An interventional study of Interactive AI Avatar Simulation and Written AI Chatbot Simulation in Artifical Intelligence, Generative Artificial Intelligence and Counseling, sponsored by Manisa Celal Bayar University. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.
Sponsored by Manisa Celal Bayar University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The goal of this parallel-group randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of two different generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools (a video/audio interactive AI avatar versus a written AI learning assistant (chatbot)) on patient counseling skills self-assessment levels and instructional materials motivation in undergraduate nursing students.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
Manisa Celal Bayar University is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Interactive AI Avatar Simulation
Other: Written AI Chatbot Simulation
Students engage in virtual patient education and counseling simulation using a video/audio interactive AI avatar trained on a standardized nursing clinical case scenario. The simulation is completed asynchronously across at least 2 to 3 practice sessions. The intervention aims to develop students' health counseling self-efficacy and learning motivation.
Students engage in virtual patient education and counseling simulation using a text-based AI chatbot trained on the same standardized nursing clinical case scenario and learning objectives. The simulation is completed asynchronously across at least 2 to 3 practice sessions. The intervention aims to develop students' health counseling self-efficacy and learning motivation.
Change in Counseling Skills Self-Assessment Score
Evaluated using the Self-Assessment Scale for Counselling Skills in Health Services. The scale consists of 44 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). It encompasses three subscales: Communication Skills (items 1-10), Professionalism (items 11-25), and Counseling Application Skills (items 26-44). Total scores range from 44 to 220, with higher scores reflecting higher self-assessed levels of counseling competence in healthcare services.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and Post-Intervention (upon completion of 2 to 3 asynchronous practice sessions, within a 15-week academic period)
Instructional Materials Motivation Score
Evaluated using the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey. The scale is a single-dimensional 14-item instrument scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher overall or mean scores indicate higher positive motivation toward the specific generative AI instructional tool utilized during the intervention.
Time frame: Post-Intervention (upon completion of 2 to 3 asynchronous practice sessions, within a 15-week academic period)
User Application Feedback Score
It is aimed to assess students' subjective evaluations, user experience, and overall satisfaction with the assigned AI instructional tool.
Time frame: Post-Intervention (upon completion of 2 to 3 asynchronous practice sessions, within a 15-week academic period)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Manisa Celal Bayar University