ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07893886Updated Oct 26, 2026

Back Massage Before a Cognitive Task in Healthy Young Adults

An interventional study of Classical Back Massage and Passive Rest in Cognitive Performance in Healthy Adults, sponsored by DSW Ideis University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 27 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by DSW Ideis University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Updated Oct 26, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 27 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare a 15-minute back massage, 15 minutes of quiet rest, and no additional break before a mental task in healthy adults aged 18 to 27 years. Each participant will complete all three conditions in a random order at separate visits. The study will measure task accuracy, heart rate, skin conductance, and perceived workload to assess whether massage offers a benefit beyond rest.

Read the detailed description

This randomized crossover study includes three visits approximately two weeks apart. Task practice and individual calibration take place before a seated resting measurement. Participants then receive massage, rest lying face down, or proceed directly to the task. The TLoadDback task lasts 16 minutes at a fixed, individually calibrated pace. Physiological signals are recorded during rest and task performance. Participants complete the NASA-TLX questionnaire after the task.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Performance in Healthy Adults

Keywords

  • Massage
  • Cognitive Workload
  • TLoadDback
03

In context

Lead sponsor

DSW Ideis University is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 27 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 27 years and good general health.
  • and ability to attend three visits.
  • Normal or corrected vision, understanding of Polish instructions, and ability to perform the computer task with the dominant hand.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological, psychiatric, or other conditions that may affect study participation or task performance.
  • Medications or substances affecting autonomic function.
  • to massage, including relevant skin lesions or inflammation.
  • Failure to understand the task after repeated instruction or to complete calibration.
  • Cognitive or relaxation-focused nonpharmacological interventions within the previous three months, excluding recreational physical activity.
  • Caffeine or nicotine within four hours, or strenuous exercise within 12 hours before a visit; the visit may be rescheduled.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
78 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sequence ABC

    Back massage, passive rest, then no additional break; one condition per visit before TLoadDback.

    Other: Classical Back Massage · Behavioral: Passive Rest · Other: No Additional Break

  • Experimental
    Sequence ACB

    Back massage, no additional break, then passive rest; one condition per visit before TLoadDback.

    Other: Classical Back Massage · Behavioral: Passive Rest · Other: No Additional Break

  • Experimental
    Sequence BAC

    Passive rest, back massage, then no additional break; one condition per visit before TLoadDback.

    Other: Classical Back Massage · Behavioral: Passive Rest · Other: No Additional Break

  • Experimental
    Sequence BCA

    Passive rest, no additional break, then back massage; one condition per visit before TLoadDback.

    Other: Classical Back Massage · Behavioral: Passive Rest · Other: No Additional Break

  • Experimental
    Sequence CAB

    No additional break, back massage, then passive rest; one condition per visit before TLoadDback.

    Other: Classical Back Massage · Behavioral: Passive Rest · Other: No Additional Break

  • Experimental
    Sequence CBA

    No additional break, passive rest, then back massage; one condition per visit before TLoadDback.

    Other: Classical Back Massage · Behavioral: Passive Rest · Other: No Additional Break

Interventions

  • OtherClassical Back Massage

    A 15-minute classical back massage while lying face down, delivered by trained personnel before TLoadDback.

  • BehavioralPassive Rest

    A 15-minute quiet rest lying face down on the massage table without massage before TLoadDback.

  • OtherNo Additional Break

    TLoadDback begins immediately after the seated resting baseline, without an additional 15-minute preparation period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weighted Accuracy on TLoadDback (WAcc)

    Weighted accuracy across the full task: 0.65 x letter accuracy + 0.35 x digit accuracy. Letter accuracy includes correct detections and correct withholding of responses; digit accuracy is correct parity classification. Scores range from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating better performance.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

  2. Mean Heart Rate During TLoadDback

    Mean heart rate in beats per minute during the task, derived from photoplethysmography. Analyses will account for the precondition resting baseline from the same visit.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

  3. Mean Skin Conductance During TLoadDback

    Mean skin conductance in microsiemens during the task. Analyses will account for the precondition resting baseline from the same visit.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived Workload (NASA-TLX)

    Unweighted mean of six NASA-TLX ratings, each scored from 0 to 100 and oriented so that higher values indicate greater workload or poorer perceived performance.

    Time frame: Immediately after the task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

  2. Median Response Time on TLoadDback

    Median response time, in milliseconds, for correct responses that require a key press during the task.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

Other outcomes

  1. Letter Accuracy on TLoadDback

    Percentage of correct letter trials, including correct detections of repeated letters and correct withholding of responses to nonrepeated letters. Higher values indicate better performance.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

  2. Digit Accuracy on TLoadDback

    Percentage of correctly classified digit-parity trials. Scores range from 0 to 100%, with higher values indicating better performance.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

  3. Incorrect Responses on TLoadDback

    Number of incorrect responses during the task. Higher counts indicate more errors.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

  4. Omitted Required Responses on TLoadDback

    Number of trials with no response when a response is required. Correct withholding of a response to a nonrepeated letter is not counted as an omission.

    Time frame: During the 16-minute task at each of three visits approximately two weeks apart (about four weeks in total).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego im. Polskich Olimpijczyków we Wrocławiu
    Wroclaw, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No individual participant data sharing plan has been established. Study results will be reported in aggregate.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07893886
Lead sponsor
DSW Ideis University
Collaborators
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Maciej Lachowicz, PhD
Contact
maciej.lachowicz@awf.wroc.pl
+48 605 072 627
Maciej Lachowicz, PhD
principal investigator · Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego im. Polskich Olimpijczyków we Wrocławiu

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion