ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07918248Updated Nov 9, 2026

The Effect of Kinesio Taping

An interventional study of Application of Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension and Tension-free (0% tension) Kinesio Tape application in Athlete and Adolescent, sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 10 Years to 19 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Nov 9, 2026Interventions changedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 19 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Basketball is an intermittent team sport characterized by a high frequency of complex movements that require high-intensity sprints, sudden changes of direction, jumping, landing, and quick reactions. Kinesiotape is an elastic therapeutic taping method applied to the skin without significantly restricting range of motion; it is used to help manage musculoskeletal symptoms, provide functional support, stimulate proprioception, enhance performance, and aid in rehabilitation processes in athletes. It is believed that the level of tension applied during Kinesio Taping can alter the expected effects of the application. Therefore, in this study, Kinesio Tape will be applied to the relevant muscles using two different protocols-one with 50% tension and one without tension-and the differences between these protocols will be compared to a control group (without application), with the effects on vertical jump height and reaction time evaluated.

Read the detailed description

A review of the current literature reveals that research findings on the effects of Kinesio tape application on vertical jump and reaction time present a heterogeneous and conflicting picture. While some studies report small improvements, numerous randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in performance. It is believed that the level of tension in kinesiotape applications may alter the expected effect of the application. While the original Kinesio Taping approach recommends low or near-zero tension for applications on muscles, it has been shown that higher-tension applications can limit inversion-eversion movement by providing mechanical support around the ankle. Therefore, in this study, Kinesio Tape will be applied to the relevant muscles with 50% tension and without tension; the differences between these two application protocols will be compared against the control group (no application), and their effects on vertical jump and reaction time will be evaluated. In this study, adolescent basketball players from a basketball club in Afyonkarahisar will be included. All interventions and assessments for the participants will be conducted in the same club's exercise room. This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. In randomized controlled trials with a crossover design, each participant is randomly assigned to each group after a specified washout period. Therefore, each participant also serves as their own control group. For this study, the washout period will be 1 week. This study includes 3 groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Athlete
  • Adolescent

Keywords

  • kinesiotape
  • reaction time
  • vertical jump
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 115 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 19 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be a male between the ages of 10 and 19,
  • Have played basketball at a sports club for at least one year
  • Have participated regularly in practices over the past 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of any orthopedic or neurological injury within the past 6 months,
  • skin sensitivity to Kinesio Tape,
  • the presence of orthopedic, neurological, cognitive, or cardiovascular disorders that could affect the assessments or the results of the study constitute exclusion criteria.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control Group

    This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. In randomized controlled trials with a crossover design, each participant is randomly assigned to each group after a specified washout period. Therefore, each participant also serves as their own control group. For this study, the washout period will be 1 week.

    Other: Non-intervention (Control)

  • Experimental
    Tension-free (0% tension) Kinesio Tape application

    This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. In randomized controlled trials with a crossover design, each participant is randomly assigned to each group after a specified washout period. Therefore, each participant also serves as their own control group. For this study, the washout period will be 1 week.

    Other: Tension-free (0% tension) Kinesio Tape application

  • Experimental
    Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension

    This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. In randomized controlled trials with a crossover design, each participant is randomly assigned to each group after a specified washout period. Therefore, each participant also serves as their own control group. For this study, the washout period will be 1 week.

    Other: Application of Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension

Interventions

  • OtherApplication of Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension

    In this study, kinesiology taping will be applied bilaterally and performed in a standardized manner by a physical therapist. The taping consists of three strips, which will be applied with 50% tension. The first strip will be applied to the tibialis anterior muscle, the second to the peroneus longus muscle, and the third to the gastrocnemius muscle.

  • OtherTension-free (0% tension) Kinesio Tape application

    The same taping procedure as for "Application of Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension" will be followed, but no tension will be applied.

  • OtherNon-intervention (Control)

    No Kinesio Taping will be performed on participants.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vertical Jumping

    Vertical jump will be assessed using the G-Walk motion analysis system and Kinovea during the bilateral counter-movement jump (CMJ, vertical jump technique). Vertical jump height will be recorded.

    Time frame: Assessments will be conducted a total of 6 times-before and after the implementation of each intervention approach, and over a 3-week period. Each assessment takes approximately 5 minutes.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Interventions
Arm changed Group→Control Group. Arms added: Tension-free (0% tension) Kinesio Tape application·Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension; arms removed: Group 1·Group 2
Nov 9, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Interventions Arm changed Group→Control Group. Arms added: Tension-free (0% tension) Kinesio Tape application·Kinesio Tape with 50% Tension; arms removed: Group 1·Group 2
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07918248
Responsible party
Emel Taşvuran Horata (Assoc. Prof., Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Emel Taşvuran Horata, PhD
Contact
ethorata@gmail.com
+905547759663
Erdal Horata, PhD
Contact
ethorata@gmail.com
+905056092631
EMEL TAŞVURAN HORATA, PhD
principal investigator · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Erdal Horata, PhD
study chair · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Fatma Eken, PhD
study chair · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Dilara Kara, PhD
study chair · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Arife Nur Kanyılmaz
study chair · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Şemsinur Demirparmak
study chair · Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion