ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07913412PRIMEUpdated Nov 3, 2026

High-precision Radiosurgery Followed by Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach in Patients With High-prominence Uveal Melanoma: Modern Radiation Techniques and Outcomes

An observational study in Uveal Melanoma, High-risk Uveal Melanoma and Prominent Uveal Melanoma, sponsored by University Hospital, Essen. Recruiting at 3 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Essen · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

High-precision radiosurgery followed by minimally invasive surgical approach in patients with high-prominence uveal melanomas: modern radiation techniques and outcomes. Evaluation of outcome regarding multiparametric parameters and co-factors

Read the detailed description

The aim here is to prospectively evaluate modern technical standards. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of the updated basic diagnostics and high-resolution diagnostics for radiation planning and the new technical therapy standards (therapy options in application: volume modulated rapid arc technique (VMAT) / online arc technique (VMAT) / online onboard image-guidance (IGRT), by means of the newly established Clinic for Radiation Therapy 2019-2021) depending on known prognostic parameters for quality assurance of the long-term outcome (overall survival, local tumor control). This will lay the basis for standardizing treatment parameters as far as possible, but also to introduce improvements in the treatment of future patients.

Scientific background (state of research (with literature references) and

Derivation of the research question (rationale)):

The eye can be affected by several neoplastic processes, which can lead either primarily or secondary to systemic metastasis. The most common primary tumors of the eye include conjunctival melanoma and uveal melanoma. Metastases from systemic malignant diseases, particularly of the breast and lungs, can also affect the eye.

A combination of ophthalmologic examination, MRI and additional tests and cytologic/histopathologic evaluation leads to an accurate diagnosis.

Depending on the tumor manifestation, treatment consists of a multimodal concept. In the case of uveal melanomas and the aim of preserving the globe and and visual acuity preservation, radiotherapy is one of the most important treatment modalities that can be applied.

In the last 20 years, radiotherapy has developed rapidly away from two-dimensional modulated, three-dimensional techniques. But here too the high level of technical diversity in radiotherapy and ever newer technical innovations, there is a broad spectrum of radiotherapy. Standard therapy can be performed using modern devices, the high-precision stereotactic linear accelerators (irradiation devices), can be safely further optimized. This is to be tested in the Department of Radiotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uveal Melanoma
  • High-risk Uveal Melanoma
  • Prominent Uveal Melanoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • radiotherapy
  • radiosurgery
  • minimal invasive
  • surgery and resection
  • vision
  • eyesight
03

In context

Uveal Melanoma

281 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveal Melanoma; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 100 across 37 observational studies indexed under Uveal Melanoma.

Browse Uveal Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Essen is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Inclusion Criteria:

- Resectability, high-prominent and high risk uveal melanoma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EOE
  • lux defect (If a medical report notes a "lux defect" alongside this, it refers to a deficit in light perception (from the Latin lux for light). It means the eye's ability to sense light, darkness, or light direction is impaired)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Functional Resectability,
  • Technical Resectability
  • high-prominent uveal melanoma

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EOE
  • At least in part remaining eye function that can be saved
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Local control

    Local control

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  2. Function: Visual acuity:

    Visual function assessed separately for each eye. Visual acuity: decimal scale,range 2,0 - 0,01: decimal acuity scale

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  3. Quality of Life, ophthalmic cancer-specific quality of life

    Quality of Life, ophthalmic cancer-specific quality of life 1\) EORTC QLQ-OPT30 (ophthalmic cancer-specific quality of life): Scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater visual impairment, ocular symptoms, and functional difficulties.

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  4. Progression Free Survival

    Progression Free Survival

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  5. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  6. Function: Visual acuity:

    Visual function assessed separately for each eye. Visual acuity: decimal scale,range 2,0 - 0,01: decimal acuity scale; furthermore, 1.Count-fingers, 2.hand-motion and 3.light-perception categories are recorded separately when acuity cannot be quantified: for each item: value yes / no

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  7. Function: Visual field

    Visual field: Automated perimetry, Visual Field Index (VFI, %): 0 % - 100%,

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  8. Quality of Life general quality of life

    EORTC QLQ-C30 (general quality of life): Scores range from 0-100; A) higher scores indicate better functioning/global quality of life B) symptom scores: indicate greater symptom burden on symptom scales.

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  9. Function: Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT): Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, measured in µm and classified in percentiles (regarding normal values)

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  10. Cornea

    corneal outcome: thickness measured in µm

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  11. Cornea

    Corneal outcome modified Stocker's classification: category 0 No damage no injury category 1 corneal guttae without epithelial or stromal edema. category 2 corneal guttae with epithelial or stromal edema. category 3 corneal edema associated with scar formation. category 4 corneal opacification with neovascularization, modified Stocker's classification

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

  12. Corneal overall outcome classification

    category 0 No corneal-ulcus category 1 Irregular punctate epithelial defects category 2 Non-healing epithelial defects / persistent epithelial defect (PED) category 3 Ulcer perforation

    Time frame: At 3 months, every 6 months up to 24 months, and annually thereafter up to 60 -120 months.

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Guberina M, Sokolenko E, Guberina N, Dalbah S, Pottgen C, Lubcke W, Indenkampen F, Lachmuth M, Fluhs D, Chen Y, Hoffmann C, Deuschl C, Jabbarli L, Fiorentzis M, Foerster A, Rating P, Ebenau M, Grunewald T, Bechrakis N, Stuschke M. Feasibility, Method and Early Outcome of Image-Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiosurgery Followed by Resection for AJCC Stage IIA-IIIB High-Risk Large Intraocular Melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;14(19):4729. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194729. PubMed 36230660 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — dependent on the project

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07913412
Responsible party
Maja Guberina (Principle Investigator, University Hospital, Essen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Maja Guberina, PD MD
Contact
maja.guberina@uk-essen.de
0201 723 83121

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion