ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07917455Plasma ConcentUpdated Nov 4, 2026

Plasma Concentration Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Emergency Department Patients: Comparison of Two Laboratory Methods

An observational study in Drug Monitoring, Anticoagulants and Factor Xa Inhibitors, sponsored by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA. Completed at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA · Observational

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
142
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether two laboratory tests give the same results when measuring blood levels of blood thinners. The study looked at adults who take direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and came to an emergency department. DOACs are blood thinners such as apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban.

Doctors do not usually measure DOAC levels in the blood. In an emergency, though, knowing the level can help doctors decide on treatment. This matters, for example, when a person is bleeding or has a blood clot.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Do a standard hospital test and a more precise reference test give similar DOAC levels?
  • How many participants have DOAC levels that are too low, normal or too high?
  • Are levels that are too low or too high linked to emergency visits for bleeding or blood clots?

Participants:

  • gave one blood sample when they arrived at the emergency department
  • received their usual care, with no change to their treatment

Researchers measured the DOAC level in each sample with both tests. They also collected information from medical records, such as the reason for the visit and the time since the last DOAC dose.

Read the detailed description

At Emergency Department admission, a dedicated blood sample (plain tube, without anticoagulant or gel separator) was collected from each participant. DOAC concentration was measured with two methods:

  • Indirect method: chromogenic anti-factor IIa (dabigatran) or anti-factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) assays, performed at the laboratory of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo.
  • Direct method: validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), performed at the Toxicology Laboratory of Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia. Serum was stored at -80°C until analysis.

Clinical data were collected from medical records using a dedicated case report form: demographics, medical history, concomitant medications, DOAC type, indication and daily dose, reason for ED access, time since last DOAC intake, routine laboratory tests (blood count, creatinine, AST, ALT, INR, PT, aPTT), treatment (including antidotes) and outcome of the acute episode. No follow-up was performed.

DOAC levels were classified as below, within or above the expected range for each drug. Agreement between methods was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval and Bland-Altman plots. Associations between DOAC level categories and ED access for coagulation-related problems were analyzed with chi-square or Fisher's exact test and univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The sample size was calculated to estimate an expected ICC of 0.75 with a 95% confidence interval width of 0.15.

02

Conditions studied

  • Drug Monitoring
  • Anticoagulants
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors
  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)
  • Plasma Concentration

Keywords

  • therapeutic drug monitoring
  • Real-world setting
  • Direct oral anticoagulants
  • LC-MS/MS
  • Anti-Xa assay
  • DOAC
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Convenience sample of adults on chronic DOAC therapy who came to the Emergency Department of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, between June 2024 and 2025.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or rivaroxaban)
  • Access to the Emergency Department of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, for any reason
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unknown time between last DOAC intake and Emergency Department access
  • Missing other essential study data
  • Repeated Emergency Department access by a person already enrolled in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
142 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Adults on chronic DOAC therapy presenting to the Emergency Department

    People on chronic therapy with apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or rivaroxaban who came to the Emergency Department of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo for any reason. Each participant gave one blood sample at arrival, analyzed with both laboratory methods. Clinical care was not changed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Agreement between DOAC plasma concentrations measured by chromogenic assay and by HPLC-MS/MS

    Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, unitless, range 0 to 1) between DOAC plasma concentrations (ng/mL) measured in the same blood sample with a DOAC-specific chromogenic anti-factor IIa/anti-factor Xa assay and with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Higher values indicate better agreement.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. DOAC plasma concentration measured by chromogenic assay

    Plasma concentration (ng/mL) of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or rivaroxaban measured with a DOAC-specific chromogenic anti-factor IIa (dabigatran) or anti-factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) assay.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. DOAC plasma concentration measured by HPLC-MS/MS

    Plasma concentration (ng/mL) of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or rivaroxaban measured with a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Percentage of participants with DOAC plasma concentrations below, within or above the expected range

    Percentage of participants whose DOAC plasma concentration, measured by HPLC-MS/MS, falls below, within or above the expected on-treatment range for the specific drug, dose and sampling time (peak or trough).

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Percentage of participants with Emergency Department access for bleeding or thrombosis

    Percentage of participants whose reason for Emergency Department access was a coagulation-related problem (major or minor bleeding, or thrombosis), as recorded in the medical record, reported by DOAC plasma concentration category (below, within or above the expected range).

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Lombardy 27100, Italy
  • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS
    Pavia, Lombardy 27100, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gosselin RC, Adcock DM, Bates SM, Douxfils J, Favaloro EJ, Gouin-Thibault I, Guillermo C, Kawai Y, Lindhoff-Last E, Kitchen S. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Recommendations for Laboratory Measurement of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;118(3):437-450. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627480. Epub 2018 Feb 12. PubMed 29433148 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly, as the informed consent did not include data sharing and in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Aggregate results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 11 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 23, 2026
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
StartActual
Jun 10, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 1, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2025
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07917455
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Jun 10, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025
Completion
Jun 1, 2025
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion