ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT07899060Updated Oct 27, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of RashEndZ Wound Aeration Technology

An interventional study of Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy (DOST) and Standard Wound Care in Incontinence-associated Dermatitis and Decubitus Ulcer, sponsored by RashEndZ Inc.. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by RashEndZ Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Why this study was terminated
Enrollment challenges, limited sponsor resources, and a smaller than expected eligible patient population.

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Mar 2017, 9 years 8 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 4 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2016, registered Mar 2021).
Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology and Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy in improving symptoms and expediting healing of IAD and DU in adult patients.

Read the detailed description

To achieve this aim, this study will evaluate the following objectives:

Objective 1:

Assess the safety and tolerability of the RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology with Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy for the treatment of Incontinent Associated Dermatitis (IAD) and Decubitus Ulcers (DU) in adult patients.

Objective 2:

Compare treatment responses (symptomatic and clinical) to RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology with Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy and current standard of care in patients with IAD and DU

Objective 3:

Compare time course of symptom improvement in IAD and DU patients treated with RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology with Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy and current standards of care

The hypotheses to be tested in this study are as follows:

  • RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology with Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy is well tolerated by patients with IAD and/or DU
  • In patients with IAD or DU, the beneficial treatment responses are higher in patients treated with RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology with Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy compared to patients treated with current standards of care
  • RashEndZ therapeutic liner technology and Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy reduce healing time in patients with IAD and DU at a faster rate compared to patients with IAD and DU treated with current standard of care.
02

Conditions studied

  • Incontinence-associated Dermatitis
  • Decubitus Ulcer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Topical Oxygen Therapy
  • Continuous Wound Oxygenation
  • Pressure Injury
  • Moisture-Associated Skin Damage
  • Occlusive Wound Dressing
03

In context

Pressure Ulcer

528 studies on the registry are indexed under Pressure Ulcer; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 70 across 403 interventional studies indexed under Pressure Ulcer.

Browse Pressure Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with RashEndZ Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult Patients diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 wounds, IAD, or pressure ulcers on any location of the body.
  2. Age: any adult age.
  3. Weight: any weight.
  4. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical instability (e.g. hemodynamic instability necessitating vasopressors and/or mechanical ventilation)
  2. Urinary catheterization
  3. Known terminal illnesses
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group

    Application of Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy, a non-pressurized, continuous topical oxygen therapy at 3-4 L/min.

    Device: Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy (DOST)

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Application of standard therapies for candidate wound types

    Other: Standard Wound Care

Interventions

  • DeviceDynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy (DOST)

    Continuous application of respiratory oxygen, at 3-4 L/min, to each wound using the patented RashEndZ Wound Aeration Technology

    Also known as: Topical Oxygen Therapy (TOT), RashEndZ Advanced Occlusive Wound Dressing (AOWD)

  • OtherStandard Wound Care

    Existing protocols typically include topical medications and barrier ointments

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse Events

    Count of participants with adverse events, including skin irritation or patient-reported discomfort, attributed to Dynamic Oxygen Skin Therapy (DOST) delivered via RashEndZ Wound Aeration Technology, recorded on daily assessment datasheets.

    Time frame: Start of treatment until wound closure or discharge, up to 8 days

  2. Number of Participants Who Discontinued DOST Due to Intolerance

    Count of participants whose DOST treatment was stopped because side effects or adverse events required cessation of DOST and initiation of standard-of-care treatment, per the protocol definition of "poorly tolerated."

    Time frame: Start of treatment until end of treatment, up to 8 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Change in IADS Score per Treatment Day

    Change from baseline in IADS score (range 0-52, lower scores indicate less severe IAD) divided by number of treatment days, to describe the time course of change in each group.

    Time frame: Baseline (enrollment) to end of treatment, up to 8 days

  2. Change From Baseline in IADS Score at End of Treatment

    Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Severity (IADS) score (Borchert et al., 2010; range 0-52, lower scores indicate less severe IAD) at end of treatment minus score at enrollment, reported descriptively for each group in participants with IAD.

    Time frame: Baseline (enrollment) and end of treatment, up to 8 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Florida Hospital Tampa (AdventHealth)
    Tampa, Florida, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nuutila K, Eriksson E. Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Dec;10(12):685-698. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1232. Epub 2021 Feb 11. PubMed 32870777 ↗
  • Borchert K, Bliss DZ, Savik K, Radosevich DM. The incontinence-associated dermatitis and its severity instrument: development and validation. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;37(5):527-35. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181edac3e. PubMed 20736860 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07899060
Lead sponsor
RashEndZ Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Jun 21, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 2, 2017
Completion
Mar 15, 2018
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Paul Arnold, M.D.
principal investigator · AdventHealth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion