ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07916662Updated Nov 4, 2026

Segmental Thoracic vs Lumbar Spinal: Recovery After Elective Cesarean

An interventional study of Lumbar spinal anesthesia and Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia in Cesarean, sponsored by Adiyaman University Research Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Adiyaman University Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compares thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (T10-11) with conventional lumbar spinal anesthesia (L4-5) in patients undergoing elective cesarean section. The primary outcome is postoperative quality of recovery assessed with the ObsQoR-11 score. Secondary outcomes include block characteristics (onset time, number of blocked dermatomes, presence of sacral sparing, and postoperative motor block assessed with the Bromage scale), hemodynamic parameters, vasopressor and anticholinergic requirements, perioperative complications, and time to first mobilization.

Read the detailed description

Cesarean delivery is most commonly performed under lumbar spinal anesthesia. Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia, performed at a higher interspace, may produce a more segmental block with less lower-limb motor involvement. Evidence in obstetric patients is limited. This trial will test whether the level of spinal injection, with agent, dose, and volume held constant, affects postoperative recovery after elective cesarean delivery.

Prospective, single-center, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 1:1 allocation. (Computer-generated block randomization) Patients and outcome assessors will be masked to allocation; the anesthesiologist performing the block cannot be masked.

All patients will receive isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% 1.5 mL (7.5 mg) with fentanyl 25 mcg (0.5 mL), total volume 2 mL, identical in both arms. Lumbar arm: L4-5 interspace. Thoracic arm: T10-11 interspace. The level will be identified by landmark technique with the patient in the sitting position, using a 26 G pencil-point spinal needle.

Spinal success will be tested by sensory and motor examination. Sensory block (onset, blocked dermatomes, sacral sparing) will be tested with pinprick, and motor block with the modified Bromage scale. Surgery will start when the block reaches T5. In case of a patchy block or inadequate sensory level, conversion to general anesthesia is planned.

Patients will be monitored with standard ASA monitoring. Hypotension will be defined as mean arterial pressure below 60 mmHg or a decrease of more than 20% from baseline, and will be treated with ephedrine 5 mg IV boluses. Bradycardia will be defined as a heart rate below 50 beats/min and will be treated with atropine 0.5 mg IV. Fluid replacement, antiemetic prophylaxis, postoperative analgesia, and the mobilization protocol will be identical in both arms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • quality of recovery
  • thoracal segmental spinal anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Adiyaman University Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section
  • Age 18-45 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to spinal anesthesia
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant use
  • Infection at puncture site
  • Severe cardiac disease
  • Patient refusal
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia

    Participants allocated to this arm will receive spinal anesthesia at the T10-11 interspace for elective cesarean delivery. After injection, onset time of the block, the number of blocked dermatomes, and the presence or absence of sacral sparing will be recorded, and motor block will be assessed with the modified Bromage scale at predefined intervals during the first 24 postoperative hours . All procedures will be performed by experienced anesthesiologists under standard monitoring. Fluid co-loading, hypotension and bradycardia thresholds with the corresponding vasopressor and atropine

    Procedure: Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia

  • Active comparator
    Lumbar Spinal Anesthesia

    Lumbar Spinal Anesthesia Participants in this group will receive conventional spinal anesthesia performed at the lumbar interspace Procedure/Surgery: Lumbar Spinal Anesthesia- (L4-5). The goal is to achieve a standard sensory block level adequate for cesarean delivery. All procedures will be performed by experienced anesthesiologists under standardized conditions. Intraoperative management, including hemodynamic support and fluid administration, will follow the same institutional protocol as in the thoracic group.

    Procedure: Lumbar spinal anesthesia

Interventions

  • ProcedureLumbar spinal anesthesia

    Participants in this group will receive conventional spinal anesthesia performed at the lumbar interspace ( L4-5)

  • ProcedureThoracic segmental spinal anesthesia

    Spinal anesthesia will be performed at the thoracic interspace (T10-11)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 score

    Quality of recovery was assessed using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 (ObsQoR-11) questionnaire. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 110, where 110 indicates the best possible recovery and 0 indicates the worst.

    Time frame: at Postoperative 24th hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean arterial pressure

    Mean arterial pressure (MAP), defined as the time-weighted average arterial pressure over a single cardiac cycle, was calculated using the standard formula: MAP = \[(2 × diastolic blood pressure) + systolic blood pressure\] / 3. Continuous or intermittent MAP measurements were used to assess hemodynamic stability and adequacy of organ perfusion throughout the perioperative period. Intraoperative hypotension was predefined as a MAP \<6o mmHg.

    Time frame: 0, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes intraoperatively

  2. Heart rate

    Heart rate (HR), expressed as beats per minute (bpm), was continuously monitored using standard electrocardiography. HR was used as an indicator of autonomic and hemodynamic response throughout the perioperative period. Tachycardia was predefined as HR \>100 bpm and bradycardia as HR \<50 bpm.

    Time frame: 0. - 5. - 15. - 30. - 45. minutes intraoperatively

  3. Onset time of sensory block

    Time from completion of intrathecal injection to loss of sensation to pinprick at the \[ T4\] dermatome, assessed every 1 minute until the level is reached.

    Time frame: Within 15 minutes after completion of intrathecal injection

  4. Number of blocked dermatomes

    Highest and lowest blocked dermatome levels assessed by pinprick testing, and the total number of blocked dermatomes calculated from them.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after completion of intrathecal injection.

  5. Motor block (modified Bromage scale)

    Motor block will be assessed with the modified Bromage scale (0 = able to raise the extended leg; 1 = unable to raise the extended leg but able to flex the knee; 2 = unable to flex the knee but able to move the foot; 3 = unable to move the leg or foot).

    Time frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  6. VAS scores

    Numeric rating scale (0-10) pain scores at rest and on movement. 0 refer no pain and 10 refer the worst pain

    Time frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07916662
Lead sponsor
Adiyaman University Research Hospital
Responsible party
Nezir Yılmaz (Assoc. Prof., Adiyaman University Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Nov 5, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

NEZİR YILMAZ, Associate Professor
Contact
yilmaznezir@hotmail.com
05068939496

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion