ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07907250Updated Oct 30, 2026

F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT-Guided Pain Palliation in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Comparative Study of ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-Corticosteroid-Local Anaesthetic Injection vs Corticosteroid-Local Anaesthetic Injection

An interventional study of Patients receiving F-18 NaF PET/CT-guided Lutetium-177 - corticosteroid - local anesthetic and Patients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid - local anaesthetic in Plantar Fascitis and Chronic Heel Pain, sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. Recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study type: Prospective, randomized, comparative pilot clinical study.

Purpose of the study: The goal of this study is to evaluate whether adding low-dose, F-18 sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT-guided intralesional Lutetium-177 therapy to corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection provides better pain relief and functional improvement than PET/CT-guided corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection alone in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis who have not responded to conservative treatment for more than six months.

Participant population: Adults aged 18-80 years with chronic plantar fasciitis lasting more than six months, failure of conservative treatment, a baseline visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of ≥4, and focal uptake at the plantar fascia insertion on F-18 NaF PET/CT. The study plans to recruit 40 participants, with 20 participants in each group.

Primary Outcomes:

1. Improvement in foot-specific pain and function, assessed by the change in the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) score, and health-related quality of life, assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire, from baseline to three months.

Secondary outcomes :

  1. Change in pain intensity measured by VAS (0-10).
  2. Change in osteoblastic activity measured by SUVmax on F-18 NaF PET/CT,
  3. Safety and tolerability at three and six months

Comparison groups:

Group A (intervention): F-18 NaF PET/CT-guided injection of Lutetium-177 (37-74 MBq; 1-2 mCi) combined with corticosteroid (30 mg) and local anaesthetic.

Group B (comparison): F-18 NaF PET/CT-guided injection of corticosteroid (30 mg) and local anaesthetic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plantar Fascitis
  • Chronic Heel Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-80 years with chronic plantar fasciitis (>6 months).
  2. Failed to conservative therapy.
  3. Baseline VAS ≥4.
  4. Focal uptake at plantar fascia insertion on F-18 NaF PET/CT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior radiation therapy to the foot/heel.
  2. Active infection at the injection site or systemic infection.
  3. Pregnancy or lactation. (Pregnancy test for women of .)
  4. Coagulopathy ( >1.5 or \<100,000/µL) is not correctable.
  5. Uncontrolled diabetes or severe peripheral vascular disease affecting wound healing.
  6. Known allergy to agents would be used for local anaesthesia or to any component of the injection.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: Patients receiving F-18 NaF PET/CT-guided Lutetium-177 - corticosteroid - local anesthetic

    After confirming the needle position at the target site by F18 NaF PET/CT, the pre-measured ¹⁷⁷Lu dose (1-2 mCi of 177Lu, 30 mg corticosteroid and 0.5ml bupivacaine) will be injected slowly into the peri-insertional region of the plantar fascia, followed by flushing the tract with 0.9% NaCl solution. The injection volume will be kept minimal (0.2-1.0 mL) to ensure precise localisation without unwanted spread.

    Procedure: Patients receiving F-18 NaF PET/CT-guided Lutetium-177 - corticosteroid - local anesthetic

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Patients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid - local anaesthetic

    After confirming the needle position at the target site by F18 NaF PET/CT, the pre-measured corticosteroid dose(30mg) combined with local anaesthetic (0.5ml of 0.25% bupivacaine) will be injected slowly into the peri-insertional region of the plantar fascia. The injection volume

    Procedure: Patients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid - local anaesthetic

Interventions

  • ProcedurePatients receiving F-18 NaF PET/CT-guided Lutetium-177 - corticosteroid - local anesthetic

    After confirming the needle position at the target site by F18 NaF PET/CT, 1-2 mCi of Lutetium-177, 30 mg corticosteroid and 0.5ml bupivacaine will be injected.

  • ProcedurePatients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid - local anaesthetic

    After confirming the needle position at the target site by F18 NaF PET/CT, 30 mg corticosteroid and 0.5ml bupivacaine will be injected.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ score) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12 questionnaire)

    Change in Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ score) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12 questionnaire) from baseline to 3 months.

    Time frame: 3 months from baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in VAS score

    Change in the Visual analogue scale (0-10)

    Time frame: 3 months from baseline

  2. Change in SUVmax

    Change in the osteoblastic activity (measured by SUVmax) at the plantar fascia insertion point

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Adverse events following Lutetium 177 administration

    Any adverse events because of the administartion of lutetium 177 will be assessed

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 17 months after the start.

Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 17 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2026
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07907250
Responsible party
Rajender Kumar (Additional Professor, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Rajender Kumar
Contact
drrajender2010@gmail.com
+91 9216605341

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion