ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07896148Updated Oct 26, 2026

Mindfulness Training to Promote Prosocial Tendencies in Nursing Students

An interventional study of Mindfulness Training and Alternative Educational Workshop in Mindfulness Training in Nursing Students, sponsored by Qom University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Iran. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Qom University of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 26, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary

This study aims to examine the effects of a six-week mindfulness training program on mindfulness, moral identity, and prosocial tendencies among undergraduate nursing students. Nursing students were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Students in the intervention group participated in six weekly mindfulness sessions, supplemented by guided audio materials and opportunities for daily practice. Students in the control group participated in an alternative educational workshop.

The study outcomes were assessed before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and at a two-month follow-up. The study seeks to determine whether mindfulness training can improve nursing students' mindfulness, moral identity, and prosocial tendencies over time. The findings may help inform the development of educational approaches to support nursing students' personal and professional development.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mindfulness Training in Nursing Students

Keywords

  • Mindfulness
  • Nursing Students
  • Moral Identity
  • Prosocial Tendencies
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Mindfulness Training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Qom University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrollment as a first-, second-, or third-year undergraduate nursing student at the participating institution during the study period.

Willingness to participate in the study and provision of . Exclusion Criteria:Withdrawal of consent or voluntary discontinuation of participation during the study.

-

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
168 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mindfulness Intervention Group

    Participants in this group received a six-week mindfulness training intervention consisting of six weekly 60-minute face-to-face sessions delivered by a health psychologist. The sessions were supplemented with guided audio materials and practice resources shared through a mobile messaging platform. Participants were encouraged to practice mindfulness for at least 10 minutes daily.

    Behavioral: Mindfulness Training

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in the control group attended an alternative educational workshop instead of the mindfulness training program. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention period, and at the two-month follow-up.

    Behavioral: Alternative Educational Workshop

Interventions

  • BehavioralMindfulness Training

    A six-week mindfulness training program consisting of six weekly 60-minute face-to-face sessions delivered by a health psychologist. The sessions were supplemented with guided audio materials and practice resources shared through a mobile messaging platform. Participants were encouraged to practice mindfulness for at least 10 minutes daily.

  • BehavioralAlternative Educational Workshop

    Participants in the control group attended an alternative educational workshop during the study period. After completion of data collection, participants in the control group were given access to the mindfulness intervention materials, and participants in the intervention group were provided with the content of the alternative educational workshop.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in prosocial tendencies scores from baseline to post-intervention and two-month follow-up

    Prosocial tendencies were measured using the 25-item Revised Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM-R). Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale, with item 5 reverse-scored. Total scores range from 25 to 125, with higher scores indicating greater prosocial tendencies. Changes in scores were evaluated by comparing the intervention and control groups across the three assessment time points.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention), immediately after the six-week intervention, and two months after the post-intervention assessment.

  2. Change in mindfulness scores from baseline to post-intervention and two-month follow-up

    Mindfulness was measured using the 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Total scores range from 15 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness. Scores were compared between the intervention and control groups across the three assessment time points.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention), immediately after the six-week intervention, and two months after the post-intervention assessment.

  3. Change in moral identity scores from baseline to post-intervention and two-month follow-up

    Among participants in the intervention group, associations between homework adherence scores and changes in mindfulness, prosocial tendencies, and moral identity scores were examined using regression analyses. Homework adherence was assessed using a researcher-developed six-item questionnaire, with higher scores indicating greater engagement with the assigned mindfulness practices.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention), immediately after the six-week intervention, and two months after the post-intervention assessment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association between homework adherence and changes in mindfulness, prosocial tendencies, and moral identity

    Homework adherence was assessed using a researcher-developed six-item questionnaire informed by previous literature on homework adherence. Higher scores indicated greater engagement with and completion of assigned mindfulness practices. Associations between homework adherence scores and changes in mindfulness, prosocial tendencies, and moral identity were examined among participants in the intervention group using regression analyses.

    Time frame: Immediately after the six-week intervention and two months after the post-intervention assessment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qom University of Medical Sciences
    Qom, Iran
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07896148
Lead sponsor
Qom University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Ashraf Khoramirad (Associate Professor, Qom University of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2025
Completion
Feb 27, 2025
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion