ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07895251Updated Oct 27, 2026

Chlorhexidine Gel After Third Molar Surgery

An interventional study of Chlorhexidine 0.2% Gel in Postoperative Wound Healing, sponsored by University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City. Completed at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 27, 2026Title changedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates whether placing 0.2% chlorhexidine gel into the tooth socket after lower wisdom tooth surgery improves gum healing, reduces bacteria on surgical stitches, and decreases postoperative pain, swelling, and difficulty opening the mouth.

Participants require surgical removal of both lower wisdom teeth. Each participant receives both treatments in separate operations at least four weeks apart. One side is randomly assigned to receive 1 mL of chlorhexidine gel before the wound is stitched closed. The other side receives no gel and serves as the comparison. Both sides receive the same standard postoperative care.

Pain and self-reported swelling are assessed on days 1, 3, and 7 after each operation. Facial swelling, mouth opening, and gum healing are assessed on days 3 and 7. A small sample of the surgical stitch is collected on day 7 to measure bacterial growth. Participants are also monitored for dry socket during the seven-day follow-up period.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial compares a single application of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel with no gel after surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. The study is conducted at the Dental Clinic of Tien Giang General Hospital, Vietnam.

The intervention side is randomly assigned by drawing lots, with the contralateral side serving as the control. The same surgeon performs both operations using a standardized surgical protocol, with an interval of at least four weeks between procedures. After tooth removal, both sockets are curetted and irrigated with 0.9% saline. On the intervention side, 1 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel is placed into the socket immediately before closure with 3-0 silk sutures. No gel is applied on the control side. Postoperative medications and care instructions are standardized for both procedures.

Postoperative assessments include patient-reported pain and swelling, changes from baseline in facial measurements and maximum mouth opening, and soft tissue healing. Healing is assessed using the Early Healing Score, which evaluates clinical signs of re-epithelialization, hemostasis, and inflammation. Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more favorable healing.

For microbiological assessment, a 5-mm segment from the second suture knot is collected on postoperative day 7 and placed in 2 mL of sterile saline. The suspension is agitated, serially diluted, and cultured on blood agar. Colonies are counted after 48 hours, and bacterial density is calculated as colony-forming units per milliliter of the original suspension.

The analysis accounts for the paired, within-participant design. Repeated clinical outcomes are analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with adjustment for comparisons across assessment time points.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Wound Healing

Keywords

  • Chlorhexidine gel
  • Bacterial load
  • Suture colonization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City is the lead sponsor of 127 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients requiring surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars.
  • No acute inflammation or infection in either mandibular third molar region at enrollment.
  • Provision of to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to surgical tooth removal.
  • Use of antibiotics or anti-inflammatory medications that could affect wound healing.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Known allergy to the local anesthetic used in the study.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Suspected cystic lesions associated with either mandibular third molar.
  • An adjacent second molar that does not meet the study eligibility requirements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CHX

    The randomly assigned study side receives a single application of 1 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel into the extraction socket immediately after surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar and before closure with 3-0 silk sutures. Standard postoperative medications and care instructions are provided.

    Other: Chlorhexidine 0.2% Gel

  • No intervention
    Control

    The contralateral side undergoes surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar without application of gel into the extraction socket. The socket is curetted, irrigated with 0.9% saline, and closed with 3-0 silk sutures. The same standard postoperative medications and care instructions are provided. The two operations are performed at least four weeks apart.

Interventions

  • OtherChlorhexidine 0.2% Gel

    1 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine gel is applied locally into the extraction socket immediately after tooth removal, curettage, and saline irrigation, before suturing. No repeat application is performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Soft Tissue Healing

    Soft tissue healing at each surgical site is assessed using the Early Healing Score (EHS), comprising clinical signs of re-epithelialization, hemostasis, and inflammation. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more favorable healing. Scores are compared between chlorhexidine-treated and control sites within each participant.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3 and 7 after each surgery.

  2. Bacterial load

    A 5-mm segment from the second suture knot at each surgical site is collected and placed in 2 mL of sterile saline. Following agitation and dilution, the suspension is plated on blood agar, and colonies are counted after 48 hours of incubation. Bacterial density in the original suspension is expressed as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). Lower values indicate a lower culturable bacterial load.

    Time frame: Suture sampling on postoperative day 7 after each surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain

    Participants rate pain at each surgical site using a scale ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 after each surgery.

  2. Patient-Reported Swelling

    Participants rate swelling on the operated side using a scale ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater swelling severity.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 after each surgery.

  3. Facial Swelling

    Facial swelling is assessed using three extraoral distances designated AB, CD, and CE. For each distance, swelling is calculated as the postoperative measurement minus the preoperative measurement and expressed in millimeters. Greater positive changes indicate greater swelling.

    Time frame: Baseline before each surgery and postoperative days 3 and 7.

  4. Trismus

    Maximum mouth opening is measured as the maximum interincisal distance in millimeters. Trismus is calculated as the preoperative distance minus the postoperative distance. Higher positive values indicate greater limitation of mouth opening.

    Time frame: Baseline before each surgery and postoperative days 3 and 7.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Title
Chlorhexidine Gel After Wisdom Tooth Surgery: A Split-Mouth Randomized Trial→Chlorhexidine Gel After Third Molar Surgery
Oct 27, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Title Chlorhexidine Gel After Wisdom Tooth Surgery: A Split-Mouth Randomized Trial→Chlorhexidine Gel After Third Molar Surgery
    + 3 other changes: index terms, responsible party and conditions
  2. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07895251
Responsible party
Lam Cu Phong (Principal Investigator, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026
Completion
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion