooperate with assessment.
  • Parental/guardian written obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe visual or auditory impairment precluding participation in AR-based interventions.
  • Co-existing genetic syndromes (e.g., Down syndrome, Rett syndrome).
  • Orthopedic deformities or musculoskeletal conditions limiting movement.
  • History of recent surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Currently receiving any other structured motor or sensory rehabilitation program.
  • Seizure disorder or epilepsy not controlled by medications.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Augumented Reality-Based Training

    Other: Augumented Reality-Based Training

  • Active comparator
    Sensory-Integration Therapy

    Other: Sensory-Integration Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherAugumented Reality-Based Training

    The experimental will receive Augmented Reality (AR)-based training involving interactive virtual reaching, stepping, locomotor, and balance exercises with real-time visual and auditory feedback. In both groups, the intervention intensity and task complexity will be progressively increased throughout the 8-week program to optimize improvements in gross motor skills and balance.

  • OtherSensory-Integration Therapy

    Participants in both groups will receive supervised interventions 3 times per week for eight weeks (24 sessions), with each session lasting 45-60 minutes, including a 5-minute warm-up, 35-50 minutes of intervention, and a 5minute cool-down. The control group will receive conventional Sensory Integration-Therapy (SIT), comprising vestibular, tactile, gross motor, and balance activities with progressive therapist-guided difficulty over the period of 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition

    To compare the effects of sensory integration therapy and augmented reality-based training on gross motor skills using TGMD-3. According to the TGMD-3 scoring guidance, each performance criterion receives 0 or 1 point. The assessment includes 13 skills, with six locomotor skills and seven ball skills.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Pediatric Balance Scale

    14-item scale assessing static and dynamic balance. Measured at baseline and post-intervention.The PBS assesses functional balance in children through 14 tasks. Each task is scored from 0 to 4, giving a maximum total score of 56.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Short Sensory Profile

    The Short Sensory Profile (SSP) is a 38-item caregiver questionnaire used to identify sensory processing difficulties in children with ASD . Each item is scored from 1 to 5, giving a total score ranging from 38 to 190.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Childhood Autism Rating Scale

    The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) is used to assess autism-related behaviors and help determine the severity of autism-related characteristics.Each item is scored from 1 to 4, using half-point increments when appropriate. There are 15 items, so the total score ranges from 15 to 60.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Smart Start Academe SSA G-8 Markaz
    Islamabad, Federal 44000, Pakistan
    • Umama Waheed, Ms-PPT* · Contactumem.kkhan@gmail.com · 03355823347
    • Umama Waheed, Ms-PPT* · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 7 months later.

Of 800 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Autism Spectrum Disorder, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 823 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2026
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07921199
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Qamar Mahmood, PhD
Contact
qamarmahmood@riphah.edu.pk
03335151063
Umama Waheed, MS-PPT*
Contact
umem.kkhan@gmail.com
03355823347
Qamar Mahmood, Phd
principal investigator · Riphah International University Islamabad

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion