ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07908277Updated Nov 3, 2026

Mapping Recovery, Quality of Life, and Physical Function After Partial and Radical Nephrectomy

An observational study in Nephrectomy / Methods and Nephrectomy, sponsored by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital · Observational

Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim:

To investigate recovery, quality of life, and physical function before and after partial or radical nephrectomy.

To validate the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire in a urological cohort and investigate whether the questionnaire can be used to identify differences in patient-reported recovery across patient populations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nephrectomy / Methods
  • Nephrectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Herlev and Gentofte Hospital is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients >18 years scheduled for radical or partial nephrectomy

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled for radical or partial nephrectomy (all surgical approaches).
  • Benign or malignant indication for surgery.
  • Age >18 years. Exclusion criteria
  • Unable to read Danish.
  • Unable to complete the questionnaire.
  • Emergency surgery.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Month
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • OtherNone, observational study

    None, observational study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of recovery from enrollment to outpatient follow-up 21 days after surgery

    Quality of recovery is evaluated with the danish translation of the verified questionnaire Quality of Recovery-15. It is a 15-item patient questionnaire, where the score ranges from 0-150. A higher score indicates better patient-reported quality of recovery. QoR-15 will be assessed preoperatively, and 1, 2, 7 and 21 days after surgery. Change in QoR-15 from enrollment to 21 days after surgery is the primary outcome measure. Change in QoR-15 at other assessment times will be assessed as secondary outcome measures.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up 21 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Recovery at other predefined time points.

    Quality of recovery is measured by the danish translation of the verified questionnaire Quality of Recovery-15. It is a 15-item patient questionnaire, where the score ranges from 0-150. A higher score indicates better patient-reported quality of recovery. QoR-15 will be assessed at preoperatively, and 1, 2, 7 and 21 days after surgery.

    Time frame: Multiple times from enrollment to outpatient follow-up at 21 days after surgery

  2. Change in quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L

    Quality of life is evaluated with the danish translation of the validated questionnaire EQ-5D-5L. The questionnaire evalutes five health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual acitivites, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) ranging from "no problems" to "unable/ extreme problems". Additionally, it includes a visual analog scale scoring from 0-100, reflecting the participants overall self-reported health state. A higher score indicates a better patient-reported quality of life. Quality of life will be assessed preoperatively and 21 days after surgery.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up 21 days after surgery

  3. Physical function assessed using the 30 second sit to stand, handgrip strength and 6 minute walking test.

    Physical function assessed using the 30 second sit to stand test (number of repetitions in 30s), handgrip strength test (maximum voluntary muscle strength in kg) and 6 minute walking test (distance in meters). The higher the test results, the better, for all tests. The tests are performed preoperatively and 21 days after surgery.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up, 21 days after surgery

  4. Validation parameters for the Quality of Recovery-15.

    An evaluation of validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility of the Quality of Recovery-15, assessed preoperatively, and 1, 2, 7 and 21 days after surgery.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow up, 21 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 14 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 22, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartActual
Oct 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Secondary outcomes
2 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionPhysical function assessed using the 30 second sit to stand, handgrip strength and 6 minute walking test.: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionValidation parameters for the Quality of Recovery-15.: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 3, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 2 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionPhysical function assessed using the 30 second sit to stand, handgrip strength and 6 minute walking test.: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionValidation parameters for the Quality of Recovery-15.: how it is measured was reworded
  2. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07908277
Lead sponsor
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Responsible party
Marie Juul-Haslund (Principal investigator, medical doctor, ph.d.-fellow, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Oct 22, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion